流行病时期的司法:对米纳斯吉拉斯州法院人身保护令判决的研究

Beatriz Quintão, Ludmila Ribeiro
{"title":"流行病时期的司法:对米纳斯吉拉斯州法院人身保护令判决的研究","authors":"Beatriz Quintão, Ludmila Ribeiro","doi":"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n1p95-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes how the Court of Justice of Minas Gerais is positing themselves regarding the Covid-19 pandemic, especially when considering the actions suggested by the National Council of Justice (CNJ). To this end, the habeas corpus decisions were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods, to identify the main outcomes, the arguments used for granting or denying the order, as well as the variables that influenced the person being held in custody. The results showed that the recommendations made by CNJ, regarding Covid-19, had little influence on the granting of freedom to those who had been taken into custody, as the number of releases was very low. In addition, the main factors that influenced the decisions were not those that were not the inmate comorbidities or the prison situation, but the subjectivity of judges and their perceptions about the crimes and the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":159774,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judiciário em tempos de pandemia: um estudo das decisões em habeas corpus do Tribunal de Justiça de Minas Gerais\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz Quintão, Ludmila Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n1p95-130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyzes how the Court of Justice of Minas Gerais is positing themselves regarding the Covid-19 pandemic, especially when considering the actions suggested by the National Council of Justice (CNJ). To this end, the habeas corpus decisions were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods, to identify the main outcomes, the arguments used for granting or denying the order, as well as the variables that influenced the person being held in custody. The results showed that the recommendations made by CNJ, regarding Covid-19, had little influence on the granting of freedom to those who had been taken into custody, as the number of releases was very low. In addition, the main factors that influenced the decisions were not those that were not the inmate comorbidities or the prison situation, but the subjectivity of judges and their perceptions about the crimes and the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n1p95-130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n1p95-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了米纳斯吉拉斯州法院如何对Covid-19大流行进行定位,特别是在考虑国家司法委员会(CNJ)建议的行动时。为此目的,使用定量和定性方法对人身保护令决定进行了分析,以确定主要结果、用于批准或拒绝该命令的论据以及影响被拘留者的可变因素。结果表明,CNJ就Covid-19提出的建议对给予被拘留者自由的影响不大,因为释放的人数非常少。此外,影响决定的主要因素不是囚犯的合并症或监狱情况,而是法官的主观性及其对罪行和大流行病的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judiciário em tempos de pandemia: um estudo das decisões em habeas corpus do Tribunal de Justiça de Minas Gerais
This study analyzes how the Court of Justice of Minas Gerais is positing themselves regarding the Covid-19 pandemic, especially when considering the actions suggested by the National Council of Justice (CNJ). To this end, the habeas corpus decisions were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods, to identify the main outcomes, the arguments used for granting or denying the order, as well as the variables that influenced the person being held in custody. The results showed that the recommendations made by CNJ, regarding Covid-19, had little influence on the granting of freedom to those who had been taken into custody, as the number of releases was very low. In addition, the main factors that influenced the decisions were not those that were not the inmate comorbidities or the prison situation, but the subjectivity of judges and their perceptions about the crimes and the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信