功率MOS晶体管温度评估的电学技术比较

A. Ferrara, P. Steeneken, K. Reimann, A. Heringa, L. Yan, B. Boksteen, M. Swanenberg, G. Koops, A. Scholten, R. Surdeanu, J. Schmitz, R. Hueting
{"title":"功率MOS晶体管温度评估的电学技术比较","authors":"A. Ferrara, P. Steeneken, K. Reimann, A. Heringa, L. Yan, B. Boksteen, M. Swanenberg, G. Koops, A. Scholten, R. Surdeanu, J. Schmitz, R. Hueting","doi":"10.1109/ICMTS.2013.6528156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three electrical techniques (pulsed-gate, AC-conductance and sense-diode) for temperature evaluation in power MOS transistors have been experimentally compared on the same device. The device under test is a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) laterally-diffused MOSFET (LDMOS) design with embedded sense-diodes in the center and at the edge of the device for providing local temperature information. On-wafer measurements have been performed on a thermal chuck in the temperature range 25-200°C to extract self-heating information and predict the junction temperature for different biasing conditions. Good agreement (within 10%) between the different techniques is achieved, evidencing that reliable temperature estimations can be made using each of the proposed electrical techniques. As a result, factors other than experimental accuracy will play a role in the choice of the most adequate technique for the application of interest. Guidelines for this choice are provided in a benchmarking analysis accounting for ease of application, temperature calibration and accuracy of the results.","PeriodicalId":142589,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structures (ICMTS)","volume":"2018 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of electrical techniques for temperature evaluation in power MOS transistors\",\"authors\":\"A. Ferrara, P. Steeneken, K. Reimann, A. Heringa, L. Yan, B. Boksteen, M. Swanenberg, G. Koops, A. Scholten, R. Surdeanu, J. Schmitz, R. Hueting\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMTS.2013.6528156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three electrical techniques (pulsed-gate, AC-conductance and sense-diode) for temperature evaluation in power MOS transistors have been experimentally compared on the same device. The device under test is a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) laterally-diffused MOSFET (LDMOS) design with embedded sense-diodes in the center and at the edge of the device for providing local temperature information. On-wafer measurements have been performed on a thermal chuck in the temperature range 25-200°C to extract self-heating information and predict the junction temperature for different biasing conditions. Good agreement (within 10%) between the different techniques is achieved, evidencing that reliable temperature estimations can be made using each of the proposed electrical techniques. As a result, factors other than experimental accuracy will play a role in the choice of the most adequate technique for the application of interest. Guidelines for this choice are provided in a benchmarking analysis accounting for ease of application, temperature calibration and accuracy of the results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structures (ICMTS)\",\"volume\":\"2018 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structures (ICMTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMTS.2013.6528156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structures (ICMTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMTS.2013.6528156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在同一器件上实验比较了三种用于功率MOS晶体管温度评估的电学技术(脉冲栅极、交流电导和感测二极管)。测试中的器件是绝缘体上硅(SOI)横向扩散MOSFET (LDMOS)设计,在器件的中心和边缘嵌入感测二极管,用于提供局部温度信息。在温度范围为25-200°C的热卡盘上进行了晶圆测量,以提取自热信息并预测不同偏置条件下的结温。不同技术之间取得了良好的一致性(在10%以内),证明可以使用每种提出的电气技术进行可靠的温度估计。因此,除实验精度以外的其他因素将在选择最适合应用的技术方面发挥作用。这种选择的指导方针在基准分析中提供,考虑到易于应用,温度校准和结果的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of electrical techniques for temperature evaluation in power MOS transistors
Three electrical techniques (pulsed-gate, AC-conductance and sense-diode) for temperature evaluation in power MOS transistors have been experimentally compared on the same device. The device under test is a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) laterally-diffused MOSFET (LDMOS) design with embedded sense-diodes in the center and at the edge of the device for providing local temperature information. On-wafer measurements have been performed on a thermal chuck in the temperature range 25-200°C to extract self-heating information and predict the junction temperature for different biasing conditions. Good agreement (within 10%) between the different techniques is achieved, evidencing that reliable temperature estimations can be made using each of the proposed electrical techniques. As a result, factors other than experimental accuracy will play a role in the choice of the most adequate technique for the application of interest. Guidelines for this choice are provided in a benchmarking analysis accounting for ease of application, temperature calibration and accuracy of the results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信