{"title":"热氧化硅片的接触式和非接触式后cmp清洗","authors":"N. Moumen, M. Guarrera, C. Piboontum, A. Busnaina","doi":"10.1109/ASMC.1999.798236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-CMP cleaning of polished thermal oxide wafers is conducted using megasonic and brush cleaning techniques. The wafers were polished using Rodel silica based slurry. The results achieved by the two different cleaning methods are presented and compared. They show that although the two techniques produce comparable cleaning performance, non-contact cleaning using SCl produces lower defect counts on the cleaned wafers.","PeriodicalId":424267,"journal":{"name":"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contact and non contact post-CMP cleaning of thermal oxide silicon wafers\",\"authors\":\"N. Moumen, M. Guarrera, C. Piboontum, A. Busnaina\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASMC.1999.798236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Post-CMP cleaning of polished thermal oxide wafers is conducted using megasonic and brush cleaning techniques. The wafers were polished using Rodel silica based slurry. The results achieved by the two different cleaning methods are presented and compared. They show that although the two techniques produce comparable cleaning performance, non-contact cleaning using SCl produces lower defect counts on the cleaned wafers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.1999.798236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th Annual IEEE/SEMI. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 99 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36295)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.1999.798236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contact and non contact post-CMP cleaning of thermal oxide silicon wafers
Post-CMP cleaning of polished thermal oxide wafers is conducted using megasonic and brush cleaning techniques. The wafers were polished using Rodel silica based slurry. The results achieved by the two different cleaning methods are presented and compared. They show that although the two techniques produce comparable cleaning performance, non-contact cleaning using SCl produces lower defect counts on the cleaned wafers.