现实系统精确安全分析的改进方法

V. Prasanth, R. Parekhji, B. Amrutur
{"title":"现实系统精确安全分析的改进方法","authors":"V. Prasanth, R. Parekhji, B. Amrutur","doi":"10.1109/ATS.2015.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrated circuits are being used in different applications which are not always known at the time of specification and design creation. Safety standards specify that certain design processes be followed to guarantee safety of the applications in which these circuits are being used. As a result, the design phase is followed (often mandated) by an evaluation phase, wherein the safety worthiness of the circuit must be ascertained. In this paper, we perform a detailed study of such an evaluation as practised in the industry, understand the limitations, and propose techniques to improve the existing methodology. The improvements proposed are: (i) Capturing workload diversity as input constraints (values and sequence). (ii) Modelling application specific performance tolerance. (iii) Illustrating how physical system can be included into this analysis using a suitable representation. (iv) Budgeting of tolerance across various interacting modules to reduce computational complexity of safety analysis. Experimental results to illustrate suitability of the proposed methods are presented using a set of ITC benchmark circuits and two representative industrial circuits.","PeriodicalId":256879,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 24th Asian Test Symposium (ATS)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Methods for Accurate Safety Analysis of Real-Life Systems\",\"authors\":\"V. Prasanth, R. Parekhji, B. Amrutur\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ATS.2015.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Integrated circuits are being used in different applications which are not always known at the time of specification and design creation. Safety standards specify that certain design processes be followed to guarantee safety of the applications in which these circuits are being used. As a result, the design phase is followed (often mandated) by an evaluation phase, wherein the safety worthiness of the circuit must be ascertained. In this paper, we perform a detailed study of such an evaluation as practised in the industry, understand the limitations, and propose techniques to improve the existing methodology. The improvements proposed are: (i) Capturing workload diversity as input constraints (values and sequence). (ii) Modelling application specific performance tolerance. (iii) Illustrating how physical system can be included into this analysis using a suitable representation. (iv) Budgeting of tolerance across various interacting modules to reduce computational complexity of safety analysis. Experimental results to illustrate suitability of the proposed methods are presented using a set of ITC benchmark circuits and two representative industrial circuits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 24th Asian Test Symposium (ATS)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 24th Asian Test Symposium (ATS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATS.2015.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 24th Asian Test Symposium (ATS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATS.2015.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

集成电路被用于不同的应用,在规范和设计创作时并不总是知道。安全标准规定了必须遵循的某些设计过程,以保证使用这些电路的应用的安全性。因此,设计阶段(通常是强制性的)之后是评估阶段,其中必须确定电路的安全价值。在本文中,我们对行业中实践的这种评估进行了详细的研究,了解了局限性,并提出了改进现有方法的技术。建议的改进是:(i)捕捉工作量多样性作为输入限制(值和顺序)。(ii)模拟特定应用程序的性能容忍度。(iii)说明如何使用合适的表示将物理系统纳入此分析。为各种相互作用的模块编制公差预算,以减少安全分析的计算复杂性。利用一组ITC基准电路和两个具有代表性的工业电路,给出了实验结果来说明所提出方法的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved Methods for Accurate Safety Analysis of Real-Life Systems
Integrated circuits are being used in different applications which are not always known at the time of specification and design creation. Safety standards specify that certain design processes be followed to guarantee safety of the applications in which these circuits are being used. As a result, the design phase is followed (often mandated) by an evaluation phase, wherein the safety worthiness of the circuit must be ascertained. In this paper, we perform a detailed study of such an evaluation as practised in the industry, understand the limitations, and propose techniques to improve the existing methodology. The improvements proposed are: (i) Capturing workload diversity as input constraints (values and sequence). (ii) Modelling application specific performance tolerance. (iii) Illustrating how physical system can be included into this analysis using a suitable representation. (iv) Budgeting of tolerance across various interacting modules to reduce computational complexity of safety analysis. Experimental results to illustrate suitability of the proposed methods are presented using a set of ITC benchmark circuits and two representative industrial circuits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信