晶圆级可靠性利用率和趋势

E. Achee
{"title":"晶圆级可靠性利用率和趋势","authors":"E. Achee","doi":"10.1109/IRWS.1994.515842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This discussion group sought to bring greater understanding of the types and amount of wafer level reliability testing that are used throughout the semiconductor industry. With a greater understanding of what each company is actually practicing in their individual WLR efforts and how these programs have benefited reliability improvements in products, we can change or expand our existing programs uo provide added value. VVe are also looking to highlight the difference between WLR testing that is used as a ongoing monitor and testing that is a true reliability indicator for product. The ultimate goal is to be able to make fact and data based decisions from wafer level testing to prevent us from having to rely on lengthy package level testing results. 'The discussion group was structured to fist identify some of the reasons that we are currently forced to disposition deviate product without the appropriate data. When engineering level data is not available, the decision making process can default to non data based decision making due to issues like economics, time, conjecture, or misuse of data. The second step was to identify the WLR activities and capabilities of the companies represented and the failure mechanism each test monitors or targets. This is a good industry poll of the actual activities in use or final development today and served to show the level of WLR implementation throughout the industry. Slide 2 shows these results. The next step is to identify the actual reliability issues we see today within our industry or companies. These are supposed to be actual failure mechanisms seen today and not mechanisms that monitors are in place to detect. With a comprehensive list of these failure mechanisms, we can identify the existing WLR testing available for the mechanism or identify mechanisms for which we have no current method of testing with current WLR methodologies. Slides 3 & 4 shows the resulting list of failure mechanisms and the WLR tests identified to address these mechanisms. The discussion showed that the companies using particular WLR tests were not necess","PeriodicalId":164872,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop (IRWS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wafer Level Reliability Utilization and Trends\",\"authors\":\"E. Achee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IRWS.1994.515842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This discussion group sought to bring greater understanding of the types and amount of wafer level reliability testing that are used throughout the semiconductor industry. With a greater understanding of what each company is actually practicing in their individual WLR efforts and how these programs have benefited reliability improvements in products, we can change or expand our existing programs uo provide added value. VVe are also looking to highlight the difference between WLR testing that is used as a ongoing monitor and testing that is a true reliability indicator for product. The ultimate goal is to be able to make fact and data based decisions from wafer level testing to prevent us from having to rely on lengthy package level testing results. 'The discussion group was structured to fist identify some of the reasons that we are currently forced to disposition deviate product without the appropriate data. When engineering level data is not available, the decision making process can default to non data based decision making due to issues like economics, time, conjecture, or misuse of data. The second step was to identify the WLR activities and capabilities of the companies represented and the failure mechanism each test monitors or targets. This is a good industry poll of the actual activities in use or final development today and served to show the level of WLR implementation throughout the industry. Slide 2 shows these results. The next step is to identify the actual reliability issues we see today within our industry or companies. These are supposed to be actual failure mechanisms seen today and not mechanisms that monitors are in place to detect. With a comprehensive list of these failure mechanisms, we can identify the existing WLR testing available for the mechanism or identify mechanisms for which we have no current method of testing with current WLR methodologies. Slides 3 & 4 shows the resulting list of failure mechanisms and the WLR tests identified to address these mechanisms. The discussion showed that the companies using particular WLR tests were not necess\",\"PeriodicalId\":164872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop (IRWS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop (IRWS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRWS.1994.515842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop (IRWS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRWS.1994.515842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本次讨论小组旨在加深对整个半导体行业中使用的晶圆级可靠性测试的类型和数量的理解。随着对每家公司在各自的WLR工作中实际实践的深入了解,以及这些项目如何提高产品的可靠性,我们可以改变或扩展我们现有的项目,以提供附加价值。VVe还希望强调作为持续监控的WLR测试与作为产品真正可靠性指标的测试之间的区别。最终目标是能够从晶圆级测试中做出基于事实和数据的决策,以防止我们不得不依赖冗长的封装级测试结果。“讨论小组的结构是首先确定我们目前被迫在没有适当数据的情况下处理偏离产品的一些原因。”当无法获得工程级别的数据时,由于经济、时间、推测或数据滥用等问题,决策过程可能默认为非基于数据的决策。第二步是确定所代表的公司的WLR活动和能力,以及每个测试监视或目标的故障机制。这是对目前正在使用或最终开发的实际活动的一次很好的行业调查,显示了整个行业的WLR实施水平。幻灯片2显示了这些结果。下一步是确定我们目前在行业或公司中看到的实际可靠性问题。这些应该是今天看到的实际故障机制,而不是监控器用来检测的机制。有了这些失效机制的综合列表,我们可以确定现有的可用的机制WLR测试,或者确定我们没有当前WLR方法测试方法的机制。幻灯片3和4显示了故障机制的结果列表,以及为解决这些机制而确定的WLR测试。讨论表明,公司没有必要使用特定的WLR测试
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wafer Level Reliability Utilization and Trends
This discussion group sought to bring greater understanding of the types and amount of wafer level reliability testing that are used throughout the semiconductor industry. With a greater understanding of what each company is actually practicing in their individual WLR efforts and how these programs have benefited reliability improvements in products, we can change or expand our existing programs uo provide added value. VVe are also looking to highlight the difference between WLR testing that is used as a ongoing monitor and testing that is a true reliability indicator for product. The ultimate goal is to be able to make fact and data based decisions from wafer level testing to prevent us from having to rely on lengthy package level testing results. 'The discussion group was structured to fist identify some of the reasons that we are currently forced to disposition deviate product without the appropriate data. When engineering level data is not available, the decision making process can default to non data based decision making due to issues like economics, time, conjecture, or misuse of data. The second step was to identify the WLR activities and capabilities of the companies represented and the failure mechanism each test monitors or targets. This is a good industry poll of the actual activities in use or final development today and served to show the level of WLR implementation throughout the industry. Slide 2 shows these results. The next step is to identify the actual reliability issues we see today within our industry or companies. These are supposed to be actual failure mechanisms seen today and not mechanisms that monitors are in place to detect. With a comprehensive list of these failure mechanisms, we can identify the existing WLR testing available for the mechanism or identify mechanisms for which we have no current method of testing with current WLR methodologies. Slides 3 & 4 shows the resulting list of failure mechanisms and the WLR tests identified to address these mechanisms. The discussion showed that the companies using particular WLR tests were not necess
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信