在14nm及以上节点的OPC模型中实现精确的掩模模型

Nacer Zine El Abidine, F. Sundermann, E. Yesilada, V. Farys, Frederic Huguennet, A. Armeanu, I. Bork, M. Chomat, P. Buck, I. Schanen
{"title":"在14nm及以上节点的OPC模型中实现精确的掩模模型","authors":"Nacer Zine El Abidine, F. Sundermann, E. Yesilada, V. Farys, Frederic Huguennet, A. Armeanu, I. Bork, M. Chomat, P. Buck, I. Schanen","doi":"10.1117/12.2203267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a previous work [1] we demonstrated that current OPC model assuming the mask pattern to be analogous to the designed data is no longer valid. Indeed as depicted in figure 1, an extreme case of line-end shortening shows a gap up to 10 nm difference (at mask level). For that reason an accurate mask model, for a 14nm logic gate level has been calibrated. A model with a total RMS of 1.38nm at mask level was obtained. 2D structures such as line-end shortening and corner rounding were well predicted using SEM pictures overlaid with simulated contours. The first part of this paper is dedicated to the implementation of our improved model in current flow. The improved model consists of a mask model capturing mask process and writing effects and a standard optical and resist model addressing the litho exposure and development effects at wafer level. The second part will focus on results from the comparison of the two models, the new and the regular, as depicted in figure 2.","PeriodicalId":308777,"journal":{"name":"SPIE Photomask Technology","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accurate mask model implementation in OPC model for 14nm nodes and beyond\",\"authors\":\"Nacer Zine El Abidine, F. Sundermann, E. Yesilada, V. Farys, Frederic Huguennet, A. Armeanu, I. Bork, M. Chomat, P. Buck, I. Schanen\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2203267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a previous work [1] we demonstrated that current OPC model assuming the mask pattern to be analogous to the designed data is no longer valid. Indeed as depicted in figure 1, an extreme case of line-end shortening shows a gap up to 10 nm difference (at mask level). For that reason an accurate mask model, for a 14nm logic gate level has been calibrated. A model with a total RMS of 1.38nm at mask level was obtained. 2D structures such as line-end shortening and corner rounding were well predicted using SEM pictures overlaid with simulated contours. The first part of this paper is dedicated to the implementation of our improved model in current flow. The improved model consists of a mask model capturing mask process and writing effects and a standard optical and resist model addressing the litho exposure and development effects at wafer level. The second part will focus on results from the comparison of the two models, the new and the regular, as depicted in figure 2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPIE Photomask Technology\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPIE Photomask Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2203267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPIE Photomask Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2203267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在之前的工作[1]中,我们证明了假设掩模模式与设计数据相似的当前OPC模型不再有效。事实上,如图1所示,线端缩短的极端情况显示出高达10 nm的差距(在掩模级别)。由于这个原因,一个精确的掩模模型,为14纳米逻辑门电平已经校准。得到掩模水平的总RMS为1.38nm的模型。利用覆盖模拟轮廓的扫描电镜图像,可以很好地预测线端缩短和圆角等二维结构。本文的第一部分是我们改进的模型在当前流中的实现。改进的模型包括捕捉掩模过程和写入效果的掩模模型,以及解决晶圆级光刻曝光和显影效果的标准光学和抗蚀剂模型。第二部分将重点介绍两种模型(新模型和常规模型)的比较结果,如图2所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accurate mask model implementation in OPC model for 14nm nodes and beyond
In a previous work [1] we demonstrated that current OPC model assuming the mask pattern to be analogous to the designed data is no longer valid. Indeed as depicted in figure 1, an extreme case of line-end shortening shows a gap up to 10 nm difference (at mask level). For that reason an accurate mask model, for a 14nm logic gate level has been calibrated. A model with a total RMS of 1.38nm at mask level was obtained. 2D structures such as line-end shortening and corner rounding were well predicted using SEM pictures overlaid with simulated contours. The first part of this paper is dedicated to the implementation of our improved model in current flow. The improved model consists of a mask model capturing mask process and writing effects and a standard optical and resist model addressing the litho exposure and development effects at wafer level. The second part will focus on results from the comparison of the two models, the new and the regular, as depicted in figure 2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信