{"title":"参数路径延迟故障的可诊断性度量","authors":"M. Sivaraman, A. Strojwas","doi":"10.1109/VTEST.1996.510874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Published research on delay fault testing has largely focused on generating a minimal set of test vector pairs to detect as many delay faults in a circuit as possible. Little regard has been paid to the diagnosability of delay faults in the quest for generating tests which can simultaneously detect a delay fault on many paths, one loses the ability to determine which paths caused a chip failure. In an earlier work [1996] we presented a framework to detect which paths are likely to have caused a chip failure for a set of delay fault tests, and to find the associated likely fabrication process parameter variations. Here, we quantify the diagnosability of a path delay fault for a test, and develop a methodology based on the diagnosis framework presented earlier to determine the diagnosability of each path delay fault detected by a given test set. Furthermore, we apply this approach to find the diagnosability of robust path delay faults for the ISCAS'89 benchmark circuits.","PeriodicalId":424579,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 14th VLSI Test Symposium","volume":"232 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A diagnosability metric for parametric path delay faults\",\"authors\":\"M. Sivaraman, A. Strojwas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VTEST.1996.510874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Published research on delay fault testing has largely focused on generating a minimal set of test vector pairs to detect as many delay faults in a circuit as possible. Little regard has been paid to the diagnosability of delay faults in the quest for generating tests which can simultaneously detect a delay fault on many paths, one loses the ability to determine which paths caused a chip failure. In an earlier work [1996] we presented a framework to detect which paths are likely to have caused a chip failure for a set of delay fault tests, and to find the associated likely fabrication process parameter variations. Here, we quantify the diagnosability of a path delay fault for a test, and develop a methodology based on the diagnosis framework presented earlier to determine the diagnosability of each path delay fault detected by a given test set. Furthermore, we apply this approach to find the diagnosability of robust path delay faults for the ISCAS'89 benchmark circuits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 14th VLSI Test Symposium\",\"volume\":\"232 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 14th VLSI Test Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VTEST.1996.510874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 14th VLSI Test Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VTEST.1996.510874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A diagnosability metric for parametric path delay faults
Published research on delay fault testing has largely focused on generating a minimal set of test vector pairs to detect as many delay faults in a circuit as possible. Little regard has been paid to the diagnosability of delay faults in the quest for generating tests which can simultaneously detect a delay fault on many paths, one loses the ability to determine which paths caused a chip failure. In an earlier work [1996] we presented a framework to detect which paths are likely to have caused a chip failure for a set of delay fault tests, and to find the associated likely fabrication process parameter variations. Here, we quantify the diagnosability of a path delay fault for a test, and develop a methodology based on the diagnosis framework presented earlier to determine the diagnosability of each path delay fault detected by a given test set. Furthermore, we apply this approach to find the diagnosability of robust path delay faults for the ISCAS'89 benchmark circuits.