对题为《作为出路的方法论》的出版物进行了评论。hab博士发表的母性性学研究的研究方法和教育实践(Wrocław 2020)。Edyta Zierkiewicz发表在Ars Educandi 18/2021杂志上。

Martyna Pryszmont
{"title":"对题为《作为出路的方法论》的出版物进行了评论。hab博士发表的母性性学研究的研究方法和教育实践(Wrocław 2020)。Edyta Zierkiewicz发表在Ars Educandi 18/2021杂志上。","authors":"Martyna Pryszmont","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text is a polemic review of the publication entitled Methodology as a way out. Research approaches and educational practices in andragogical studies on motherhood (Wrocław 2020) published by dr hab. Edyta Zierkiewicz in the Ars Educandi magazine. The discussion is the result of a different methodological worldview of the author of the monograph and the author of the review. Nevertheless, the priority of this text is to express disagreement with the aggressive tone of the reviewer's statements, as well as the practices she uses to discredit the reviewed monograph.\n\n","PeriodicalId":147535,"journal":{"name":"Studia z Teorii Wychowania","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polemic with the review of the publication entitled Methodology as a way out. Research approaches and educational practices in andragogical studies on motherhood (Wrocław 2020) published by dr hab. Edyta Zierkiewicz in the journal Ars Educandi 18/2021.\",\"authors\":\"Martyna Pryszmont\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The text is a polemic review of the publication entitled Methodology as a way out. Research approaches and educational practices in andragogical studies on motherhood (Wrocław 2020) published by dr hab. Edyta Zierkiewicz in the Ars Educandi magazine. The discussion is the result of a different methodological worldview of the author of the monograph and the author of the review. Nevertheless, the priority of this text is to express disagreement with the aggressive tone of the reviewer's statements, as well as the practices she uses to discredit the reviewed monograph.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":147535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia z Teorii Wychowania\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia z Teorii Wychowania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z Teorii Wychowania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是对题为《作为出路的方法论》的出版物的一篇论战性评论。hab博士发表的母性性学研究的研究方法和教育实践(Wrocław 2020)。Edyta Zierkiewicz在Ars Educandi杂志上说。讨论是专著作者和综述作者方法论世界观不同的结果。尽管如此,本文的重点是表达对审稿人声明中咄咄逼人的语气的不同意见,以及她用来诋毁审稿专著的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polemic with the review of the publication entitled Methodology as a way out. Research approaches and educational practices in andragogical studies on motherhood (Wrocław 2020) published by dr hab. Edyta Zierkiewicz in the journal Ars Educandi 18/2021.
The text is a polemic review of the publication entitled Methodology as a way out. Research approaches and educational practices in andragogical studies on motherhood (Wrocław 2020) published by dr hab. Edyta Zierkiewicz in the Ars Educandi magazine. The discussion is the result of a different methodological worldview of the author of the monograph and the author of the review. Nevertheless, the priority of this text is to express disagreement with the aggressive tone of the reviewer's statements, as well as the practices she uses to discredit the reviewed monograph.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信