Malcolm F McDonald, Lyndsey L Prather, Cassandra R Helfer, Ethan B Ludmir, Alfredo E Echeverria, Shlomit Yust-Katz, Akash J Patel, Benjamin Deneen, Ganesh Rao, Ali Jalali, Shweta U Dhar, Chris I Amos, Jacob J Mandel
{"title":"成人型弥漫性胶质瘤中致病性种系变异的患病率。","authors":"Malcolm F McDonald, Lyndsey L Prather, Cassandra R Helfer, Ethan B Ludmir, Alfredo E Echeverria, Shlomit Yust-Katz, Akash J Patel, Benjamin Deneen, Ganesh Rao, Ali Jalali, Shweta U Dhar, Chris I Amos, Jacob J Mandel","doi":"10.1093/nop/npad033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No consensus germline testing guidelines currently exist for glioma patients, so the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants remains unknown. This study aims to determine the prevalence and type of pathogenic germline variants in adult glioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review at a single institution with paired tumor/normal sequencing from August 2018-April 2022 was performed and corresponding clinical data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 152 glioma patients of which 15 (9.8%) had pathogenic germline variants. Pathogenic germline variants were seen in 11/84 (13.1%) of Glioblastoma, <i>IDH</i> wild type; 3/42 (7.1%) of Astrocytoma, <i>IDH</i> mutant; and 1/26 (3.8%) of Oligodendroglioma, <i>IDH</i> mutant, and 1p/19q co-deleted patients. Pathogenic variants in <i>BRCA2</i>, <i>MUTYH,</i> and <i>CHEK2</i> were most common (3/15, 20% each). <i>BRCA1</i> variants occurred in 2/15 (13%) patients, with variants in <i>NF1</i>, <i>ATM</i>, <i>MSH2</i>, and <i>MSH3</i> occurring in one patient (7%) each. Prior cancer diagnosis was found in 5/15 patients (33%). Second-hit somatic variants were seen in 3/15 patients (20%) in <i>NF1</i>, <i>MUTYH,</i> and <i>MSH2</i>. Referral to genetics was performed in 6/15 (40%) patients with pathogenic germline variants. 14/15 (93%) of patients discovered their pathogenic variant as a result of their paired glioma sequencing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest a possible overlooked opportunity for determination of hereditary cancer syndromes with impact on surveillance as well as potential broader treatment options. Further studies that can determine the role of variants in gliomagenesis and confirm the occurrence and types of pathogenic germline variants in patients with <i>IDH</i> wild type compared to <i>IDH</i> mutant tumors are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in adult-type diffuse glioma.\",\"authors\":\"Malcolm F McDonald, Lyndsey L Prather, Cassandra R Helfer, Ethan B Ludmir, Alfredo E Echeverria, Shlomit Yust-Katz, Akash J Patel, Benjamin Deneen, Ganesh Rao, Ali Jalali, Shweta U Dhar, Chris I Amos, Jacob J Mandel\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nop/npad033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No consensus germline testing guidelines currently exist for glioma patients, so the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants remains unknown. This study aims to determine the prevalence and type of pathogenic germline variants in adult glioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review at a single institution with paired tumor/normal sequencing from August 2018-April 2022 was performed and corresponding clinical data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 152 glioma patients of which 15 (9.8%) had pathogenic germline variants. Pathogenic germline variants were seen in 11/84 (13.1%) of Glioblastoma, <i>IDH</i> wild type; 3/42 (7.1%) of Astrocytoma, <i>IDH</i> mutant; and 1/26 (3.8%) of Oligodendroglioma, <i>IDH</i> mutant, and 1p/19q co-deleted patients. Pathogenic variants in <i>BRCA2</i>, <i>MUTYH,</i> and <i>CHEK2</i> were most common (3/15, 20% each). <i>BRCA1</i> variants occurred in 2/15 (13%) patients, with variants in <i>NF1</i>, <i>ATM</i>, <i>MSH2</i>, and <i>MSH3</i> occurring in one patient (7%) each. Prior cancer diagnosis was found in 5/15 patients (33%). Second-hit somatic variants were seen in 3/15 patients (20%) in <i>NF1</i>, <i>MUTYH,</i> and <i>MSH2</i>. Referral to genetics was performed in 6/15 (40%) patients with pathogenic germline variants. 14/15 (93%) of patients discovered their pathogenic variant as a result of their paired glioma sequencing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest a possible overlooked opportunity for determination of hereditary cancer syndromes with impact on surveillance as well as potential broader treatment options. Further studies that can determine the role of variants in gliomagenesis and confirm the occurrence and types of pathogenic germline variants in patients with <i>IDH</i> wild type compared to <i>IDH</i> mutant tumors are necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502787/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in adult-type diffuse glioma.
Background: No consensus germline testing guidelines currently exist for glioma patients, so the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants remains unknown. This study aims to determine the prevalence and type of pathogenic germline variants in adult glioma.
Methods: A retrospective review at a single institution with paired tumor/normal sequencing from August 2018-April 2022 was performed and corresponding clinical data were collected.
Results: We identified 152 glioma patients of which 15 (9.8%) had pathogenic germline variants. Pathogenic germline variants were seen in 11/84 (13.1%) of Glioblastoma, IDH wild type; 3/42 (7.1%) of Astrocytoma, IDH mutant; and 1/26 (3.8%) of Oligodendroglioma, IDH mutant, and 1p/19q co-deleted patients. Pathogenic variants in BRCA2, MUTYH, and CHEK2 were most common (3/15, 20% each). BRCA1 variants occurred in 2/15 (13%) patients, with variants in NF1, ATM, MSH2, and MSH3 occurring in one patient (7%) each. Prior cancer diagnosis was found in 5/15 patients (33%). Second-hit somatic variants were seen in 3/15 patients (20%) in NF1, MUTYH, and MSH2. Referral to genetics was performed in 6/15 (40%) patients with pathogenic germline variants. 14/15 (93%) of patients discovered their pathogenic variant as a result of their paired glioma sequencing.
Conclusions: These findings suggest a possible overlooked opportunity for determination of hereditary cancer syndromes with impact on surveillance as well as potential broader treatment options. Further studies that can determine the role of variants in gliomagenesis and confirm the occurrence and types of pathogenic germline variants in patients with IDH wild type compared to IDH mutant tumors are necessary.
期刊介绍:
Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving