模块化有形用户界面:模块形状和连接强度对交互的影响

Laura Pruszko, Hongri Gu, J. Bourgeois, Yann Laurillau, C. Coutrix
{"title":"模块化有形用户界面:模块形状和连接强度对交互的影响","authors":"Laura Pruszko, Hongri Gu, J. Bourgeois, Yann Laurillau, C. Coutrix","doi":"10.1145/3569009.3572731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modular Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs) –i.e., UIs made of small-scale physical modules– offer novel opportunities for tangible interaction thanks to their highly customizable form factor. Such modular TUIs were proposed with different shape of modules and bonding strength between them. The problem we address in this paper is the lack of knowledge of how bonding strength and shape of the modules impact usability. We present the first study exploring the impact of bonding strength and module shape on subjective user ratings when interacting with a magnetic modular prototype. We assessed three levels of bonding strength (low, mid, high) and two shapes (cubes and rounded cubes) in a controlled user study. Participants performed eight common manipulations found in the literature for (non-)modular TUIs. Experimental results showed that (1) cubic modules are overall easier and more satisfying to manipulate, except for precision and bending tasks, (2) low strength impairs UI solidity, but high strength impairs precision tasks with cubic modules.","PeriodicalId":183744,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modular Tangible User Interfaces: Impact of Module Shape and Bonding Strength on Interaction\",\"authors\":\"Laura Pruszko, Hongri Gu, J. Bourgeois, Yann Laurillau, C. Coutrix\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3569009.3572731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modular Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs) –i.e., UIs made of small-scale physical modules– offer novel opportunities for tangible interaction thanks to their highly customizable form factor. Such modular TUIs were proposed with different shape of modules and bonding strength between them. The problem we address in this paper is the lack of knowledge of how bonding strength and shape of the modules impact usability. We present the first study exploring the impact of bonding strength and module shape on subjective user ratings when interacting with a magnetic modular prototype. We assessed three levels of bonding strength (low, mid, high) and two shapes (cubes and rounded cubes) in a controlled user study. Participants performed eight common manipulations found in the literature for (non-)modular TUIs. Experimental results showed that (1) cubic modules are overall easier and more satisfying to manipulate, except for precision and bending tasks, (2) low strength impairs UI solidity, but high strength impairs precision tasks with cubic modules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3569009.3572731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3569009.3572731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

模块化有形用户界面(TUIs) -即例如,由小型物理模块组成的ui,由于其高度可定制的外形因素,为实际交互提供了新的机会。提出了具有不同模块形状和模块间结合强度的模块化ui。我们在本文中解决的问题是缺乏关于模块的结合强度和形状如何影响可用性的知识。我们提出了第一项研究,探索在与磁性模块原型交互时,结合强度和模块形状对主观用户评级的影响。在一项受控用户研究中,我们评估了三个层次的粘接强度(低、中、高)和两种形状(立方体和圆角立方体)。参与者执行了文献中(非)模块化ui的八种常见操作。实验结果表明:(1)除了精密和弯曲任务外,立方体模块总体上更容易操作,更令人满意;(2)低强度会损害UI的坚固性,而高强度会损害立方体模块的精密任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modular Tangible User Interfaces: Impact of Module Shape and Bonding Strength on Interaction
Modular Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs) –i.e., UIs made of small-scale physical modules– offer novel opportunities for tangible interaction thanks to their highly customizable form factor. Such modular TUIs were proposed with different shape of modules and bonding strength between them. The problem we address in this paper is the lack of knowledge of how bonding strength and shape of the modules impact usability. We present the first study exploring the impact of bonding strength and module shape on subjective user ratings when interacting with a magnetic modular prototype. We assessed three levels of bonding strength (low, mid, high) and two shapes (cubes and rounded cubes) in a controlled user study. Participants performed eight common manipulations found in the literature for (non-)modular TUIs. Experimental results showed that (1) cubic modules are overall easier and more satisfying to manipulate, except for precision and bending tasks, (2) low strength impairs UI solidity, but high strength impairs precision tasks with cubic modules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信