W. Hughes, M. M. Kim, R. M. McGauley, D. Mortin, G. A. Serabo
{"title":"两级维护vs三级维护:成本","authors":"W. Hughes, M. M. Kim, R. M. McGauley, D. Mortin, G. A. Serabo","doi":"10.1109/AUTEST.1989.81093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors describe level-of-repair analyses for four major US Army weapon/communication systems using the Optimum Supply and Maintenance Model (OSAMM). The four systems are: Single Channel Objective Tactical Terminal (SCOTT); Global Positioning System (GPS); Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System (SINCGARS); and Hawk guided missile. The analyses compare the costs associated with a strict two-level maintenance concept with the resulting costs of other maintenance alternatives (e.g. three- and four-level, with and without screening). The authors identify the sensitivity of the resulting cost to such factors as inaccurate built-in test (BIT); TMDE (test measurement and diagnostic equipment) costs, including test program sets; provisioning levels and supply support measures, including number and placement of test equipment and maintenance personnel; and the impact of repair vs. discard. The cost of each policy is assessed not only in terms of dollars, but also in terms of operational availability and system readiness.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":321804,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Automatic Testing Conference.The Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Automatic Testing in the Next Decade and the 21st Century. Conference Record.","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two levels vs. three levels of maintenance: the cost\",\"authors\":\"W. Hughes, M. M. Kim, R. M. McGauley, D. Mortin, G. A. Serabo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUTEST.1989.81093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors describe level-of-repair analyses for four major US Army weapon/communication systems using the Optimum Supply and Maintenance Model (OSAMM). The four systems are: Single Channel Objective Tactical Terminal (SCOTT); Global Positioning System (GPS); Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System (SINCGARS); and Hawk guided missile. The analyses compare the costs associated with a strict two-level maintenance concept with the resulting costs of other maintenance alternatives (e.g. three- and four-level, with and without screening). The authors identify the sensitivity of the resulting cost to such factors as inaccurate built-in test (BIT); TMDE (test measurement and diagnostic equipment) costs, including test program sets; provisioning levels and supply support measures, including number and placement of test equipment and maintenance personnel; and the impact of repair vs. discard. The cost of each policy is assessed not only in terms of dollars, but also in terms of operational availability and system readiness.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Automatic Testing Conference.The Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Automatic Testing in the Next Decade and the 21st Century. Conference Record.\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Automatic Testing Conference.The Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Automatic Testing in the Next Decade and the 21st Century. Conference Record.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.1989.81093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Automatic Testing Conference.The Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Automatic Testing in the Next Decade and the 21st Century. Conference Record.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.1989.81093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Two levels vs. three levels of maintenance: the cost
The authors describe level-of-repair analyses for four major US Army weapon/communication systems using the Optimum Supply and Maintenance Model (OSAMM). The four systems are: Single Channel Objective Tactical Terminal (SCOTT); Global Positioning System (GPS); Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System (SINCGARS); and Hawk guided missile. The analyses compare the costs associated with a strict two-level maintenance concept with the resulting costs of other maintenance alternatives (e.g. three- and four-level, with and without screening). The authors identify the sensitivity of the resulting cost to such factors as inaccurate built-in test (BIT); TMDE (test measurement and diagnostic equipment) costs, including test program sets; provisioning levels and supply support measures, including number and placement of test equipment and maintenance personnel; and the impact of repair vs. discard. The cost of each policy is assessed not only in terms of dollars, but also in terms of operational availability and system readiness.<>