儿童运动员脑震荡前庭/眼球运动筛查的长期重复测试可靠性:初步研究。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Applied Neuropsychology: Child Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21622965.2022.2163172
Ryan N Moran, Abigail C Bretzin
{"title":"儿童运动员脑震荡前庭/眼球运动筛查的长期重复测试可靠性:初步研究。","authors":"Ryan N Moran, Abigail C Bretzin","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2022.2163172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) is a sport-related concussion screening tool that assesses vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) and oculomotor symptom provocation. Long-term test-retest reliability of the VOMS over multiple athletic seasons has not yet been established in a pediatric population. Fifty-one child athletes (females = 28, 54.9%) 8-13 years of age, completed a baseline VOMS assessment at two timepoints, 18 months apart. Cronbach's alpha was used to examine the internal consistency at both time points. Two-way mixed intra-class correlation coefficients and Cohen's Kappa statistics were used to evaluate test-retest reliability. High internal consistency existed at both initial (<i>α</i> = 0.91) and follow-up (<i>α</i> = 0.95) for VOMS symptom provocation items. Strong inter-item correlations were noted between vertical VOR (<i>r</i> = ≥0.70) and visual motion sensitivity (VMS) (<i>r</i> = ≥0.70). Fair agreement was produced for convergence (<i>κ</i> = 0.23, vertical VOR (<i>κ</i> = 0.25) and VMS (<i>κ</i> = 0.25), as well as reliability on NPC distance (ICC<sub>2,</sub><i><sub>k</sub></i> = 0.31). All other VOMS scores yielded poor agreement between time points. Symptom provocation was the same for 49% of athletes between timepoints, while 31.4% had a decrease in scoring at follow-up. Symptom provocation from VOMS tasks lessened with increasing age and time; therefore, clinicians should consider annual baseline testing to improve accuracy for concussion evaluation and management in pediatrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"300-305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term test-retest reliability of the vestibular/ocular motor screening for concussion in child athletes: A preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan N Moran, Abigail C Bretzin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21622965.2022.2163172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) is a sport-related concussion screening tool that assesses vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) and oculomotor symptom provocation. Long-term test-retest reliability of the VOMS over multiple athletic seasons has not yet been established in a pediatric population. Fifty-one child athletes (females = 28, 54.9%) 8-13 years of age, completed a baseline VOMS assessment at two timepoints, 18 months apart. Cronbach's alpha was used to examine the internal consistency at both time points. Two-way mixed intra-class correlation coefficients and Cohen's Kappa statistics were used to evaluate test-retest reliability. High internal consistency existed at both initial (<i>α</i> = 0.91) and follow-up (<i>α</i> = 0.95) for VOMS symptom provocation items. Strong inter-item correlations were noted between vertical VOR (<i>r</i> = ≥0.70) and visual motion sensitivity (VMS) (<i>r</i> = ≥0.70). Fair agreement was produced for convergence (<i>κ</i> = 0.23, vertical VOR (<i>κ</i> = 0.25) and VMS (<i>κ</i> = 0.25), as well as reliability on NPC distance (ICC<sub>2,</sub><i><sub>k</sub></i> = 0.31). All other VOMS scores yielded poor agreement between time points. Symptom provocation was the same for 49% of athletes between timepoints, while 31.4% had a decrease in scoring at follow-up. Symptom provocation from VOMS tasks lessened with increasing age and time; therefore, clinicians should consider annual baseline testing to improve accuracy for concussion evaluation and management in pediatrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"300-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2022.2163172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2022.2163172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前庭/眼球运动筛查(VOMS)是一种与运动相关的脑震荡筛查工具,用于评估前庭眼球反射(VOR)和眼球运动症状激发。在儿科人群中,VOMS 在多个运动赛季中的长期测试可靠性尚未得到证实。51 名 8-13 岁的儿童运动员(女性 28 名,占 54.9%)在两个时间点完成了 VOMS 基线评估,两个时间点相隔 18 个月。采用克朗巴赫α检验两个时间点的内部一致性。双向混合类内相关系数和 Cohen's Kappa 统计用于评估测试-再测可靠性。VOMS 症状诱发项目的初始(α = 0.91)和随访(α = 0.95)内部一致性都很高。垂直 VOR(r = ≥0.70)和视觉运动敏感性(VMS)(r = ≥0.70)之间存在较强的项目间相关性。在辐辏(κ = 0.23)、垂直 VOR(κ = 0.25)和 VMS(κ = 0.25)以及 NPC 距离的可靠性(ICC2,k = 0.31)方面的一致性相当好。所有其他VOMS评分在不同时间点之间的一致性较差。49%的运动员在不同时间点的症状诱发情况相同,而31.4%的运动员在随访时得分有所下降。随着年龄和时间的增长,VOMS任务的症状激发程度也在降低;因此,临床医生应考虑每年进行一次基线测试,以提高儿科脑震荡评估和管理的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term test-retest reliability of the vestibular/ocular motor screening for concussion in child athletes: A preliminary study.

The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) is a sport-related concussion screening tool that assesses vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) and oculomotor symptom provocation. Long-term test-retest reliability of the VOMS over multiple athletic seasons has not yet been established in a pediatric population. Fifty-one child athletes (females = 28, 54.9%) 8-13 years of age, completed a baseline VOMS assessment at two timepoints, 18 months apart. Cronbach's alpha was used to examine the internal consistency at both time points. Two-way mixed intra-class correlation coefficients and Cohen's Kappa statistics were used to evaluate test-retest reliability. High internal consistency existed at both initial (α = 0.91) and follow-up (α = 0.95) for VOMS symptom provocation items. Strong inter-item correlations were noted between vertical VOR (r = ≥0.70) and visual motion sensitivity (VMS) (r = ≥0.70). Fair agreement was produced for convergence (κ = 0.23, vertical VOR (κ = 0.25) and VMS (κ = 0.25), as well as reliability on NPC distance (ICC2,k = 0.31). All other VOMS scores yielded poor agreement between time points. Symptom provocation was the same for 49% of athletes between timepoints, while 31.4% had a decrease in scoring at follow-up. Symptom provocation from VOMS tasks lessened with increasing age and time; therefore, clinicians should consider annual baseline testing to improve accuracy for concussion evaluation and management in pediatrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信