相声的仿真与计算

K. Mcclellan, T. S. Wailes, P. Franzon
{"title":"相声的仿真与计算","authors":"K. Mcclellan, T. S. Wailes, P. Franzon","doi":"10.1109/EPEP.1997.634055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A crosstalk model for high speed MCMs that is shown to be accurate is compared to simulating a design. Results are presented that show that even though the model is accurate, accurate results cannot be obtained without accounting for timing.","PeriodicalId":220951,"journal":{"name":"Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation vs calculation of crosstalk\",\"authors\":\"K. Mcclellan, T. S. Wailes, P. Franzon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EPEP.1997.634055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A crosstalk model for high speed MCMs that is shown to be accurate is compared to simulating a design. Results are presented that show that even though the model is accurate, accurate results cannot be obtained without accounting for timing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEP.1997.634055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEP.1997.634055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文将高速mcm串扰模型与仿真设计进行了比较。结果表明,即使该模型是准确的,但如果不考虑时间因素,也无法获得准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation vs calculation of crosstalk
A crosstalk model for high speed MCMs that is shown to be accurate is compared to simulating a design. Results are presented that show that even though the model is accurate, accurate results cannot be obtained without accounting for timing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信