刑事诉讼中的职业保密:重新解释的建议

Guilherme de Toledo Góes
{"title":"刑事诉讼中的职业保密:重新解释的建议","authors":"Guilherme de Toledo Góes","doi":"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p395-433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to promote a systematic approach of the legal privilege, taking into consideration not only the professional relationships between lawyer and client, but also doctor-patient, clergy-penitent, etc. After presenting the two main problems from the recent ‘topic-approach’ to the subject, the paper analyses the structure and legal nature of the privilege in the criminal procedure rules. Then, the article offers a way to reinterpret the rationale before the privilege. In this article, the author argues that the central object of protection is the right exercised through the protected professional-trust relationships, in opposition to the argumentation in behalf of the rights of privacy and intimacy. Finally, considerations about the implementation of the exposed criteria are presented.","PeriodicalId":159774,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O sigilo profissional no processo penal: uma proposta de reinterpretação\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme de Toledo Góes\",\"doi\":\"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p395-433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to promote a systematic approach of the legal privilege, taking into consideration not only the professional relationships between lawyer and client, but also doctor-patient, clergy-penitent, etc. After presenting the two main problems from the recent ‘topic-approach’ to the subject, the paper analyses the structure and legal nature of the privilege in the criminal procedure rules. Then, the article offers a way to reinterpret the rationale before the privilege. In this article, the author argues that the central object of protection is the right exercised through the protected professional-trust relationships, in opposition to the argumentation in behalf of the rights of privacy and intimacy. Finally, considerations about the implementation of the exposed criteria are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p395-433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p395-433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在从律师与委托人的职业关系、医患关系、神职人员与忏悔者的关系等方面,推动法律特权的系统化研究。在分析了近年来“主题论”对主体的两个主要问题后,本文分析了刑事诉讼规则中特权的结构和法律性质。然后,本文提供了一种重新解释特权之前的基本原理的方法。在本文中,笔者认为,保护的核心对象是通过受保护的职业信任关系行使的权利,而不是代表隐私权和亲密权的论点。最后,介绍了关于公开标准实现的注意事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O sigilo profissional no processo penal: uma proposta de reinterpretação
This paper aims to promote a systematic approach of the legal privilege, taking into consideration not only the professional relationships between lawyer and client, but also doctor-patient, clergy-penitent, etc. After presenting the two main problems from the recent ‘topic-approach’ to the subject, the paper analyses the structure and legal nature of the privilege in the criminal procedure rules. Then, the article offers a way to reinterpret the rationale before the privilege. In this article, the author argues that the central object of protection is the right exercised through the protected professional-trust relationships, in opposition to the argumentation in behalf of the rights of privacy and intimacy. Finally, considerations about the implementation of the exposed criteria are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信