J. Blais, T. Pilon, C. Robitaille, K. Bartholomew, V. Fischer
{"title":"通过优化和维持ADC分类器的性能,最大限度地减少在线计算的产量误差","authors":"J. Blais, T. Pilon, C. Robitaille, K. Bartholomew, V. Fischer","doi":"10.1109/ASMC.1999.798256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automatic defect classification (ADC) has become a standard tool to monitor and manage yield-limiting defects in the semiconductor industry. The ADC system is more productive than manual classification systems because of its greater accuracy, consistency, and throughput. Engineers have used it to assist in yield learning, monitoring for excursions, and making in-line yield predictions. Semiconductor manufactures use in-line yield predictions to adjust wafer starts and appropriately disposition lots. This paper explores the quality of the in-line defect-limited yield (DLY) prediction as a function of ADC system performance. When the ADC system is operating optimally, the in-line DLY error is minimized. Maintaining optimal system performance is a two-part project. First, system hardware must be appropriately calibrated and maintained. Secondly, the ADC classifier set-ups must be optimized. ADC classifier performance is measured with two values: accuracy and purity. The relationship between accuracy, purity, and error in the PLY calculation is described. Techniques to optimize classifier performance are discussed. Programmed defect standard wafers (PDSW) are a proven means to monitor the health of inspection tools. A particular PDSW, known as TDS, provides benefits over conventional PDSWs in that it may be used on a variety of inspection tools and is a challenging and sensitive measure of ADC performance. The improvement of in-line defect-limited yield caused by the implementation of the TDS is explored. The impact of in-line DLY prediction on overall fabricator productivity is also discussed.","PeriodicalId":424267,"journal":{"name":"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimizing in-line calculated yield errors by optimizing and maintaining ADC classifier performance\",\"authors\":\"J. Blais, T. Pilon, C. Robitaille, K. Bartholomew, V. Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASMC.1999.798256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automatic defect classification (ADC) has become a standard tool to monitor and manage yield-limiting defects in the semiconductor industry. The ADC system is more productive than manual classification systems because of its greater accuracy, consistency, and throughput. Engineers have used it to assist in yield learning, monitoring for excursions, and making in-line yield predictions. Semiconductor manufactures use in-line yield predictions to adjust wafer starts and appropriately disposition lots. This paper explores the quality of the in-line defect-limited yield (DLY) prediction as a function of ADC system performance. When the ADC system is operating optimally, the in-line DLY error is minimized. Maintaining optimal system performance is a two-part project. First, system hardware must be appropriately calibrated and maintained. Secondly, the ADC classifier set-ups must be optimized. ADC classifier performance is measured with two values: accuracy and purity. The relationship between accuracy, purity, and error in the PLY calculation is described. Techniques to optimize classifier performance are discussed. Programmed defect standard wafers (PDSW) are a proven means to monitor the health of inspection tools. A particular PDSW, known as TDS, provides benefits over conventional PDSWs in that it may be used on a variety of inspection tools and is a challenging and sensitive measure of ADC performance. The improvement of in-line defect-limited yield caused by the implementation of the TDS is explored. The impact of in-line DLY prediction on overall fabricator productivity is also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.1999.798256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.1999.798256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minimizing in-line calculated yield errors by optimizing and maintaining ADC classifier performance
Automatic defect classification (ADC) has become a standard tool to monitor and manage yield-limiting defects in the semiconductor industry. The ADC system is more productive than manual classification systems because of its greater accuracy, consistency, and throughput. Engineers have used it to assist in yield learning, monitoring for excursions, and making in-line yield predictions. Semiconductor manufactures use in-line yield predictions to adjust wafer starts and appropriately disposition lots. This paper explores the quality of the in-line defect-limited yield (DLY) prediction as a function of ADC system performance. When the ADC system is operating optimally, the in-line DLY error is minimized. Maintaining optimal system performance is a two-part project. First, system hardware must be appropriately calibrated and maintained. Secondly, the ADC classifier set-ups must be optimized. ADC classifier performance is measured with two values: accuracy and purity. The relationship between accuracy, purity, and error in the PLY calculation is described. Techniques to optimize classifier performance are discussed. Programmed defect standard wafers (PDSW) are a proven means to monitor the health of inspection tools. A particular PDSW, known as TDS, provides benefits over conventional PDSWs in that it may be used on a variety of inspection tools and is a challenging and sensitive measure of ADC performance. The improvement of in-line defect-limited yield caused by the implementation of the TDS is explored. The impact of in-line DLY prediction on overall fabricator productivity is also discussed.