满足作战人员需要的电子战套件飞行线测试案例“打击任务态势感知问题”

K. Voigt, Kathleen R. Bendot
{"title":"满足作战人员需要的电子战套件飞行线测试案例“打击任务态势感知问题”","authors":"K. Voigt, Kathleen R. Bendot","doi":"10.1109/AUTEST.2002.1047957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Electronic Warfare Operational Advisory Group (EW, OAG) presented {again, this year} that a significant need has arisen from the war-fighter and user community to test and confirm the various EW systems in our operational platforms in a quick, efficient and cost effective manor. There are at least eleven (11) discrete threats identified which are 100% lethal against US tactical aircraft. Situational awareness on-board tactical aircraft is essential to our war-fighters' survival. We base this situational awareness on Radar Warning Receivers detecting and alerting the pilot of lethal threats in time to react to them, as well as an active jammer capability towards these and other threat signals. We have observed in numerous years of experience, with the current fleet of tactical aircraft, many tens of thousands of maintenance actions related to EW systems. The data on these actions reveal a multitude of system failures that went initially undetected or misdiagnosed. The result is at least unknown to the pilot that he has a reduced EW capability, in terms of range or as basic as actual functionality of these systems. This places the war-fighter at extreme risk for he expects these systems to perform when they, in fad, may not. It is easy to see the critical nature of this need of this surety. A flight line test concept would verify the systems effectiveness or at least its functionality. Functionality that escaped the system's or a subsystem's ability to detect through BIT. The continued experiences of inadequate BIT testing, both in the new systems but, more importantly, in the existing legacy systems is reality. These elements, in fact, are where the greatest occurrence of failures in the system performance and yet we have no method of detecting them on a real time, nonintrusive way. Mission accomplishment is placed at risk and lives in jeopardy.","PeriodicalId":372875,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings, IEEE AUTOTESTCON","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case for flight line testing of EW suites meeting the war fighter's need \\\"a strike mission situational awareness issue\\\"\",\"authors\":\"K. Voigt, Kathleen R. Bendot\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUTEST.2002.1047957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Electronic Warfare Operational Advisory Group (EW, OAG) presented {again, this year} that a significant need has arisen from the war-fighter and user community to test and confirm the various EW systems in our operational platforms in a quick, efficient and cost effective manor. There are at least eleven (11) discrete threats identified which are 100% lethal against US tactical aircraft. Situational awareness on-board tactical aircraft is essential to our war-fighters' survival. We base this situational awareness on Radar Warning Receivers detecting and alerting the pilot of lethal threats in time to react to them, as well as an active jammer capability towards these and other threat signals. We have observed in numerous years of experience, with the current fleet of tactical aircraft, many tens of thousands of maintenance actions related to EW systems. The data on these actions reveal a multitude of system failures that went initially undetected or misdiagnosed. The result is at least unknown to the pilot that he has a reduced EW capability, in terms of range or as basic as actual functionality of these systems. This places the war-fighter at extreme risk for he expects these systems to perform when they, in fad, may not. It is easy to see the critical nature of this need of this surety. A flight line test concept would verify the systems effectiveness or at least its functionality. Functionality that escaped the system's or a subsystem's ability to detect through BIT. The continued experiences of inadequate BIT testing, both in the new systems but, more importantly, in the existing legacy systems is reality. These elements, in fact, are where the greatest occurrence of failures in the system performance and yet we have no method of detecting them on a real time, nonintrusive way. Mission accomplishment is placed at risk and lives in jeopardy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings, IEEE AUTOTESTCON\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings, IEEE AUTOTESTCON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.2002.1047957\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings, IEEE AUTOTESTCON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.2002.1047957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子战作战咨询小组(EW, OAG)今年再次提出,作战人员和用户社区需要以快速、高效和经济的方式测试和确认我们作战平台中的各种电子战系统。至少有11种不同的威胁被确定,它们对美国战术飞机是100%致命的。战术飞机上的态势感知对我们作战人员的生存至关重要。我们将这种态势感知建立在雷达预警接收器的基础上,雷达预警接收器探测并及时向飞行员发出致命威胁警报,并对这些威胁信号和其他威胁信号进行主动干扰。根据多年的经验,我们观察到,在目前的战术飞机机队中,有数以万计的与电子战系统相关的维护行动。有关这些操作的数据揭示了大量最初未被发现或误诊的系统故障。结果至少是飞行员不知道他的电子战能力降低了,无论是在射程方面还是在这些系统的基本实际功能方面。这将使作战人员处于极端的风险之中,因为他们期望这些系统能够正常工作,而实际上这些系统可能无法正常工作。很容易看出对这种保证的需要的关键性质。飞行线测试概念将验证系统的有效性或至少其功能。逃避系统或子系统通过BIT检测能力的功能。无论是在新系统中,还是更重要的是在现有遗留系统中,持续存在的不充分的BIT测试经验都是现实。事实上,这些元素是系统性能中最容易出现故障的地方,但我们没有方法以实时、非侵入性的方式检测它们。任务的完成受到威胁,生命受到威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A case for flight line testing of EW suites meeting the war fighter's need "a strike mission situational awareness issue"
The Electronic Warfare Operational Advisory Group (EW, OAG) presented {again, this year} that a significant need has arisen from the war-fighter and user community to test and confirm the various EW systems in our operational platforms in a quick, efficient and cost effective manor. There are at least eleven (11) discrete threats identified which are 100% lethal against US tactical aircraft. Situational awareness on-board tactical aircraft is essential to our war-fighters' survival. We base this situational awareness on Radar Warning Receivers detecting and alerting the pilot of lethal threats in time to react to them, as well as an active jammer capability towards these and other threat signals. We have observed in numerous years of experience, with the current fleet of tactical aircraft, many tens of thousands of maintenance actions related to EW systems. The data on these actions reveal a multitude of system failures that went initially undetected or misdiagnosed. The result is at least unknown to the pilot that he has a reduced EW capability, in terms of range or as basic as actual functionality of these systems. This places the war-fighter at extreme risk for he expects these systems to perform when they, in fad, may not. It is easy to see the critical nature of this need of this surety. A flight line test concept would verify the systems effectiveness or at least its functionality. Functionality that escaped the system's or a subsystem's ability to detect through BIT. The continued experiences of inadequate BIT testing, both in the new systems but, more importantly, in the existing legacy systems is reality. These elements, in fact, are where the greatest occurrence of failures in the system performance and yet we have no method of detecting them on a real time, nonintrusive way. Mission accomplishment is placed at risk and lives in jeopardy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信