针对3nm及以上节点的基于鳍片和基于薄片的互补FET器件和电路级评估

Liu Jiang, A. Pal, E. Bazizi, Mehdi Saremi, He Ren, B. Alexander, Buvna Ayyagari-Sangamalli
{"title":"针对3nm及以上节点的基于鳍片和基于薄片的互补FET器件和电路级评估","authors":"Liu Jiang, A. Pal, E. Bazizi, Mehdi Saremi, He Ren, B. Alexander, Buvna Ayyagari-Sangamalli","doi":"10.23919/SISPAD49475.2020.9241655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complementary FET (CFET), implemented by stacking NMOS and PMOS on top of each other, is considered as an emerging option to continue logic scaling beyond 3nm node. It can be configured with a fin-on-fin (fin-based CFET) or sheet-on-sheet (sheet-based CFET) structures. In this paper, we use 3D-TCAD simulation to compare those two configurations at both device and circuit levels. For accurate comparison between these two CFET configurations, we deploy a drift-diffusion simulation framework, calibrated to semi-classical sub-band BTE (Boltzmann Transport Equation). We show that for the same effective channel width, nMOS of sheet-based CFET has 10% higher drive-current compared to fin-based CFET. For pMOS, sheet-based CFET shows 5% lower drive-current compared to fin-based CFET. When compared for the same device footprint with increased nanosheet width, nMOS and pMOS sheet-based CFET shows 73% and 47% higher drive current respectively compared to fin-based CFET. Using 31-stage ring-oscillator as a representative circuit, we show that for the same electrical channel width, the circuit performance of the sheet-based CFET is 2.6% higher than the fin-based CFET at Vdd of 0.7V. When compared for the same device footprint, sheet-based CFET shows 9% higher circuit performance compared to the fin-based CFET.","PeriodicalId":206964,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD)","volume":"106 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complementary FET Device and Circuit Level Evaluation Using Fin-Based and Sheet-Based Configurations Targeting 3nm Node and Beyond\",\"authors\":\"Liu Jiang, A. Pal, E. Bazizi, Mehdi Saremi, He Ren, B. Alexander, Buvna Ayyagari-Sangamalli\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/SISPAD49475.2020.9241655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Complementary FET (CFET), implemented by stacking NMOS and PMOS on top of each other, is considered as an emerging option to continue logic scaling beyond 3nm node. It can be configured with a fin-on-fin (fin-based CFET) or sheet-on-sheet (sheet-based CFET) structures. In this paper, we use 3D-TCAD simulation to compare those two configurations at both device and circuit levels. For accurate comparison between these two CFET configurations, we deploy a drift-diffusion simulation framework, calibrated to semi-classical sub-band BTE (Boltzmann Transport Equation). We show that for the same effective channel width, nMOS of sheet-based CFET has 10% higher drive-current compared to fin-based CFET. For pMOS, sheet-based CFET shows 5% lower drive-current compared to fin-based CFET. When compared for the same device footprint with increased nanosheet width, nMOS and pMOS sheet-based CFET shows 73% and 47% higher drive current respectively compared to fin-based CFET. Using 31-stage ring-oscillator as a representative circuit, we show that for the same electrical channel width, the circuit performance of the sheet-based CFET is 2.6% higher than the fin-based CFET at Vdd of 0.7V. When compared for the same device footprint, sheet-based CFET shows 9% higher circuit performance compared to the fin-based CFET.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD)\",\"volume\":\"106 1-2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/SISPAD49475.2020.9241655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/SISPAD49475.2020.9241655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

互补FET (CFET)是一种将NMOS和PMOS堆叠在一起实现的技术,被认为是一种新兴的逻辑扩展方案,可以继续扩展到3nm节点以上。它可以配置鳍对鳍(基于鳍的CFET)或片对片(基于片的CFET)结构。在本文中,我们使用3D-TCAD仿真在器件和电路级别比较这两种配置。为了准确比较这两种CFET配置,我们部署了一个漂移扩散模拟框架,校准到半经典子带BTE(玻尔兹曼输运方程)。研究表明,在相同的有效沟道宽度下,片基CFET的nMOS驱动电流比鳍形CFET高10%。对于pMOS,基于薄片的CFET显示比基于鳍片的CFET低5%的驱动电流。在增加纳米片宽度的情况下,基于nMOS和pMOS片的cfeet的驱动电流分别比基于鳍片的cfeet高73%和47%。以31级环形振荡器为代表电路,我们发现在相同的电通道宽度下,在Vdd为0.7V时,基于薄片的CFET电路性能比基于鳍片的CFET电路性能高2.6%。当比较相同的器件面积时,基于薄片的CFET的电路性能比基于鳍片的CFET高9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complementary FET Device and Circuit Level Evaluation Using Fin-Based and Sheet-Based Configurations Targeting 3nm Node and Beyond
Complementary FET (CFET), implemented by stacking NMOS and PMOS on top of each other, is considered as an emerging option to continue logic scaling beyond 3nm node. It can be configured with a fin-on-fin (fin-based CFET) or sheet-on-sheet (sheet-based CFET) structures. In this paper, we use 3D-TCAD simulation to compare those two configurations at both device and circuit levels. For accurate comparison between these two CFET configurations, we deploy a drift-diffusion simulation framework, calibrated to semi-classical sub-band BTE (Boltzmann Transport Equation). We show that for the same effective channel width, nMOS of sheet-based CFET has 10% higher drive-current compared to fin-based CFET. For pMOS, sheet-based CFET shows 5% lower drive-current compared to fin-based CFET. When compared for the same device footprint with increased nanosheet width, nMOS and pMOS sheet-based CFET shows 73% and 47% higher drive current respectively compared to fin-based CFET. Using 31-stage ring-oscillator as a representative circuit, we show that for the same electrical channel width, the circuit performance of the sheet-based CFET is 2.6% higher than the fin-based CFET at Vdd of 0.7V. When compared for the same device footprint, sheet-based CFET shows 9% higher circuit performance compared to the fin-based CFET.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信