微处理器核心

A. Burdass, G. Campbell, R. Grisenthwaite, D. Gwilt, P. Harrod, R. York
{"title":"微处理器核心","authors":"A. Burdass, G. Campbell, R. Grisenthwaite, D. Gwilt, P. Harrod, R. York","doi":"10.1109/ETW.2000.873774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares and contrast two very different approaches to testing cached CPU macrocells that are typically embedded in a System on Chip (SoC). One uses a test bus to apply functional vectors, while the other uses a combination of scan insertion, memory BIST and test collars. IP protection issues and nonintrusive tracing are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":255826,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE European Test Workshop","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microprocessor cores\",\"authors\":\"A. Burdass, G. Campbell, R. Grisenthwaite, D. Gwilt, P. Harrod, R. York\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ETW.2000.873774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares and contrast two very different approaches to testing cached CPU macrocells that are typically embedded in a System on Chip (SoC). One uses a test bus to apply functional vectors, while the other uses a combination of scan insertion, memory BIST and test collars. IP protection issues and nonintrusive tracing are also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE European Test Workshop\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE European Test Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETW.2000.873774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE European Test Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETW.2000.873774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文比较和对比了两种非常不同的方法来测试缓存的CPU宏单元,它们通常嵌入在片上系统(SoC)中。一个使用测试总线来应用功能向量,而另一个使用扫描插入,内存BIST和测试项圈的组合。还讨论了IP保护问题和非侵入式跟踪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microprocessor cores
This paper compares and contrast two very different approaches to testing cached CPU macrocells that are typically embedded in a System on Chip (SoC). One uses a test bus to apply functional vectors, while the other uses a combination of scan insertion, memory BIST and test collars. IP protection issues and nonintrusive tracing are also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信