噪声系数测量精度的统计分析

N. Otegi, J. Collantes, M. Sayed
{"title":"噪声系数测量精度的统计分析","authors":"N. Otegi, J. Collantes, M. Sayed","doi":"10.1109/ARFTG.2005.8373130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a growing trend to integrate noise figure measurement capabilities in microwave instruments originally devoted to other general purpose measurements as Vector Network Analyzers or Spectrum Analyzers. This opens up new possibilities to take into account vector corrections (at least in the case of VNA), or even to consider other techniques (such as cold-source) for computing the noise figure, different from the classical Y-factor approach used by most noise figure meters. In order to evaluate the suitability of these new options it is important to correctly analyze the benefits in terms of final accuracy that they can provide. However, errors in noise figure measurements have very different sources and nature, which sometimes do not allow straight forward conclusions on measurement accuracy. In this paper, a consistent evaluation of systematic errors and measurement uncertainty associated to different methodologies is presented. For that, the recommendations of the IEC-ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) are followed. Some representative examples are given to illustrate the interest of the analysis.","PeriodicalId":444012,"journal":{"name":"2005 66th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical analysis of accuracy in noise figure measurements\",\"authors\":\"N. Otegi, J. Collantes, M. Sayed\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARFTG.2005.8373130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a growing trend to integrate noise figure measurement capabilities in microwave instruments originally devoted to other general purpose measurements as Vector Network Analyzers or Spectrum Analyzers. This opens up new possibilities to take into account vector corrections (at least in the case of VNA), or even to consider other techniques (such as cold-source) for computing the noise figure, different from the classical Y-factor approach used by most noise figure meters. In order to evaluate the suitability of these new options it is important to correctly analyze the benefits in terms of final accuracy that they can provide. However, errors in noise figure measurements have very different sources and nature, which sometimes do not allow straight forward conclusions on measurement accuracy. In this paper, a consistent evaluation of systematic errors and measurement uncertainty associated to different methodologies is presented. For that, the recommendations of the IEC-ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) are followed. Some representative examples are given to illustrate the interest of the analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2005 66th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2005 66th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARFTG.2005.8373130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 66th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARFTG.2005.8373130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在微波仪器中集成噪声系数测量功能是一种日益增长的趋势,最初用于其他通用测量,如矢量网络分析仪或频谱分析仪。这开辟了新的可能性,考虑矢量校正(至少在VNA的情况下),甚至考虑其他技术(如冷源)来计算噪声系数,不同于大多数噪声系数计使用的经典y因子方法。为了评估这些新选项的适用性,正确分析它们所能提供的最终准确性的好处是很重要的。然而,噪声系数测量中的误差有非常不同的来源和性质,有时不能直接得出测量精度的结论。在本文中,提出了与不同方法相关的系统误差和测量不确定度的一致评估。为此,遵循IEC-ISO测量不确定度表达指南(GUM)的建议。给出了一些有代表性的例子来说明分析的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical analysis of accuracy in noise figure measurements
There is a growing trend to integrate noise figure measurement capabilities in microwave instruments originally devoted to other general purpose measurements as Vector Network Analyzers or Spectrum Analyzers. This opens up new possibilities to take into account vector corrections (at least in the case of VNA), or even to consider other techniques (such as cold-source) for computing the noise figure, different from the classical Y-factor approach used by most noise figure meters. In order to evaluate the suitability of these new options it is important to correctly analyze the benefits in terms of final accuracy that they can provide. However, errors in noise figure measurements have very different sources and nature, which sometimes do not allow straight forward conclusions on measurement accuracy. In this paper, a consistent evaluation of systematic errors and measurement uncertainty associated to different methodologies is presented. For that, the recommendations of the IEC-ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) are followed. Some representative examples are given to illustrate the interest of the analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信