神经网络在F-16故障诊断中的研究。一、系统描述

R. McDuff, P. K. Simpson, D. Gunning
{"title":"神经网络在F-16故障诊断中的研究。一、系统描述","authors":"R. McDuff, P. K. Simpson, D. Gunning","doi":"10.1109/AUTEST.1989.81147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors report results of ongoing research exploring the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs) for F-16 flight line diagnostics. ANNs hold the promise of solving difficult logistics problems such as multiple fault diagnosis, prognostication, changing configurations and environments, and inaccurate diagnosis attributable to incomplete and/or flawed rules. The authors tested three representative ANNs to see which type worked best for the problem considered. The authors chose back propagation (BPN) and counterpropagation (CPN) because they are considered to be two of the more promising pattern matching paradigms. The binary adaptive resonance theory I (ART1) was also chosen because it learns faster than CPN or BPN and has online adaptation (i.e. does not have to be totally retrained every time a new pattern is discovered). Online adaptation is a powerful attribute, allowing new associations to be immediately incorporated into the knowledge base on the flight line or wherever needed. The authors explain the advantages and drawbacks to each network tested and describe how they were trained using historical flight line data. Of the three ANNs examined, ART1 proved to be the most appropriate and was able to produce multiple-symptom-to-multiple-fault diagnoses.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":321804,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Automatic Testing Conference.The Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Automatic Testing in the Next Decade and the 21st Century. Conference Record.","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation of neural networks for F-16 fault diagnosis. I. System description\",\"authors\":\"R. McDuff, P. K. Simpson, D. Gunning\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUTEST.1989.81147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors report results of ongoing research exploring the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs) for F-16 flight line diagnostics. ANNs hold the promise of solving difficult logistics problems such as multiple fault diagnosis, prognostication, changing configurations and environments, and inaccurate diagnosis attributable to incomplete and/or flawed rules. The authors tested three representative ANNs to see which type worked best for the problem considered. The authors chose back propagation (BPN) and counterpropagation (CPN) because they are considered to be two of the more promising pattern matching paradigms. The binary adaptive resonance theory I (ART1) was also chosen because it learns faster than CPN or BPN and has online adaptation (i.e. does not have to be totally retrained every time a new pattern is discovered). Online adaptation is a powerful attribute, allowing new associations to be immediately incorporated into the knowledge base on the flight line or wherever needed. The authors explain the advantages and drawbacks to each network tested and describe how they were trained using historical flight line data. Of the three ANNs examined, ART1 proved to be the most appropriate and was able to produce multiple-symptom-to-multiple-fault diagnoses.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Automatic Testing Conference.The Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Automatic Testing in the Next Decade and the 21st Century. Conference Record.\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Automatic Testing Conference.The Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Automatic Testing in the Next Decade and the 21st Century. Conference Record.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.1989.81147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Automatic Testing Conference.The Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Automatic Testing in the Next Decade and the 21st Century. Conference Record.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.1989.81147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

作者报告了正在进行的探索使用人工神经网络(ANNs)进行F-16飞行线路诊断的研究结果。人工神经网络有望解决复杂的物流问题,如多故障诊断、预测、改变配置和环境,以及由于不完整和/或有缺陷的规则而导致的不准确诊断。作者测试了三种具有代表性的人工神经网络,看看哪种类型最适合所考虑的问题。作者选择反向传播(BPN)和反向传播(CPN)是因为它们被认为是两种更有前途的模式匹配范式。二进制自适应共振理论I (ART1)也被选择,因为它比CPN或BPN学习更快,并且具有在线适应性(即每次发现新模式时不必完全重新训练)。在线适应是一个强大的属性,允许将新的关联立即合并到航线或任何需要的知识库中。作者解释了每个网络测试的优点和缺点,并描述了如何使用历史航线数据进行训练。在检查的三个人工神经网络中,ART1被证明是最合适的,并且能够产生多症状对多故障的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An investigation of neural networks for F-16 fault diagnosis. I. System description
The authors report results of ongoing research exploring the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs) for F-16 flight line diagnostics. ANNs hold the promise of solving difficult logistics problems such as multiple fault diagnosis, prognostication, changing configurations and environments, and inaccurate diagnosis attributable to incomplete and/or flawed rules. The authors tested three representative ANNs to see which type worked best for the problem considered. The authors chose back propagation (BPN) and counterpropagation (CPN) because they are considered to be two of the more promising pattern matching paradigms. The binary adaptive resonance theory I (ART1) was also chosen because it learns faster than CPN or BPN and has online adaptation (i.e. does not have to be totally retrained every time a new pattern is discovered). Online adaptation is a powerful attribute, allowing new associations to be immediately incorporated into the knowledge base on the flight line or wherever needed. The authors explain the advantages and drawbacks to each network tested and describe how they were trained using historical flight line data. Of the three ANNs examined, ART1 proved to be the most appropriate and was able to produce multiple-symptom-to-multiple-fault diagnoses.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信