根据第7条,无明文不为罪。《欧洲人权公约》*

B. Moura
{"title":"根据第7条,无明文不为罪。《欧洲人权公约》*","authors":"B. Moura","doi":"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p371-394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principle that only the law can define a crime and prescribe a penalty is a modern civilizational achievement of different societies affiliated with the legal culture of civil law. However, its real meaning and effective scope are put to the test in the field of International Criminal Law, which is heavily influenced by common law traditions. This article seeks to analyze the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on this matter. The aim is to highlight not only points of approximation or convergence with the most current approach to that guarantee within the framework of continental law, but also points of distancing or fragility, especially oscillations regarding the requirements of the “quality of law”.","PeriodicalId":159774,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege à luz do artigo 7.º da Convenção Europeia dos Direitos do Homem*\",\"authors\":\"B. Moura\",\"doi\":\"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p371-394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The principle that only the law can define a crime and prescribe a penalty is a modern civilizational achievement of different societies affiliated with the legal culture of civil law. However, its real meaning and effective scope are put to the test in the field of International Criminal Law, which is heavily influenced by common law traditions. This article seeks to analyze the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on this matter. The aim is to highlight not only points of approximation or convergence with the most current approach to that guarantee within the framework of continental law, but also points of distancing or fragility, especially oscillations regarding the requirements of the “quality of law”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p371-394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p371-394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

只有法律才能界定犯罪和规定刑罚的原则,是依附于民法法律文化的不同社会的现代文明成果。然而,它的真正意义和有效范围在深受普通法传统影响的国际刑法领域受到考验。本文试图分析欧洲人权法院在这一问题上的判例法。其目的不仅是突出在大陆法框架内对这种保证的最新做法的近似点或趋同点,而且也突出距离点或脆弱性点,特别是关于“法律质量”要求的波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege à luz do artigo 7.º da Convenção Europeia dos Direitos do Homem*
The principle that only the law can define a crime and prescribe a penalty is a modern civilizational achievement of different societies affiliated with the legal culture of civil law. However, its real meaning and effective scope are put to the test in the field of International Criminal Law, which is heavily influenced by common law traditions. This article seeks to analyze the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on this matter. The aim is to highlight not only points of approximation or convergence with the most current approach to that guarantee within the framework of continental law, but also points of distancing or fragility, especially oscillations regarding the requirements of the “quality of law”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信