A. Pesetski, J. Baumgardner, J. Murduck, Eric N. Folk, J. Przybysz, J. Adam, Hong Zhang, J. Verspecht, D. Barataud, J. Teyssier, J. Nebus, Choongeol Cho, P. Hale, D. I. Bergman, D. Keenan, Nazia Akil, B. Grossman, H. Arslan, Daljeet Singh, J. Randa, S. Sweeney, T. Mckay, D. Walker, D. Greenberg, J. Tao, Judah Mendez, G. A. Rezvani, J. Pekarik
{"title":"栅极长度为0.12 μm的CMOS器件噪声参数测量的实验室间比较","authors":"A. Pesetski, J. Baumgardner, J. Murduck, Eric N. Folk, J. Przybysz, J. Adam, Hong Zhang, J. Verspecht, D. Barataud, J. Teyssier, J. Nebus, Choongeol Cho, P. Hale, D. I. Bergman, D. Keenan, Nazia Akil, B. Grossman, H. Arslan, Daljeet Singh, J. Randa, S. Sweeney, T. Mckay, D. Walker, D. Greenberg, J. Tao, Judah Mendez, G. A. Rezvani, J. Pekarik","doi":"10.1109/ARFTG.2005.8373127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present results of an interlaboratory comparison of S-parameter and noise-parameter measurements performed on 0.12 µm gate-length CMOS transistors. Copies of the same device were measured at three different laboratories (IBM, NIST, RFMD), and the results were compared. Each of the laboratories used a different measurement method, although two used similar commercial systems. Effects of different calibration reference planes are shown. The devices measured have large values of |S11|, |S22|, and |Γopt|, and have very low minimum noise figures (below 0.2 dB) over some of the frequency range. For the most part, the measurements at the different laboratories are in reasonable agreement, though there are discrepancies. It is also evident that the noise performance of the devices is better than our ability to measure it.","PeriodicalId":444012,"journal":{"name":"2005 66th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interlaboratory comparison of noise-parameter measurements on CMOS devices with 0.12 μm gate length\",\"authors\":\"A. Pesetski, J. Baumgardner, J. Murduck, Eric N. Folk, J. Przybysz, J. Adam, Hong Zhang, J. Verspecht, D. Barataud, J. Teyssier, J. Nebus, Choongeol Cho, P. Hale, D. I. Bergman, D. Keenan, Nazia Akil, B. Grossman, H. Arslan, Daljeet Singh, J. Randa, S. Sweeney, T. Mckay, D. Walker, D. Greenberg, J. Tao, Judah Mendez, G. A. Rezvani, J. Pekarik\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARFTG.2005.8373127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present results of an interlaboratory comparison of S-parameter and noise-parameter measurements performed on 0.12 µm gate-length CMOS transistors. Copies of the same device were measured at three different laboratories (IBM, NIST, RFMD), and the results were compared. Each of the laboratories used a different measurement method, although two used similar commercial systems. Effects of different calibration reference planes are shown. The devices measured have large values of |S11|, |S22|, and |Γopt|, and have very low minimum noise figures (below 0.2 dB) over some of the frequency range. For the most part, the measurements at the different laboratories are in reasonable agreement, though there are discrepancies. It is also evident that the noise performance of the devices is better than our ability to measure it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2005 66th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2005 66th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARFTG.2005.8373127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 66th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARFTG.2005.8373127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interlaboratory comparison of noise-parameter measurements on CMOS devices with 0.12 μm gate length
We present results of an interlaboratory comparison of S-parameter and noise-parameter measurements performed on 0.12 µm gate-length CMOS transistors. Copies of the same device were measured at three different laboratories (IBM, NIST, RFMD), and the results were compared. Each of the laboratories used a different measurement method, although two used similar commercial systems. Effects of different calibration reference planes are shown. The devices measured have large values of |S11|, |S22|, and |Γopt|, and have very low minimum noise figures (below 0.2 dB) over some of the frequency range. For the most part, the measurements at the different laboratories are in reasonable agreement, though there are discrepancies. It is also evident that the noise performance of the devices is better than our ability to measure it.