电子封装板位跌落试验的力学建模与分析

Junfeng Zhao, L. Garner
{"title":"电子封装板位跌落试验的力学建模与分析","authors":"Junfeng Zhao, L. Garner","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.2006.1645683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solder joint reliability (SJR) issues caused by drop impact have received more and more attention from the industry in recent years. To assess the SJR in drop shock, electronic packages are generally surface mounted on a printed circuit board (PCB) whose oscillations subject the solder joint to alternating tensile and compressive loads. Many factors may affect solder joint performance in a drop test, such as the component position on the drop test board, the test board parameters (pad definition, solder resist opening, etc.) and the shock pulse. This increases the difficulties in mechanical analysis of these events. Drop testing becomes more challenging than ever as environment-friendly Pb-free solder material replaces Pb based solder. Pb-free solder has been noted (Luke et al, 2005) for increasing the risk in shock due to changes in elastic modulus and IMC strength. The failure mechanism of solder joint in drop test is also diverse. To understand all these phenomena, mechanical modeling and analysis is carried out in this paper. The modeling results have been calibrated through comparison with experiment results. Drop test based on the popular JEDEC (JESD22-B111) board were analyzed to understand the implication of this test to the electronic package. Several observations about the testing method are made, which aid in understanding the drop test results and observations are made as to how this test might be improved. A modeling design of experiment (DOE) was done to study the key structural parameters including solder ball height, package stiffness, package thickness, ball pattern and package dimension. These results are helpful in understanding the package and board design parameters to most impact drop test performance and allow for improved performance by design","PeriodicalId":194969,"journal":{"name":"56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2006","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical modeling and analysis of board level drop test of electronic package\",\"authors\":\"Junfeng Zhao, L. Garner\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECTC.2006.1645683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Solder joint reliability (SJR) issues caused by drop impact have received more and more attention from the industry in recent years. To assess the SJR in drop shock, electronic packages are generally surface mounted on a printed circuit board (PCB) whose oscillations subject the solder joint to alternating tensile and compressive loads. Many factors may affect solder joint performance in a drop test, such as the component position on the drop test board, the test board parameters (pad definition, solder resist opening, etc.) and the shock pulse. This increases the difficulties in mechanical analysis of these events. Drop testing becomes more challenging than ever as environment-friendly Pb-free solder material replaces Pb based solder. Pb-free solder has been noted (Luke et al, 2005) for increasing the risk in shock due to changes in elastic modulus and IMC strength. The failure mechanism of solder joint in drop test is also diverse. To understand all these phenomena, mechanical modeling and analysis is carried out in this paper. The modeling results have been calibrated through comparison with experiment results. Drop test based on the popular JEDEC (JESD22-B111) board were analyzed to understand the implication of this test to the electronic package. Several observations about the testing method are made, which aid in understanding the drop test results and observations are made as to how this test might be improved. A modeling design of experiment (DOE) was done to study the key structural parameters including solder ball height, package stiffness, package thickness, ball pattern and package dimension. These results are helpful in understanding the package and board design parameters to most impact drop test performance and allow for improved performance by design\",\"PeriodicalId\":194969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2006\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2006\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2006.1645683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2006","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2006.1645683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

近年来,由于焊点跌落引起的焊点可靠性问题越来越受到业界的关注。为了评估跌落冲击下的SJR,电子封装通常表面安装在印刷电路板(PCB)上,其振荡使焊点承受交替的拉伸和压缩载荷。在跌落试验中,许多因素可能会影响焊点的性能,例如元器件在跌落试验板上的位置、试验板参数(焊盘定义、阻焊开口等)和冲击脉冲。这增加了对这些事件进行力学分析的难度。随着环保型无铅焊料取代铅基焊料,跌落测试变得比以往任何时候都更具挑战性。已经注意到(Luke等人,2005)由于弹性模量和IMC强度的变化而增加了冲击风险。跌落试验中焊点的失效机理也是多种多样的。为了理解这些现象,本文进行了力学建模和分析。通过与实验结果的比较,对模拟结果进行了校正。分析了基于流行的JEDEC (JESD22-B111)板的跌落测试,了解了该测试对电子封装的影响。对测试方法进行了一些观察,这些观察有助于理解跌落测试结果,并对如何改进该测试进行了观察。对焊球高度、封装刚度、封装厚度、焊球图案和封装尺寸等关键结构参数进行了实验建模设计。这些结果有助于理解大多数冲击跌落测试性能的封装和电路板设计参数,并允许通过设计改进性能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical modeling and analysis of board level drop test of electronic package
Solder joint reliability (SJR) issues caused by drop impact have received more and more attention from the industry in recent years. To assess the SJR in drop shock, electronic packages are generally surface mounted on a printed circuit board (PCB) whose oscillations subject the solder joint to alternating tensile and compressive loads. Many factors may affect solder joint performance in a drop test, such as the component position on the drop test board, the test board parameters (pad definition, solder resist opening, etc.) and the shock pulse. This increases the difficulties in mechanical analysis of these events. Drop testing becomes more challenging than ever as environment-friendly Pb-free solder material replaces Pb based solder. Pb-free solder has been noted (Luke et al, 2005) for increasing the risk in shock due to changes in elastic modulus and IMC strength. The failure mechanism of solder joint in drop test is also diverse. To understand all these phenomena, mechanical modeling and analysis is carried out in this paper. The modeling results have been calibrated through comparison with experiment results. Drop test based on the popular JEDEC (JESD22-B111) board were analyzed to understand the implication of this test to the electronic package. Several observations about the testing method are made, which aid in understanding the drop test results and observations are made as to how this test might be improved. A modeling design of experiment (DOE) was done to study the key structural parameters including solder ball height, package stiffness, package thickness, ball pattern and package dimension. These results are helpful in understanding the package and board design parameters to most impact drop test performance and allow for improved performance by design
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信