小型电子机箱中气流预测方法的评价

Rebecca Biswas, Raghu, Agarwal, Avijit Goswami
{"title":"小型电子机箱中气流预测方法的评价","authors":"Rebecca Biswas, Raghu, Agarwal, Avijit Goswami","doi":"10.1109/STHERM.1999.762428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In forced convection cooled electronic enclosure design, one of the most important parameters is enclosure airflow. Enclosure airflow mainly depends upon enclosure pressure drop and fan characteristics. Fan curves are often used in conjunction with system pressure drop (impedance) characteristics to determine airflow. CFD tool accuracy depends mainly on accurate modeling of system pressure loss (grilles, filters, etc.) and fan curve data accuracy. The fan curves, which show fan air delivery capacity at various pressure drops, are usually generated with no obstructions close to the fan. However, electronic systems contain densely packaged components, including airflow obstructions such as inlet and outlet grilles in close proximity to the fan, so methods using fan curves can often be inaccurate for airflow prediction. Inaccuracies can also occur by using grille pressure loss data from handbooks. The objective of this study is to understand the accuracy of airflow prediction methods use pressure loss and fan curve data compared to experimental results obtained in a wind tunnel. The system used is representative of typical electronic systems, which include major components such as fans, inlet and outlet grilles and an array of stacked PCBs. Further components such as capacitors, inductors, transformers and heat sinks are also included to increase the total pressure drop. Base configuration variations are made by changing grille open area, fan size and using fans in series and parallel configurations. It is found that differences of up to 20% can occur depending on the method used to calculate flow.","PeriodicalId":253023,"journal":{"name":"Fifteenth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36306)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of airflow prediction methods in compact electronic enclosures\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Biswas, Raghu, Agarwal, Avijit Goswami\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STHERM.1999.762428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In forced convection cooled electronic enclosure design, one of the most important parameters is enclosure airflow. Enclosure airflow mainly depends upon enclosure pressure drop and fan characteristics. Fan curves are often used in conjunction with system pressure drop (impedance) characteristics to determine airflow. CFD tool accuracy depends mainly on accurate modeling of system pressure loss (grilles, filters, etc.) and fan curve data accuracy. The fan curves, which show fan air delivery capacity at various pressure drops, are usually generated with no obstructions close to the fan. However, electronic systems contain densely packaged components, including airflow obstructions such as inlet and outlet grilles in close proximity to the fan, so methods using fan curves can often be inaccurate for airflow prediction. Inaccuracies can also occur by using grille pressure loss data from handbooks. The objective of this study is to understand the accuracy of airflow prediction methods use pressure loss and fan curve data compared to experimental results obtained in a wind tunnel. The system used is representative of typical electronic systems, which include major components such as fans, inlet and outlet grilles and an array of stacked PCBs. Further components such as capacitors, inductors, transformers and heat sinks are also included to increase the total pressure drop. Base configuration variations are made by changing grille open area, fan size and using fans in series and parallel configurations. It is found that differences of up to 20% can occur depending on the method used to calculate flow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifteenth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36306)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifteenth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36306)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STHERM.1999.762428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifteenth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36306)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STHERM.1999.762428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

在强制对流冷却电子机壳设计中,机壳气流是最重要的参数之一。机壳气流主要取决于机壳压降和风机特性。风机曲线通常与系统压降(阻抗)特性结合使用,以确定气流。CFD工具的精度主要取决于系统压力损失(格栅、过滤器等)的准确建模和风机曲线数据的精度。风机曲线显示了风机在各种压降下的风量,通常是在风机附近没有障碍物的情况下生成的。然而,电子系统包含密集封装的组件,包括气流障碍物,例如靠近风扇的进风口和出风口格栅,因此使用风扇曲线的方法通常无法准确预测气流。使用手册中的格栅压力损失数据也可能出现不准确性。本研究的目的是了解使用压力损失和风机曲线数据的气流预测方法与在风洞中获得的实验结果的准确性。所使用的系统是典型电子系统的代表,其中包括风扇,进风口和出风口格栅以及堆叠pcb阵列等主要组件。进一步的组件,如电容器,电感器,变压器和散热器也包括增加总压降。基本配置的变化是通过改变格栅开放面积,风扇尺寸和使用风扇串联和并联配置。结果发现,根据计算流量的方法不同,差异可达20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of airflow prediction methods in compact electronic enclosures
In forced convection cooled electronic enclosure design, one of the most important parameters is enclosure airflow. Enclosure airflow mainly depends upon enclosure pressure drop and fan characteristics. Fan curves are often used in conjunction with system pressure drop (impedance) characteristics to determine airflow. CFD tool accuracy depends mainly on accurate modeling of system pressure loss (grilles, filters, etc.) and fan curve data accuracy. The fan curves, which show fan air delivery capacity at various pressure drops, are usually generated with no obstructions close to the fan. However, electronic systems contain densely packaged components, including airflow obstructions such as inlet and outlet grilles in close proximity to the fan, so methods using fan curves can often be inaccurate for airflow prediction. Inaccuracies can also occur by using grille pressure loss data from handbooks. The objective of this study is to understand the accuracy of airflow prediction methods use pressure loss and fan curve data compared to experimental results obtained in a wind tunnel. The system used is representative of typical electronic systems, which include major components such as fans, inlet and outlet grilles and an array of stacked PCBs. Further components such as capacitors, inductors, transformers and heat sinks are also included to increase the total pressure drop. Base configuration variations are made by changing grille open area, fan size and using fans in series and parallel configurations. It is found that differences of up to 20% can occur depending on the method used to calculate flow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信