纳米制造实验室安全项目

H. Anderson, D. Bunzow, A. Gregg, J. Hughes, J. Kita, R. Morrison
{"title":"纳米制造实验室安全项目","authors":"H. Anderson, D. Bunzow, A. Gregg, J. Hughes, J. Kita, R. Morrison","doi":"10.1109/UGIM.2012.6247103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Nanofabrication laboratories have well established programs to protect the health and safety of researchers and the nearby communities, but programs to protect the security of reagents and hazardous process gases are just getting started, particularly at universities. Enforcement of security and export regulation has increased. A survey of 51 people (more than half lab managers) from at least 31 nanofabrication facilities explores their views on security threats. The top security concern is theft or diversion of dangerous chemicals. Half of US respondents either want more information or are unfamiliar with Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) though they all have chemicals covered by the regulations. Only 8% are highly confident that stolen or missing chemicals would be noticed within 24 hours of the incident. Other threats include theft of intellectual property, cyber security, the actions of anti-nanotechnology protesters and natural disasters. However, 24% of the respondents do not see any threat to the security of their laboratories. This presentation covers the results of the survey, a review of security threats, mitigation strategies, sources of information and outreach programs to enhance the security of laboratories. Also covered are regulatory issues related to security, including disclosure of restricted technology to foreign nationals in the U.S. (\"deemed exports\") and CFATS.","PeriodicalId":347838,"journal":{"name":"2012 19th Biennial University/Government/Industry, Micro/Nano Symposium (UGIM)","volume":"57 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nanofabrication Lab Security Project\",\"authors\":\"H. Anderson, D. Bunzow, A. Gregg, J. Hughes, J. Kita, R. Morrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/UGIM.2012.6247103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary form only given. Nanofabrication laboratories have well established programs to protect the health and safety of researchers and the nearby communities, but programs to protect the security of reagents and hazardous process gases are just getting started, particularly at universities. Enforcement of security and export regulation has increased. A survey of 51 people (more than half lab managers) from at least 31 nanofabrication facilities explores their views on security threats. The top security concern is theft or diversion of dangerous chemicals. Half of US respondents either want more information or are unfamiliar with Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) though they all have chemicals covered by the regulations. Only 8% are highly confident that stolen or missing chemicals would be noticed within 24 hours of the incident. Other threats include theft of intellectual property, cyber security, the actions of anti-nanotechnology protesters and natural disasters. However, 24% of the respondents do not see any threat to the security of their laboratories. This presentation covers the results of the survey, a review of security threats, mitigation strategies, sources of information and outreach programs to enhance the security of laboratories. Also covered are regulatory issues related to security, including disclosure of restricted technology to foreign nationals in the U.S. (\\\"deemed exports\\\") and CFATS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 19th Biennial University/Government/Industry, Micro/Nano Symposium (UGIM)\",\"volume\":\"57 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 19th Biennial University/Government/Industry, Micro/Nano Symposium (UGIM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/UGIM.2012.6247103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 19th Biennial University/Government/Industry, Micro/Nano Symposium (UGIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UGIM.2012.6247103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

只提供摘要形式。纳米制造实验室已经建立了良好的项目来保护研究人员和附近社区的健康和安全,但是保护试剂和危险过程气体安全的项目才刚刚开始,特别是在大学。加强了安全和出口管制的执行力度。一项对来自至少31个纳米制造设施的51人(超过一半的实验室管理人员)的调查探讨了他们对安全威胁的看法。最严重的安全问题是盗窃或转移危险化学品。一半的美国受访者要么想了解更多的信息,要么不熟悉化学设施反恐标准(CFATS),尽管这些标准都有规定涵盖的化学品。只有8%的人非常有信心在事故发生后24小时内发现被盗或丢失的化学品。其他威胁包括盗窃知识产权、网络安全、反纳米技术抗议者的行动和自然灾害。然而,24%的受访者认为其实验室的安全没有受到任何威胁。本报告涵盖了调查的结果、安全威胁的回顾、缓解策略、信息来源和加强实验室安全的推广计划。还涉及与安全相关的监管问题,包括向在美外国人披露受限制的技术(“视同出口”)和CFATS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nanofabrication Lab Security Project
Summary form only given. Nanofabrication laboratories have well established programs to protect the health and safety of researchers and the nearby communities, but programs to protect the security of reagents and hazardous process gases are just getting started, particularly at universities. Enforcement of security and export regulation has increased. A survey of 51 people (more than half lab managers) from at least 31 nanofabrication facilities explores their views on security threats. The top security concern is theft or diversion of dangerous chemicals. Half of US respondents either want more information or are unfamiliar with Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) though they all have chemicals covered by the regulations. Only 8% are highly confident that stolen or missing chemicals would be noticed within 24 hours of the incident. Other threats include theft of intellectual property, cyber security, the actions of anti-nanotechnology protesters and natural disasters. However, 24% of the respondents do not see any threat to the security of their laboratories. This presentation covers the results of the survey, a review of security threats, mitigation strategies, sources of information and outreach programs to enhance the security of laboratories. Also covered are regulatory issues related to security, including disclosure of restricted technology to foreign nationals in the U.S. ("deemed exports") and CFATS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信