初始栅漏在超薄SiO/ sub2 /中-短暂应力的作用

K.P. Cheung
{"title":"初始栅漏在超薄SiO/ sub2 /中-短暂应力的作用","authors":"K.P. Cheung","doi":"10.1109/PPID.2003.1200938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For ultra thin oxide, the preferred plasma charging damage detection method has been narrowed down to initial gate leakage. The initial gate leakage measurement can in principle distinguish stress-induced-leakage-current (SILC) from soft breakdown if the test device is small. In a previous report, we showed that the expected sharp distinction between broken devices and non-broken devices does not exist when several devices are measured for very thin oxide. Here, the explanation for the lack of sharp distinction between broken and non-broken devices is provided with the support of new data. It is clear that there is a basic difference between plasma charging stress and bench-top electrical stress of ultra thin oxide. The results indicate that, to obtain a better measure of plasma charging damage using gate leakage, a brief stress is necessary.","PeriodicalId":196923,"journal":{"name":"2003 8th International Symposium Plasma- and Process-Induced Damage.","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial gate leakage in ultra thin SiO/sub 2/ - the role of a brief stress\",\"authors\":\"K.P. Cheung\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PPID.2003.1200938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For ultra thin oxide, the preferred plasma charging damage detection method has been narrowed down to initial gate leakage. The initial gate leakage measurement can in principle distinguish stress-induced-leakage-current (SILC) from soft breakdown if the test device is small. In a previous report, we showed that the expected sharp distinction between broken devices and non-broken devices does not exist when several devices are measured for very thin oxide. Here, the explanation for the lack of sharp distinction between broken and non-broken devices is provided with the support of new data. It is clear that there is a basic difference between plasma charging stress and bench-top electrical stress of ultra thin oxide. The results indicate that, to obtain a better measure of plasma charging damage using gate leakage, a brief stress is necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2003 8th International Symposium Plasma- and Process-Induced Damage.\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2003 8th International Symposium Plasma- and Process-Induced Damage.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PPID.2003.1200938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 8th International Symposium Plasma- and Process-Induced Damage.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PPID.2003.1200938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对于超薄氧化物,首选的等离子体充电损伤检测方法已缩小到初始栅极泄漏。在试验装置较小的情况下,初始栅极泄漏测量原则上可以区分应力诱发泄漏电流和软击穿。在之前的报告中,我们表明,当对非常薄的氧化物测量多个器件时,不存在预期的破碎器件和非破碎器件之间的明显区别。在这里,在新数据的支持下,解释了对损坏和未损坏设备缺乏明确区分的原因。很明显,等离子体充电应力与超薄氧化物的台式电应力之间存在着根本的区别。结果表明,为了更好地利用栅极泄漏测量等离子体充电损伤,需要进行短暂的应力测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial gate leakage in ultra thin SiO/sub 2/ - the role of a brief stress
For ultra thin oxide, the preferred plasma charging damage detection method has been narrowed down to initial gate leakage. The initial gate leakage measurement can in principle distinguish stress-induced-leakage-current (SILC) from soft breakdown if the test device is small. In a previous report, we showed that the expected sharp distinction between broken devices and non-broken devices does not exist when several devices are measured for very thin oxide. Here, the explanation for the lack of sharp distinction between broken and non-broken devices is provided with the support of new data. It is clear that there is a basic difference between plasma charging stress and bench-top electrical stress of ultra thin oxide. The results indicate that, to obtain a better measure of plasma charging damage using gate leakage, a brief stress is necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信