计算思维教育的未来关系:综述的初步系统综述

Zerong Xie, Jeffrey Radloff, G. Wong, Ibrahim H. Yeter
{"title":"计算思维教育的未来关系:综述的初步系统综述","authors":"Zerong Xie, Jeffrey Radloff, G. Wong, Ibrahim H. Yeter","doi":"10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have seen a high volume of computational thinking (CT) review studies. However, there have been no existing studies that map these reviews with the goal of achieving comprehensive understanding of the field of CT. This paper utilizes Tikva & Tambouris’ (2021) K-12 CT research domain conceptual model as the basis for identifying and defining CT reviews, then maps the identified 38 CT reviews onto the identified domains. We pinpoint eight potential future review topics, including \"communities\" of tools, \"modeling simulations,\" \"problem-solving\" and \"scaffolding\" of learning strategies, \"demographic attributes\" of factors, \"practices\" and \"perspectives\" of the knowledge-based areas, and the \"teacher training\" of capacity building. We also examine the topical keywords of the reviews and identify that the scope of the term \"unplugged\" is vaguely defined among the existing research, suggesting a need to refine the definition of this frequently discussed topic so as to be able to more effectively conduct supplementary reviews. Our results help to better understand the CT review field and formulate future directions.","PeriodicalId":369501,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future Nexus of Computational Thinking Education: A Preliminary Systematic Review of Reviews\",\"authors\":\"Zerong Xie, Jeffrey Radloff, G. Wong, Ibrahim H. Yeter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent years have seen a high volume of computational thinking (CT) review studies. However, there have been no existing studies that map these reviews with the goal of achieving comprehensive understanding of the field of CT. This paper utilizes Tikva & Tambouris’ (2021) K-12 CT research domain conceptual model as the basis for identifying and defining CT reviews, then maps the identified 38 CT reviews onto the identified domains. We pinpoint eight potential future review topics, including \\\"communities\\\" of tools, \\\"modeling simulations,\\\" \\\"problem-solving\\\" and \\\"scaffolding\\\" of learning strategies, \\\"demographic attributes\\\" of factors, \\\"practices\\\" and \\\"perspectives\\\" of the knowledge-based areas, and the \\\"teacher training\\\" of capacity building. We also examine the topical keywords of the reviews and identify that the scope of the term \\\"unplugged\\\" is vaguely defined among the existing research, suggesting a need to refine the definition of this frequently discussed topic so as to be able to more effectively conduct supplementary reviews. Our results help to better understand the CT review field and formulate future directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来出现了大量的计算思维(CT)综述研究。然而,目前还没有研究将这些综述与全面了解CT领域的目标联系起来。本文利用Tikva & Tambouris (2021) K-12 CT研究领域概念模型作为识别和定义CT评论的基础,然后将识别的38个CT评论映射到识别的领域。我们指出了八个潜在的未来审查主题,包括工具的“社区”,“建模模拟”,学习策略的“解决问题”和“脚手架”,因素的“人口统计属性”,基于知识的领域的“实践”和“观点”,以及能力建设的“教师培训”。我们还检查了综述的主题关键词,发现在现有的研究中,“不插电”一词的范围定义模糊,这表明需要完善这一频繁讨论的主题的定义,以便能够更有效地进行补充综述。我们的研究结果有助于更好地理解CT复习领域和制定未来的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Future Nexus of Computational Thinking Education: A Preliminary Systematic Review of Reviews
Recent years have seen a high volume of computational thinking (CT) review studies. However, there have been no existing studies that map these reviews with the goal of achieving comprehensive understanding of the field of CT. This paper utilizes Tikva & Tambouris’ (2021) K-12 CT research domain conceptual model as the basis for identifying and defining CT reviews, then maps the identified 38 CT reviews onto the identified domains. We pinpoint eight potential future review topics, including "communities" of tools, "modeling simulations," "problem-solving" and "scaffolding" of learning strategies, "demographic attributes" of factors, "practices" and "perspectives" of the knowledge-based areas, and the "teacher training" of capacity building. We also examine the topical keywords of the reviews and identify that the scope of the term "unplugged" is vaguely defined among the existing research, suggesting a need to refine the definition of this frequently discussed topic so as to be able to more effectively conduct supplementary reviews. Our results help to better understand the CT review field and formulate future directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信