用XFEM、CZM和周动力学方法预测裂纹萌生和扩展的比较研究

2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC) Pub Date : 2010-06-01 DOI:10.1109/ECTC.2010.5490851

A. Agwai, I. Guven, E. Madenci

{"title":"用XFEM、CZM和周动力学方法预测裂纹萌生和扩展的比较研究","authors":"A. Agwai, I. Guven, E. Madenci","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.2010.5490851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.","PeriodicalId":429629,"journal":{"name":"2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting crack initiation and propagation using XFEM, CZM and peridynamics: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"A. Agwai, I. Guven, E. Madenci\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECTC.2010.5490851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)\",\"volume\":\"182 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2010.5490851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2010.5490851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 22

摘要

本文对扩展有限元(XFEM)、内聚区模型(CZM)和周动力理论(PD)进行了比较。通过与两个实验基准研究的比较，通过定性和定量观察证明了这些技术预测动态裂缝的能力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Predicting crack initiation and propagation using XFEM, CZM and peridynamics: A comparative study

This study presents a comparison of extended finite elements (XFEM), cohesive zone model (CZM) and the peridynamic theory (PD). By comparisons against two experimental benchmark studies, the capability of these techniques to predict dynamic fracture is demonstrated through both qualitative and quantitative observations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)

自引率

0.00%

发文量