通用航空电子应用中数据累加器MCM-L模块的密封等效封装

C. Conway, J. Hagge
{"title":"通用航空电子应用中数据累加器MCM-L模块的密封等效封装","authors":"C. Conway, J. Hagge","doi":"10.1109/ICMCM.1998.670817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of comparative testing of standard encapsulants versus inorganic hermetic-equivalent protective coatings in a full factorial study that also compares wire-bond assembly versus flip-chip assembly and supplemental encapsulant/underfill die protections versus no encapsulant/underfill protection. The demonstration multichip modules (MCMs) included two design versions, flip-chip and wire-bond, of a general aviation data accumulator MCM. Full wafer probe testing was performed both before and after the supplemental ChipSeal/sup TM/ processing and flip-chip wafer bump processing steps. ChipSeal/sup TM/ and flip-chip wafer processing steps were shown to cause no yield degradation of the the two different wafer types used in the MCMs. Known good die (KGD) screening of all ICs in the modules was used to keep infant mortality failures out of the reliability test results. Preliminary substrate reliability investigations determined that BT and polyimide laminate materials are suitable for robust MCM-L applications. Reliability testing includes vibration in step-stress exposures from 2 to 44 g(RMS), thermal cycling for 2000 cycles from -55 to +125/spl deg/C, 85/spl deg/C/85% RH high humidity testing accelerated by pre-conditioning and power cycling, and 130/spl deg/C bias highly accelerated stress testing (HAST). Comparative reliability results are presented for identical circuit designs in flip-chip versus wire-bonded assemblies, with and without the protective inorganic coatings, and with and without organic encapsulant/underfill protection.","PeriodicalId":315799,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 1998 International Conference on Multichip Modules and High Density Packaging (Cat. No.98EX154)","volume":"14 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hermetic-equivalent packaging of data accumulator MCM-L modules for general aviation avionics applications\",\"authors\":\"C. Conway, J. Hagge\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMCM.1998.670817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the results of comparative testing of standard encapsulants versus inorganic hermetic-equivalent protective coatings in a full factorial study that also compares wire-bond assembly versus flip-chip assembly and supplemental encapsulant/underfill die protections versus no encapsulant/underfill protection. The demonstration multichip modules (MCMs) included two design versions, flip-chip and wire-bond, of a general aviation data accumulator MCM. Full wafer probe testing was performed both before and after the supplemental ChipSeal/sup TM/ processing and flip-chip wafer bump processing steps. ChipSeal/sup TM/ and flip-chip wafer processing steps were shown to cause no yield degradation of the the two different wafer types used in the MCMs. Known good die (KGD) screening of all ICs in the modules was used to keep infant mortality failures out of the reliability test results. Preliminary substrate reliability investigations determined that BT and polyimide laminate materials are suitable for robust MCM-L applications. Reliability testing includes vibration in step-stress exposures from 2 to 44 g(RMS), thermal cycling for 2000 cycles from -55 to +125/spl deg/C, 85/spl deg/C/85% RH high humidity testing accelerated by pre-conditioning and power cycling, and 130/spl deg/C bias highly accelerated stress testing (HAST). Comparative reliability results are presented for identical circuit designs in flip-chip versus wire-bonded assemblies, with and without the protective inorganic coatings, and with and without organic encapsulant/underfill protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 1998 International Conference on Multichip Modules and High Density Packaging (Cat. No.98EX154)\",\"volume\":\"14 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 1998 International Conference on Multichip Modules and High Density Packaging (Cat. No.98EX154)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMCM.1998.670817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 1998 International Conference on Multichip Modules and High Density Packaging (Cat. No.98EX154)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMCM.1998.670817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文介绍了一项全因子研究中标准封装剂与无机密封等效保护涂层的比较测试结果,该研究还比较了线键组装与倒装芯片组装以及补充封装剂/下填充剂模具保护与无封装剂/下填充剂保护。演示多芯片模块(MCM)包括通用航空数据累加器MCM的倒装和线键两种设计版本。在补充ChipSeal/sup TM/加工和倒装晶圆碰撞处理步骤之前和之后都进行了全晶圆探头测试。ChipSeal/sup /和倒装晶圆处理步骤显示不会导致mcm中使用的两种不同晶圆类型的良率下降。对模块中所有集成电路进行已知好模(KGD)筛选,以使婴儿死亡率失败不影响可靠性测试结果。初步的衬底可靠性调查确定了BT和聚酰亚胺层压材料适用于坚固的MCM-L应用。可靠性测试包括从2到44 g(RMS)的阶梯应力暴露中的振动,从-55到+125/spl°C的2000个循环的热循环,85/spl°C/85% RH高湿度测试,通过预处理和功率循环加速,以及130/spl°C偏压高加速应力测试(HAST)。本文给出了倒装芯片与线键式组件中相同电路设计的可靠性比较结果,包括有和没有保护性无机涂层,以及有和没有有机密封剂/下填料保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hermetic-equivalent packaging of data accumulator MCM-L modules for general aviation avionics applications
This paper presents the results of comparative testing of standard encapsulants versus inorganic hermetic-equivalent protective coatings in a full factorial study that also compares wire-bond assembly versus flip-chip assembly and supplemental encapsulant/underfill die protections versus no encapsulant/underfill protection. The demonstration multichip modules (MCMs) included two design versions, flip-chip and wire-bond, of a general aviation data accumulator MCM. Full wafer probe testing was performed both before and after the supplemental ChipSeal/sup TM/ processing and flip-chip wafer bump processing steps. ChipSeal/sup TM/ and flip-chip wafer processing steps were shown to cause no yield degradation of the the two different wafer types used in the MCMs. Known good die (KGD) screening of all ICs in the modules was used to keep infant mortality failures out of the reliability test results. Preliminary substrate reliability investigations determined that BT and polyimide laminate materials are suitable for robust MCM-L applications. Reliability testing includes vibration in step-stress exposures from 2 to 44 g(RMS), thermal cycling for 2000 cycles from -55 to +125/spl deg/C, 85/spl deg/C/85% RH high humidity testing accelerated by pre-conditioning and power cycling, and 130/spl deg/C bias highly accelerated stress testing (HAST). Comparative reliability results are presented for identical circuit designs in flip-chip versus wire-bonded assemblies, with and without the protective inorganic coatings, and with and without organic encapsulant/underfill protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信