基于机器学习的增量功能诊断技术:比较分析

C. Bolchini, Luca Cassano
{"title":"基于机器学习的增量功能诊断技术:比较分析","authors":"C. Bolchini, Luca Cassano","doi":"10.1109/DFT.2014.6962064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incremental functional diagnosis is the process of iteratively selecting a test, executing it and based on the collected outcome deciding either to execute one more test or to stop the process since a faulty candidate component can be identified. The aim is to minimise the cost and the duration of the diagnosis process. In this paper we compare six engines based on machine learning techniques for driving the diagnosis. The comparison has been carried out under a twofold point of view: on the one hand, we analysed the issues related to the use of the considered techniques for the design of incremental diagnosis engines; on the other hand, we carried out a set of experiments on three synthetic but realistic scenarios to assess accuracy and efficiency.","PeriodicalId":414665,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFT)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-based techniques for incremental functional diagnosis: A comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"C. Bolchini, Luca Cassano\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DFT.2014.6962064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Incremental functional diagnosis is the process of iteratively selecting a test, executing it and based on the collected outcome deciding either to execute one more test or to stop the process since a faulty candidate component can be identified. The aim is to minimise the cost and the duration of the diagnosis process. In this paper we compare six engines based on machine learning techniques for driving the diagnosis. The comparison has been carried out under a twofold point of view: on the one hand, we analysed the issues related to the use of the considered techniques for the design of incremental diagnosis engines; on the other hand, we carried out a set of experiments on three synthetic but realistic scenarios to assess accuracy and efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFT)\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DFT.2014.6962064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DFT.2014.6962064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

增量功能诊断是这样一个过程:迭代地选择一个测试,执行它,并根据收集到的结果决定是再执行一个测试,还是因为可以识别出有缺陷的候选组件而停止该过程。目的是尽量减少成本和诊断过程的持续时间。在本文中,我们比较了六种基于机器学习技术驱动诊断的引擎。比较是在双重观点下进行的:一方面,我们分析了与使用所考虑的技术设计增量诊断引擎相关的问题;另一方面,我们在三个合成但现实的场景下进行了一组实验,以评估准确性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning-based techniques for incremental functional diagnosis: A comparative analysis
Incremental functional diagnosis is the process of iteratively selecting a test, executing it and based on the collected outcome deciding either to execute one more test or to stop the process since a faulty candidate component can be identified. The aim is to minimise the cost and the duration of the diagnosis process. In this paper we compare six engines based on machine learning techniques for driving the diagnosis. The comparison has been carried out under a twofold point of view: on the one hand, we analysed the issues related to the use of the considered techniques for the design of incremental diagnosis engines; on the other hand, we carried out a set of experiments on three synthetic but realistic scenarios to assess accuracy and efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信