特征分析寄存器中的混叠实验

D. Xavier, R. Aitken, A. Ivanov, V. Agarwal
{"title":"特征分析寄存器中的混叠实验","authors":"D. Xavier, R. Aitken, A. Ivanov, V. Agarwal","doi":"10.1109/TEST.1989.82318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An effort is made to validate experimentally predictions on aliasing in signature analysis registers under the independent error model. From the experimental results it appears that the independent error model accurately predicts the probability of aliasing in signature registers. The authors also provide justification for the adoption of a more general asymmetric error model of which the former is a special case; the latter can be used at no extra cost. Among the potential benefits in using the asymmetric error model is the subdivision of faults into classes based on pD and pDbar, the conditional probability, respectively, of the fault-free bit being 1 and the faulty bit being 0 and vice versa, whereby faults in a given class have the same probability of aliasing. Under the independent error model fault classification is based on a single parameter p. Use of an asymmetric model hence provides a better resolution in terms of the classification of faults based on aliasing probability. Experimental results also indicate that considering the asymmetric nature of circuit outputs yields more useful information, especially in the dynamic region of the aliasing curve.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":264111,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 'Meeting the Tests of Time'., International Test Conference","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiments on aliasing in signature analysis registers\",\"authors\":\"D. Xavier, R. Aitken, A. Ivanov, V. Agarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEST.1989.82318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An effort is made to validate experimentally predictions on aliasing in signature analysis registers under the independent error model. From the experimental results it appears that the independent error model accurately predicts the probability of aliasing in signature registers. The authors also provide justification for the adoption of a more general asymmetric error model of which the former is a special case; the latter can be used at no extra cost. Among the potential benefits in using the asymmetric error model is the subdivision of faults into classes based on pD and pDbar, the conditional probability, respectively, of the fault-free bit being 1 and the faulty bit being 0 and vice versa, whereby faults in a given class have the same probability of aliasing. Under the independent error model fault classification is based on a single parameter p. Use of an asymmetric model hence provides a better resolution in terms of the classification of faults based on aliasing probability. Experimental results also indicate that considering the asymmetric nature of circuit outputs yields more useful information, especially in the dynamic region of the aliasing curve.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":264111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 'Meeting the Tests of Time'., International Test Conference\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 'Meeting the Tests of Time'., International Test Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEST.1989.82318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 'Meeting the Tests of Time'., International Test Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEST.1989.82318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

在独立误差模型下,对特征分析寄存器中混叠的实验预测进行了验证。实验结果表明,独立误差模型能够准确地预测签名寄存器中混叠的概率。作者还为采用更一般的非对称误差模型提供了理由,其中前者是一种特殊情况;后者无需额外费用即可使用。使用非对称错误模型的潜在好处之一是基于pD和pDbar将故障细分为类别,无故障位的条件概率分别为1和故障位的条件概率为0,反之亦然,即给定类别中的故障具有相同的混叠概率。在独立误差模型下,故障分类基于单个参数p,因此使用非对称模型在基于混叠概率的故障分类方面提供了更好的解决方案。实验结果还表明,考虑电路输出的不对称特性可以得到更多有用的信息,特别是在混叠曲线的动态区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiments on aliasing in signature analysis registers
An effort is made to validate experimentally predictions on aliasing in signature analysis registers under the independent error model. From the experimental results it appears that the independent error model accurately predicts the probability of aliasing in signature registers. The authors also provide justification for the adoption of a more general asymmetric error model of which the former is a special case; the latter can be used at no extra cost. Among the potential benefits in using the asymmetric error model is the subdivision of faults into classes based on pD and pDbar, the conditional probability, respectively, of the fault-free bit being 1 and the faulty bit being 0 and vice versa, whereby faults in a given class have the same probability of aliasing. Under the independent error model fault classification is based on a single parameter p. Use of an asymmetric model hence provides a better resolution in terms of the classification of faults based on aliasing probability. Experimental results also indicate that considering the asymmetric nature of circuit outputs yields more useful information, especially in the dynamic region of the aliasing curve.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信