精神障碍作为排除刑事责任的基础:比较法方法

Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg
{"title":"精神障碍作为排除刑事责任的基础:比较法方法","authors":"Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg","doi":"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p243-264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of mental disorders on criminal responsibility seems to be more or less the same in all jurisdictions. However, upon a closer look, the details of the regulatory schemes and the practical effects vary considerably and this discord has increased even more in the past 30 years. This article undertakes a brief comparative survey with a focus on substantive criminal law in order to sketch a normative matrix which shows that there are three basic approaches to deal with mental disorders as grounds for excluding criminal responsibility. While psychiatry has made considerable progress over the past 150 years, in providing more humane treatment to mentally ill persons, it is a disturbing observation that the criminal law appears to be significantly less tolerant towards mentally disturbed offenders in modern times than during the previous two millennia.","PeriodicalId":159774,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distúrbios mentais como fundamento para a exclusão da responsabilidade penal: uma abordagem de direito comparado\",\"authors\":\"Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p243-264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effect of mental disorders on criminal responsibility seems to be more or less the same in all jurisdictions. However, upon a closer look, the details of the regulatory schemes and the practical effects vary considerably and this discord has increased even more in the past 30 years. This article undertakes a brief comparative survey with a focus on substantive criminal law in order to sketch a normative matrix which shows that there are three basic approaches to deal with mental disorders as grounds for excluding criminal responsibility. While psychiatry has made considerable progress over the past 150 years, in providing more humane treatment to mentally ill persons, it is a disturbing observation that the criminal law appears to be significantly less tolerant towards mentally disturbed offenders in modern times than during the previous two millennia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p243-264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p243-264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神障碍对刑事责任的影响在所有司法管辖区似乎或多或少是相同的。然而,仔细一看,监管计划的细节和实际效果差别很大,这种不和谐在过去30年里更加严重。本文对实体刑法进行了简要的比较调查,以勾勒出一个规范矩阵,表明有三种基本方法来处理精神障碍作为排除刑事责任的理由。虽然精神病学在过去150年里取得了相当大的进步,为精神病患者提供了更加人道的治疗,但令人不安的是,现代刑法对精神失常罪犯的容忍度似乎明显低于前两千年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distúrbios mentais como fundamento para a exclusão da responsabilidade penal: uma abordagem de direito comparado
The effect of mental disorders on criminal responsibility seems to be more or less the same in all jurisdictions. However, upon a closer look, the details of the regulatory schemes and the practical effects vary considerably and this discord has increased even more in the past 30 years. This article undertakes a brief comparative survey with a focus on substantive criminal law in order to sketch a normative matrix which shows that there are three basic approaches to deal with mental disorders as grounds for excluding criminal responsibility. While psychiatry has made considerable progress over the past 150 years, in providing more humane treatment to mentally ill persons, it is a disturbing observation that the criminal law appears to be significantly less tolerant towards mentally disturbed offenders in modern times than during the previous two millennia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信