晶圆制造系统MIM失效分析方法

A. Teo, A. G. Boon, N. H. Peng, Chen Chang Qing, Xu Nai Yun, N. Dayanand, Tam Yong Seng, Mai Zhi Hong, J. Lam
{"title":"晶圆制造系统MIM失效分析方法","authors":"A. Teo, A. G. Boon, N. H. Peng, Chen Chang Qing, Xu Nai Yun, N. Dayanand, Tam Yong Seng, Mai Zhi Hong, J. Lam","doi":"10.1109/IPFA.2018.8452519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a low yield case relating to IDD leakage at active mode due to the systematic breakdown signature consistently at the top MIM edge was studied. The systematic problem solving process based on the application of a variety of FA techniques such as TIVA, AFP probing, layout path tracing, FIB circuit edit, SEM XTEM and top down PFA methodology together with Fab investigation are used to understand the root cause as well as failure mechanism. This paper highlights that there are 2 types of leakage (high leakage in mA and low leakage in uA). The high leakage dies revealed spot directly at the MIM cap and anomaly can be observed at the MIM edge. However, for the low level leakage, hotspot was seen at the PMOS transistor and NOT at the MIM Cap. Besides layout tracing that enable to pinpoint the suspected MIM cap, 2 types of simulation (Intentionally induced damage and FIB Circuit Edit) were performed to prove and validate the MIM defect is the only root cause for this low yield issue and the RF circuitry has no contribution to it. Additionally, top down PFA methodology was engaged to reveal the physical evidence of the damage at the edge of the MIM. This confirmed that both type of leakage are due to similar MIM breakdown issue.","PeriodicalId":382811,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure Analysis Methodology on Systematic MIM failure in Wafer Fabrication\",\"authors\":\"A. Teo, A. G. Boon, N. H. Peng, Chen Chang Qing, Xu Nai Yun, N. Dayanand, Tam Yong Seng, Mai Zhi Hong, J. Lam\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPFA.2018.8452519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a low yield case relating to IDD leakage at active mode due to the systematic breakdown signature consistently at the top MIM edge was studied. The systematic problem solving process based on the application of a variety of FA techniques such as TIVA, AFP probing, layout path tracing, FIB circuit edit, SEM XTEM and top down PFA methodology together with Fab investigation are used to understand the root cause as well as failure mechanism. This paper highlights that there are 2 types of leakage (high leakage in mA and low leakage in uA). The high leakage dies revealed spot directly at the MIM cap and anomaly can be observed at the MIM edge. However, for the low level leakage, hotspot was seen at the PMOS transistor and NOT at the MIM Cap. Besides layout tracing that enable to pinpoint the suspected MIM cap, 2 types of simulation (Intentionally induced damage and FIB Circuit Edit) were performed to prove and validate the MIM defect is the only root cause for this low yield issue and the RF circuitry has no contribution to it. Additionally, top down PFA methodology was engaged to reveal the physical evidence of the damage at the edge of the MIM. This confirmed that both type of leakage are due to similar MIM breakdown issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPFA.2018.8452519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPFA.2018.8452519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文研究了在有源模式下由于系统击穿特征一致而导致的IDD泄漏的低产量情况。系统的问题解决过程基于各种FA技术的应用,如TIVA、AFP探测、布局路径跟踪、FIB电路编辑、SEM XTEM和自上而下的PFA方法,以及Fab调查,以了解故障的根本原因和失效机制。本文重点介绍了两种漏电类型(毫安高漏电和uA低漏电)。高漏模直接显示在MIM帽处,在MIM边缘处可以观察到异常。然而,对于低水平泄漏,热点出现在PMOS晶体管上,而不是在MIM帽上。除了能够精确定位可疑MIM帽的布局跟踪外,还进行了2种类型的模拟(故意诱导损伤和FIB电路编辑),以证明和验证MIM缺陷是造成这种低产量问题的唯一根本原因,RF电路对此没有贡献。此外,采用自顶向下的PFA方法来揭示MIM边缘损坏的物理证据。这证实了两种类型的泄漏都是由于类似的MIM击穿问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Failure Analysis Methodology on Systematic MIM failure in Wafer Fabrication
In this paper, a low yield case relating to IDD leakage at active mode due to the systematic breakdown signature consistently at the top MIM edge was studied. The systematic problem solving process based on the application of a variety of FA techniques such as TIVA, AFP probing, layout path tracing, FIB circuit edit, SEM XTEM and top down PFA methodology together with Fab investigation are used to understand the root cause as well as failure mechanism. This paper highlights that there are 2 types of leakage (high leakage in mA and low leakage in uA). The high leakage dies revealed spot directly at the MIM cap and anomaly can be observed at the MIM edge. However, for the low level leakage, hotspot was seen at the PMOS transistor and NOT at the MIM Cap. Besides layout tracing that enable to pinpoint the suspected MIM cap, 2 types of simulation (Intentionally induced damage and FIB Circuit Edit) were performed to prove and validate the MIM defect is the only root cause for this low yield issue and the RF circuitry has no contribution to it. Additionally, top down PFA methodology was engaged to reveal the physical evidence of the damage at the edge of the MIM. This confirmed that both type of leakage are due to similar MIM breakdown issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信