一种新的层间介电裂纹破坏机制

Haiyan Liu, Xiangyang Li, Sean Xu, Jun Li
{"title":"一种新的层间介电裂纹破坏机制","authors":"Haiyan Liu, Xiangyang Li, Sean Xu, Jun Li","doi":"10.1109/EPTC.2018.8654345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Converting gold wire to copper wire for IC packaging is a big trend recently which has both advantage and disadvantage. Cu wire is good for packaging cost saving to current semiconductor industry, but it may also create quality and reliability issues. Since Cu is much harder and stiffer material than Au, it may require a greater force and USG power to insure good bonding to pad, and a larger bond force and USG power in turn increases the risk of ILD crack during the bonding process. The wafer tech in this study is CMOS40nm, Al thickness is 28KA, with 53um pad opening. The ILD crack mechanism which is discussed in this paper is different. The failure mode during ATE test is leakage failure. After de-cap and cratering test, there is no cratering / damage on failed pad under microscope check. FIB was performed on failed pad and confirmed the damage between Metal 2 and Metal 3, and no damage on top metal. The link between IV curve trace and ILD crack was studied. The root cause of the ILD crack was studied, material and machine variation were also take into consideration. Parameter optimization DOE was done. Key wire bond parameters include the initial force, USG power etc. The wire pull, ball shear, IMC, Al remnant etc. are key response. The result shows that lower USG and higher initial force can get better wire bond performance. The die was packaged into a MAPBGA package. Electrical test was performed on the assembled parts at T0, post MSL3/260degree C, post 264h UHST $(110 ^{\\circ}\\mathrm{C} /85$%RH), and post TC700cycles ($- 55 ^{\\circ}\\mathrm{C}$ to $150 ^{\\circ}\\mathrm{C})$. All units post stress clean passed without any failure. The overall leakage failure rate at ATE test is reduced.","PeriodicalId":360239,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 20th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Failure Mechanism of Inter Layer Dielectric Crack\",\"authors\":\"Haiyan Liu, Xiangyang Li, Sean Xu, Jun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EPTC.2018.8654345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Converting gold wire to copper wire for IC packaging is a big trend recently which has both advantage and disadvantage. Cu wire is good for packaging cost saving to current semiconductor industry, but it may also create quality and reliability issues. Since Cu is much harder and stiffer material than Au, it may require a greater force and USG power to insure good bonding to pad, and a larger bond force and USG power in turn increases the risk of ILD crack during the bonding process. The wafer tech in this study is CMOS40nm, Al thickness is 28KA, with 53um pad opening. The ILD crack mechanism which is discussed in this paper is different. The failure mode during ATE test is leakage failure. After de-cap and cratering test, there is no cratering / damage on failed pad under microscope check. FIB was performed on failed pad and confirmed the damage between Metal 2 and Metal 3, and no damage on top metal. The link between IV curve trace and ILD crack was studied. The root cause of the ILD crack was studied, material and machine variation were also take into consideration. Parameter optimization DOE was done. Key wire bond parameters include the initial force, USG power etc. The wire pull, ball shear, IMC, Al remnant etc. are key response. The result shows that lower USG and higher initial force can get better wire bond performance. The die was packaged into a MAPBGA package. Electrical test was performed on the assembled parts at T0, post MSL3/260degree C, post 264h UHST $(110 ^{\\\\circ}\\\\mathrm{C} /85$%RH), and post TC700cycles ($- 55 ^{\\\\circ}\\\\mathrm{C}$ to $150 ^{\\\\circ}\\\\mathrm{C})$. All units post stress clean passed without any failure. The overall leakage failure rate at ATE test is reduced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 20th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 20th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2018.8654345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 20th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2018.8654345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

IC封装用金线转铜线是近年来的一个大趋势,这既有优点也有缺点。铜线对于目前的半导体行业来说是节省封装成本的好方法,但它也可能产生质量和可靠性问题。由于Cu是比Au更硬、更硬的材料,因此可能需要更大的力和USG功率来确保与焊盘的良好粘合,而更大的粘合力和USG功率反过来又增加了粘合过程中ILD裂纹的风险。本研究晶圆工艺为CMOS40nm, Al厚度为28KA,焊片开口为53um。本文讨论的ILD裂纹机理是不同的。ATE试验时的失效模式为泄漏失效。经过脱帽和破洞试验,显微镜下检查失效焊盘无破洞/破损。对失效焊盘进行FIB分析,确认金属2和金属3之间有损伤,顶部金属无损伤。研究了IV曲线轨迹与ILD裂纹之间的联系。研究了产生ILD裂纹的根本原因,并考虑了材料和机器的变化。进行了DOE参数优化。关键的线键参数包括初始力、USG功率等。拉丝、球剪、IMC、Al残余等是关键的响应。结果表明,减小USG和增大初始力可以获得较好的丝键性能。该模具被封装到MAPBGA封装中。在T0, msl3 /260°C后,264h后UHST $(110 ^{\circ}\ mathm {C} /85$%RH)和tc700循环($- 55 ^{\circ}\ mathm {C}$至$150 ^{\circ}\ mathm {C})$下对组装的部件进行电气测试。各单元后应力清洁通过,无任何故障。降低了ATE试验的总泄漏故障率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A New Failure Mechanism of Inter Layer Dielectric Crack
Converting gold wire to copper wire for IC packaging is a big trend recently which has both advantage and disadvantage. Cu wire is good for packaging cost saving to current semiconductor industry, but it may also create quality and reliability issues. Since Cu is much harder and stiffer material than Au, it may require a greater force and USG power to insure good bonding to pad, and a larger bond force and USG power in turn increases the risk of ILD crack during the bonding process. The wafer tech in this study is CMOS40nm, Al thickness is 28KA, with 53um pad opening. The ILD crack mechanism which is discussed in this paper is different. The failure mode during ATE test is leakage failure. After de-cap and cratering test, there is no cratering / damage on failed pad under microscope check. FIB was performed on failed pad and confirmed the damage between Metal 2 and Metal 3, and no damage on top metal. The link between IV curve trace and ILD crack was studied. The root cause of the ILD crack was studied, material and machine variation were also take into consideration. Parameter optimization DOE was done. Key wire bond parameters include the initial force, USG power etc. The wire pull, ball shear, IMC, Al remnant etc. are key response. The result shows that lower USG and higher initial force can get better wire bond performance. The die was packaged into a MAPBGA package. Electrical test was performed on the assembled parts at T0, post MSL3/260degree C, post 264h UHST $(110 ^{\circ}\mathrm{C} /85$%RH), and post TC700cycles ($- 55 ^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ to $150 ^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$. All units post stress clean passed without any failure. The overall leakage failure rate at ATE test is reduced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信