单事件瞬态存在下逻辑门的敏感性分析方法

R. Schvittz, P. Butzen, L. Rosa
{"title":"单事件瞬态存在下逻辑门的敏感性分析方法","authors":"R. Schvittz, P. Butzen, L. Rosa","doi":"10.1109/ITC44778.2020.9325252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New design methodologies are needed to improve the circuit robustness to deal with technology scaling issues. Traditional fault-tolerant approaches present severe overheads. Alternative solutions based on partial fault tolerance and fault avoidance are considered a possible solution to the reliability problem. An accurate evaluation of circuit reliability is fundamental to allow a reliability-aware automated design flow, where the synthesis tool could rapidly cycle through several circuit configurations to assess the best option. Most of the circuit reliability estimation methods use logic gate information as the starting point. The difference in logic gates reliability is neglected. This work proposes models capable of analyzing logic gates susceptibility in different abstraction levels. Three methods are proposed based on transistor arrangement, stick diagram, and layout of the logic gates. A 45nm standard cell library is used to validate the proposed methods. The achieved results are used to analyze ISCAS’85 benchmark circuit reliability. The obtained Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) shows a considerable reduction of almost 50% compared to the values from traditional fixed logic gate reliability.","PeriodicalId":251504,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for Susceptibility Analysis of Logic Gates in the Presence of Single Event Transients\",\"authors\":\"R. Schvittz, P. Butzen, L. Rosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITC44778.2020.9325252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New design methodologies are needed to improve the circuit robustness to deal with technology scaling issues. Traditional fault-tolerant approaches present severe overheads. Alternative solutions based on partial fault tolerance and fault avoidance are considered a possible solution to the reliability problem. An accurate evaluation of circuit reliability is fundamental to allow a reliability-aware automated design flow, where the synthesis tool could rapidly cycle through several circuit configurations to assess the best option. Most of the circuit reliability estimation methods use logic gate information as the starting point. The difference in logic gates reliability is neglected. This work proposes models capable of analyzing logic gates susceptibility in different abstraction levels. Three methods are proposed based on transistor arrangement, stick diagram, and layout of the logic gates. A 45nm standard cell library is used to validate the proposed methods. The achieved results are used to analyze ISCAS’85 benchmark circuit reliability. The obtained Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) shows a considerable reduction of almost 50% compared to the values from traditional fixed logic gate reliability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITC44778.2020.9325252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITC44778.2020.9325252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

需要新的设计方法来提高电路的鲁棒性,以应对技术缩放问题。传统的容错方法带来了严重的开销。基于部分容错和故障避免的备选方案被认为是解决可靠性问题的一种可能方案。电路可靠性的准确评估是实现可靠性感知自动化设计流程的基础,其中合成工具可以快速循环多个电路配置以评估最佳选择。大多数电路可靠性估计方法都是以逻辑门信息作为起点的。忽略逻辑门可靠性的差异。这项工作提出了能够在不同抽象层次上分析逻辑门易感性的模型。提出了三种基于晶体管排列、简图和逻辑门布局的方法。使用45nm标准细胞库验证了所提出的方法。将所得结果用于ISCAS’85基准电路可靠性分析。得到的平均故障间隔时间(MTBF)与传统的固定逻辑门可靠性值相比,减少了近50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methods for Susceptibility Analysis of Logic Gates in the Presence of Single Event Transients
New design methodologies are needed to improve the circuit robustness to deal with technology scaling issues. Traditional fault-tolerant approaches present severe overheads. Alternative solutions based on partial fault tolerance and fault avoidance are considered a possible solution to the reliability problem. An accurate evaluation of circuit reliability is fundamental to allow a reliability-aware automated design flow, where the synthesis tool could rapidly cycle through several circuit configurations to assess the best option. Most of the circuit reliability estimation methods use logic gate information as the starting point. The difference in logic gates reliability is neglected. This work proposes models capable of analyzing logic gates susceptibility in different abstraction levels. Three methods are proposed based on transistor arrangement, stick diagram, and layout of the logic gates. A 45nm standard cell library is used to validate the proposed methods. The achieved results are used to analyze ISCAS’85 benchmark circuit reliability. The obtained Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) shows a considerable reduction of almost 50% compared to the values from traditional fixed logic gate reliability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信