{"title":"用于高速测试的探针点插入","authors":"E. Rudnick, V. Chickermane, J. Patel","doi":"10.1109/VTEST.1992.232756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some recent studies show that an at-speed sequential or functional test is better than a test executed at lower speed. Design-for-testability approaches based on full scan, partial scan, or silicon-based solutions like Crosscheck achieve very high stuck-at fault coverage. However, in all these cases, the tests have to be applied at speeds lower than the operation speed. In this paper, a design-for-test method which permits at-speed testing is introduced. The method is based on probe point insertion for improved observability. Improvements in fault coverage were made for all 16 of the ISCAS-80 benchmark circuits studied. Fault coverages between 99% and 100% were obtained for six circuits, and 100% ATG efficiency achieved on all but two circuits.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":434977,"journal":{"name":"Digest of Papers. 1992 IEEE VLSI Test Symposium","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probe point insertion for at-speed test\",\"authors\":\"E. Rudnick, V. Chickermane, J. Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VTEST.1992.232756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some recent studies show that an at-speed sequential or functional test is better than a test executed at lower speed. Design-for-testability approaches based on full scan, partial scan, or silicon-based solutions like Crosscheck achieve very high stuck-at fault coverage. However, in all these cases, the tests have to be applied at speeds lower than the operation speed. In this paper, a design-for-test method which permits at-speed testing is introduced. The method is based on probe point insertion for improved observability. Improvements in fault coverage were made for all 16 of the ISCAS-80 benchmark circuits studied. Fault coverages between 99% and 100% were obtained for six circuits, and 100% ATG efficiency achieved on all but two circuits.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":434977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digest of Papers. 1992 IEEE VLSI Test Symposium\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digest of Papers. 1992 IEEE VLSI Test Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VTEST.1992.232756\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digest of Papers. 1992 IEEE VLSI Test Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VTEST.1992.232756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Some recent studies show that an at-speed sequential or functional test is better than a test executed at lower speed. Design-for-testability approaches based on full scan, partial scan, or silicon-based solutions like Crosscheck achieve very high stuck-at fault coverage. However, in all these cases, the tests have to be applied at speeds lower than the operation speed. In this paper, a design-for-test method which permits at-speed testing is introduced. The method is based on probe point insertion for improved observability. Improvements in fault coverage were made for all 16 of the ISCAS-80 benchmark circuits studied. Fault coverages between 99% and 100% were obtained for six circuits, and 100% ATG efficiency achieved on all but two circuits.<>