自然对流环境下单组分和多组分印刷电路板数值传热预测的实验验证

P. Rodgers, V. Eveloy, J. Lohan, Carl-Magnus Fager, P. Tiilikka, J. Rantala
{"title":"自然对流环境下单组分和多组分印刷电路板数值传热预测的实验验证","authors":"P. Rodgers, V. Eveloy, J. Lohan, Carl-Magnus Fager, P. Tiilikka, J. Rantala","doi":"10.1109/STHERM.1999.762429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing power densities and changing component design have increased the need for accurate prediction of temperature effects that may affect system performance or reliability. To highlight these aspects early in the product development cycle, designers resort to using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based numerical predictive tools. However, users acknowledge that these predictions require experimental verification which is now readily available during the early design phase. Therefore, a need exists to establish well-defined benchmark test cases to help establish confidence in both modelling methodology and numerical tools. This paper presents such information for three package types (SO16, TSOP48, and PQFP208) which are evaluated on single and multi-component PCBs. Benchmark criteria are based on the prediction of steady state component junction temperature and associated component-PCB surface temperature gradients, which are both compared with experimental measurements. While the detailed numerical models typically predicted junction temperature to within 4/spl deg/C, discrepancies as great as 9/spl deg/C were also recorded. The sensitivity of prediction accuracy was assessed against discretization level and both the thermal conductivity and geometry of package materials. Hence it was considered important that all experimental and numerical modelling details be provided for reference.","PeriodicalId":253023,"journal":{"name":"Fifteenth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36306)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental validation of numerical heat transfer predictions for singleand multi-component printed circuit boards in natural convection environments\",\"authors\":\"P. Rodgers, V. Eveloy, J. Lohan, Carl-Magnus Fager, P. Tiilikka, J. Rantala\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STHERM.1999.762429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasing power densities and changing component design have increased the need for accurate prediction of temperature effects that may affect system performance or reliability. To highlight these aspects early in the product development cycle, designers resort to using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based numerical predictive tools. However, users acknowledge that these predictions require experimental verification which is now readily available during the early design phase. Therefore, a need exists to establish well-defined benchmark test cases to help establish confidence in both modelling methodology and numerical tools. This paper presents such information for three package types (SO16, TSOP48, and PQFP208) which are evaluated on single and multi-component PCBs. Benchmark criteria are based on the prediction of steady state component junction temperature and associated component-PCB surface temperature gradients, which are both compared with experimental measurements. While the detailed numerical models typically predicted junction temperature to within 4/spl deg/C, discrepancies as great as 9/spl deg/C were also recorded. The sensitivity of prediction accuracy was assessed against discretization level and both the thermal conductivity and geometry of package materials. Hence it was considered important that all experimental and numerical modelling details be provided for reference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifteenth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36306)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifteenth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36306)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STHERM.1999.762429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifteenth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36306)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STHERM.1999.762429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

不断增加的功率密度和不断变化的组件设计增加了对可能影响系统性能或可靠性的温度效应的准确预测的需求。为了在产品开发周期的早期突出这些方面,设计人员求助于基于计算流体动力学(CFD)的数值预测工具。然而,用户承认,这些预测需要实验验证,现在很容易在早期设计阶段。因此,需要建立良好定义的基准测试用例,以帮助建立对建模方法和数值工具的信心。本文介绍了三种封装类型(SO16, TSOP48和PQFP208)的此类信息,这些信息在单组件和多组件pcb上进行评估。基准准则是基于稳态元件结温和相关元件- pcb表面温度梯度的预测,并将其与实验测量结果进行比较。虽然详细的数值模型通常预测结温在4/spl°C以内,但也记录了高达9/spl°C的差异。根据离散化程度和封装材料的热导率及几何形状对预测精度的敏感性进行了评估。因此,必须提供所有实验和数值模拟细节以供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental validation of numerical heat transfer predictions for singleand multi-component printed circuit boards in natural convection environments
Increasing power densities and changing component design have increased the need for accurate prediction of temperature effects that may affect system performance or reliability. To highlight these aspects early in the product development cycle, designers resort to using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based numerical predictive tools. However, users acknowledge that these predictions require experimental verification which is now readily available during the early design phase. Therefore, a need exists to establish well-defined benchmark test cases to help establish confidence in both modelling methodology and numerical tools. This paper presents such information for three package types (SO16, TSOP48, and PQFP208) which are evaluated on single and multi-component PCBs. Benchmark criteria are based on the prediction of steady state component junction temperature and associated component-PCB surface temperature gradients, which are both compared with experimental measurements. While the detailed numerical models typically predicted junction temperature to within 4/spl deg/C, discrepancies as great as 9/spl deg/C were also recorded. The sensitivity of prediction accuracy was assessed against discretization level and both the thermal conductivity and geometry of package materials. Hence it was considered important that all experimental and numerical modelling details be provided for reference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信