通过优化和维持ADC分类器的性能,最大限度地减少在线计算的产量误差

J. Blais, T. Pilon, C. Robitaille, K. Bartholomew, V. Fischer
{"title":"通过优化和维持ADC分类器的性能,最大限度地减少在线计算的产量误差","authors":"J. Blais, T. Pilon, C. Robitaille, K. Bartholomew, V. Fischer","doi":"10.1109/ASMC.1999.798256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automatic defect classification (ADC) has become a standard tool to monitor and manage yield-limiting defects in the semiconductor industry. The ADC system is more productive than manual classification systems because of its greater accuracy, consistency, and throughput. Engineers have used it to assist in yield learning, monitoring for excursions, and making in-line yield predictions. Semiconductor manufactures use in-line yield predictions to adjust wafer starts and appropriately disposition lots. This paper explores the quality of the in-line defect-limited yield (DLY) prediction as a function of ADC system performance. When the ADC system is operating optimally, the in-line DLY error is minimized. Maintaining optimal system performance is a two-part project. First, system hardware must be appropriately calibrated and maintained. Secondly, the ADC classifier set-ups must be optimized. ADC classifier performance is measured with two values: accuracy and purity. The relationship between accuracy, purity, and error in the PLY calculation is described. Techniques to optimize classifier performance are discussed. Programmed defect standard wafers (PDSW) are a proven means to monitor the health of inspection tools. A particular PDSW, known as TDS, provides benefits over conventional PDSWs in that it may be used on a variety of inspection tools and is a challenging and sensitive measure of ADC performance. The improvement of in-line defect-limited yield caused by the implementation of the TDS is explored. The impact of in-line DLY prediction on overall fabricator productivity is also discussed.","PeriodicalId":424267,"journal":{"name":"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimizing in-line calculated yield errors by optimizing and maintaining ADC classifier performance\",\"authors\":\"J. Blais, T. Pilon, C. Robitaille, K. Bartholomew, V. Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASMC.1999.798256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automatic defect classification (ADC) has become a standard tool to monitor and manage yield-limiting defects in the semiconductor industry. The ADC system is more productive than manual classification systems because of its greater accuracy, consistency, and throughput. Engineers have used it to assist in yield learning, monitoring for excursions, and making in-line yield predictions. Semiconductor manufactures use in-line yield predictions to adjust wafer starts and appropriately disposition lots. This paper explores the quality of the in-line defect-limited yield (DLY) prediction as a function of ADC system performance. When the ADC system is operating optimally, the in-line DLY error is minimized. Maintaining optimal system performance is a two-part project. First, system hardware must be appropriately calibrated and maintained. Secondly, the ADC classifier set-ups must be optimized. ADC classifier performance is measured with two values: accuracy and purity. The relationship between accuracy, purity, and error in the PLY calculation is described. Techniques to optimize classifier performance are discussed. Programmed defect standard wafers (PDSW) are a proven means to monitor the health of inspection tools. A particular PDSW, known as TDS, provides benefits over conventional PDSWs in that it may be used on a variety of inspection tools and is a challenging and sensitive measure of ADC performance. The improvement of in-line defect-limited yield caused by the implementation of the TDS is explored. The impact of in-line DLY prediction on overall fabricator productivity is also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.1999.798256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.1999.798256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自动缺陷分类(ADC)已成为半导体行业监控和管理限制成品率缺陷的标准工具。ADC系统比人工分类系统效率更高,因为它具有更高的准确性、一致性和吞吐量。工程师们已经用它来帮助产量学习,监测偏差,并进行在线产量预测。半导体制造商使用在线良率预测来调整晶圆启动和适当配置批次。本文探讨了在线缺陷限制良率(DLY)预测的质量与ADC系统性能的关系。当ADC系统处于最佳工作状态时,直线直线误差最小。维护最佳系统性能是一个由两部分组成的项目。首先,必须对系统硬件进行适当的校准和维护。其次,必须优化ADC分类器的设置。ADC分类器的性能用两个值来衡量:准确度和纯度。描述了层压计算中精度、纯度和误差之间的关系。讨论了优化分类器性能的技术。程序缺陷标准晶圆(PDSW)是监测检测工具健康状况的一种行之有效的手段。一种特殊的PDSW,称为TDS,比传统的PDSW有更多的好处,因为它可以用于各种检测工具,是一种具有挑战性和敏感的ADC性能测量方法。探讨了TDS的实施对在线缺陷限制良率的提高。本文还讨论了在线动态预测对制造商整体生产率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimizing in-line calculated yield errors by optimizing and maintaining ADC classifier performance
Automatic defect classification (ADC) has become a standard tool to monitor and manage yield-limiting defects in the semiconductor industry. The ADC system is more productive than manual classification systems because of its greater accuracy, consistency, and throughput. Engineers have used it to assist in yield learning, monitoring for excursions, and making in-line yield predictions. Semiconductor manufactures use in-line yield predictions to adjust wafer starts and appropriately disposition lots. This paper explores the quality of the in-line defect-limited yield (DLY) prediction as a function of ADC system performance. When the ADC system is operating optimally, the in-line DLY error is minimized. Maintaining optimal system performance is a two-part project. First, system hardware must be appropriately calibrated and maintained. Secondly, the ADC classifier set-ups must be optimized. ADC classifier performance is measured with two values: accuracy and purity. The relationship between accuracy, purity, and error in the PLY calculation is described. Techniques to optimize classifier performance are discussed. Programmed defect standard wafers (PDSW) are a proven means to monitor the health of inspection tools. A particular PDSW, known as TDS, provides benefits over conventional PDSWs in that it may be used on a variety of inspection tools and is a challenging and sensitive measure of ADC performance. The improvement of in-line defect-limited yield caused by the implementation of the TDS is explored. The impact of in-line DLY prediction on overall fabricator productivity is also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信