无线射频模块集成无源器件技术的比较与分析

A. Kundu, M. Megahed, D. Schmidt
{"title":"无线射频模块集成无源器件技术的比较与分析","authors":"A. Kundu, M. Megahed, D. Schmidt","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.2008.4550046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have investigated the existing integrated passive device (IPD) technologies for cost effective IPD solutions for discrete radio frequency (RF) module. Based upon the investigation in terms of cost, size, performance & technology maturity, it comes out that silicon, glass & LTCC are the suitable technologies. We have designed IPDs using these technologies having same foot print to satisfy Intel Wi-MAX specs. Have taped out, validated the samples and made an electrical performance and cost comparison among three technologies. Result shows that Si_IPD & Glass_IPD both have well enough electrical performance required for Wi_MAX solution at lower cost and equivalent size compared to LTCC.","PeriodicalId":378788,"journal":{"name":"2008 58th Electronic Components and Technology Conference","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison and analysis of integrated passive device technologies for wireless radio frequency module\",\"authors\":\"A. Kundu, M. Megahed, D. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECTC.2008.4550046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have investigated the existing integrated passive device (IPD) technologies for cost effective IPD solutions for discrete radio frequency (RF) module. Based upon the investigation in terms of cost, size, performance & technology maturity, it comes out that silicon, glass & LTCC are the suitable technologies. We have designed IPDs using these technologies having same foot print to satisfy Intel Wi-MAX specs. Have taped out, validated the samples and made an electrical performance and cost comparison among three technologies. Result shows that Si_IPD & Glass_IPD both have well enough electrical performance required for Wi_MAX solution at lower cost and equivalent size compared to LTCC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 58th Electronic Components and Technology Conference\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 58th Electronic Components and Technology Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2008.4550046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 58th Electronic Components and Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2008.4550046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

我们研究了现有的集成无源器件(IPD)技术,为离散射频(RF)模块提供具有成本效益的IPD解决方案。通过对成本、尺寸、性能和技术成熟度的考察,得出硅、玻璃和LTCC是合适的技术。我们使用这些技术设计了ipd,具有相同的占地面积,以满足英特尔Wi-MAX规格。对样品进行了粘贴、验证,并对三种技术的电性能和成本进行了比较。结果表明,Si_IPD和Glass_IPD都具有较低成本和同等尺寸的Wi_MAX解决方案所需的足够好的电性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison and analysis of integrated passive device technologies for wireless radio frequency module
We have investigated the existing integrated passive device (IPD) technologies for cost effective IPD solutions for discrete radio frequency (RF) module. Based upon the investigation in terms of cost, size, performance & technology maturity, it comes out that silicon, glass & LTCC are the suitable technologies. We have designed IPDs using these technologies having same foot print to satisfy Intel Wi-MAX specs. Have taped out, validated the samples and made an electrical performance and cost comparison among three technologies. Result shows that Si_IPD & Glass_IPD both have well enough electrical performance required for Wi_MAX solution at lower cost and equivalent size compared to LTCC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信