WeSPer:一个灵活的小延迟缺陷质量度量

Omar Al-Terkawi Hasib, Y. Savaria, C. Thibeault
{"title":"WeSPer:一个灵活的小延迟缺陷质量度量","authors":"Omar Al-Terkawi Hasib, Y. Savaria, C. Thibeault","doi":"10.1109/VTS.2016.7477266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testing for small delay defects (SDDs) is important due to their dominance in recent technology nodes. Unfortunately, all the SDD test quality metrics in the literature limit their assessment to the size of the delay defect tested under at-speed or slower clocks, which makes their results misleading under special cases such as faster-than-at-speed testing. Moreover, those metrics are inadequate for assessing the quality of recent SDD test methods that consider the variation of delays in a circuit. In this paper, a novel flexible SDD quality metric that can be adapted according to the available information and the applied test method is proposed. The proposed metric is named Weighted Slack Percentage (WeSPer) as it is defined by a slack ratio weighted by confidence level (CL) multipliers. The flexibility comes from the ability to model test inaccuracies or delay varying effects into the CL multipliers. This paper presents the WeSPer metric, along with a CL multiplier that penalizes overtesting to give a more accurate assessment of the quality of faster-than-at-speed testing. The metric is calculated for several benchmark circuits and compared to other SDD metrics found in the literature. The results show that WeSPer is better than other metrics at representing the quality of SDD tests, especially under faster-than-at-speed testing.","PeriodicalId":124707,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 34th VLSI Test Symposium (VTS)","volume":"272 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WeSPer: A flexible small delay defect quality metric\",\"authors\":\"Omar Al-Terkawi Hasib, Y. Savaria, C. Thibeault\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VTS.2016.7477266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Testing for small delay defects (SDDs) is important due to their dominance in recent technology nodes. Unfortunately, all the SDD test quality metrics in the literature limit their assessment to the size of the delay defect tested under at-speed or slower clocks, which makes their results misleading under special cases such as faster-than-at-speed testing. Moreover, those metrics are inadequate for assessing the quality of recent SDD test methods that consider the variation of delays in a circuit. In this paper, a novel flexible SDD quality metric that can be adapted according to the available information and the applied test method is proposed. The proposed metric is named Weighted Slack Percentage (WeSPer) as it is defined by a slack ratio weighted by confidence level (CL) multipliers. The flexibility comes from the ability to model test inaccuracies or delay varying effects into the CL multipliers. This paper presents the WeSPer metric, along with a CL multiplier that penalizes overtesting to give a more accurate assessment of the quality of faster-than-at-speed testing. The metric is calculated for several benchmark circuits and compared to other SDD metrics found in the literature. The results show that WeSPer is better than other metrics at representing the quality of SDD tests, especially under faster-than-at-speed testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 34th VLSI Test Symposium (VTS)\",\"volume\":\"272 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 34th VLSI Test Symposium (VTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VTS.2016.7477266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 34th VLSI Test Symposium (VTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VTS.2016.7477266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

小延迟缺陷(sdd)的测试非常重要,因为它们在最近的技术节点中占主导地位。不幸的是,文献中所有的SDD测试质量度量都将它们的评估限制在高速或慢速时钟下测试的延迟缺陷的大小,这使得它们的结果在特殊情况下具有误导性,例如比高速测试更快。此外,那些度量对于评估考虑电路中延迟变化的最近的SDD测试方法的质量是不够的。本文提出了一种新的灵活的SDD质量度量,该度量可以根据可用信息和应用的测试方法进行调整。该指标被命名为加权松弛率(WeSPer),因为它是由松弛率由置信度(CL)乘数加权定义的。这种灵活性来自于对测试不准确性进行建模或将变化的影响延迟到CL乘数中的能力。本文介绍了WeSPer度量,以及一个CL乘数,该乘数可以惩罚过度测试,从而对快速测试的质量给出更准确的评估。该指标是为几个基准电路计算的,并与文献中发现的其他SDD指标进行比较。结果表明,WeSPer在表示SDD测试的质量方面比其他指标更好,特别是在比速度更快的测试中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WeSPer: A flexible small delay defect quality metric
Testing for small delay defects (SDDs) is important due to their dominance in recent technology nodes. Unfortunately, all the SDD test quality metrics in the literature limit their assessment to the size of the delay defect tested under at-speed or slower clocks, which makes their results misleading under special cases such as faster-than-at-speed testing. Moreover, those metrics are inadequate for assessing the quality of recent SDD test methods that consider the variation of delays in a circuit. In this paper, a novel flexible SDD quality metric that can be adapted according to the available information and the applied test method is proposed. The proposed metric is named Weighted Slack Percentage (WeSPer) as it is defined by a slack ratio weighted by confidence level (CL) multipliers. The flexibility comes from the ability to model test inaccuracies or delay varying effects into the CL multipliers. This paper presents the WeSPer metric, along with a CL multiplier that penalizes overtesting to give a more accurate assessment of the quality of faster-than-at-speed testing. The metric is calculated for several benchmark circuits and compared to other SDD metrics found in the literature. The results show that WeSPer is better than other metrics at representing the quality of SDD tests, especially under faster-than-at-speed testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信