税务犯罪是伤害犯罪还是危险犯罪,仅仅是行为犯罪还是结果犯罪,形式犯罪还是物质犯罪?概念性讨论如何转移人们对真正重要的东西的注意力:第24号有约束力的总结的理由etre

Heloisa Estellita, Marcelo Costenaro Cavali
{"title":"税务犯罪是伤害犯罪还是危险犯罪,仅仅是行为犯罪还是结果犯罪,形式犯罪还是物质犯罪?概念性讨论如何转移人们对真正重要的东西的注意力:第24号有约束力的总结的理由etre","authors":"Heloisa Estellita, Marcelo Costenaro Cavali","doi":"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p353-370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brazilian Supreme Court’s Binding Ruling nº 24 has caused a series of unwanted effects in the criminal and criminal procedural treatment of tax crimes. The most recent arises in a discussion about the classification of tax crimes as formal or material offenses in the Brazilian Supreme Court (ADI 4.980) and in the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (Special Appeal nº 1.982.304). In this article, the authors argue that this classification is irrelevant for the purposes of the application of the Binding Ruling nº 24 as well as for the determination of the initial term of the statute of limitations (art. 111, I, Penal Code).","PeriodicalId":159774,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crimes tributários são crimes de lesão ou de perigo, de mera conduta ou de resultado, formais ou materiais? Como uma discussão conceitual desvia o olhar do que realmente importa: a razão de ser da Súmula Vinculante nº 24\",\"authors\":\"Heloisa Estellita, Marcelo Costenaro Cavali\",\"doi\":\"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p353-370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Brazilian Supreme Court’s Binding Ruling nº 24 has caused a series of unwanted effects in the criminal and criminal procedural treatment of tax crimes. The most recent arises in a discussion about the classification of tax crimes as formal or material offenses in the Brazilian Supreme Court (ADI 4.980) and in the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (Special Appeal nº 1.982.304). In this article, the authors argue that this classification is irrelevant for the purposes of the application of the Binding Ruling nº 24 as well as for the determination of the initial term of the statute of limitations (art. 111, I, Penal Code).\",\"PeriodicalId\":159774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p353-370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p353-370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴西最高法院第24号具有约束力的裁决在税务犯罪的刑事和刑事程序处理中造成了一系列意想不到的影响。最近的争论出现在巴西最高法院(ADI 4.980)和巴西高等法院(第1.982.304号特别上诉)关于将税务犯罪分类为正式犯罪或重大犯罪的讨论中。在这篇文章中,发件人认为,这种分类与适用第24条具有约束力的裁决以及确定诉讼时效的初始期限的目的无关(第2条)。《刑法典》第111条第1款)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crimes tributários são crimes de lesão ou de perigo, de mera conduta ou de resultado, formais ou materiais? Como uma discussão conceitual desvia o olhar do que realmente importa: a razão de ser da Súmula Vinculante nº 24
Brazilian Supreme Court’s Binding Ruling nº 24 has caused a series of unwanted effects in the criminal and criminal procedural treatment of tax crimes. The most recent arises in a discussion about the classification of tax crimes as formal or material offenses in the Brazilian Supreme Court (ADI 4.980) and in the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (Special Appeal nº 1.982.304). In this article, the authors argue that this classification is irrelevant for the purposes of the application of the Binding Ruling nº 24 as well as for the determination of the initial term of the statute of limitations (art. 111, I, Penal Code).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信