视觉工作记忆中回顾性线索诱导的内部选择的早期自上而下控制:外围线索优于中心线索的优势

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Sizhu Han , Huihui Zhou , Yonghong Tian , Yixuan Ku
{"title":"视觉工作记忆中回顾性线索诱导的内部选择的早期自上而下控制:外围线索优于中心线索的优势","authors":"Sizhu Han ,&nbsp;Huihui Zhou ,&nbsp;Yonghong Tian ,&nbsp;Yixuan Ku","doi":"10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Attention can be deployed among external sensory stimuli or internal working memory (WM) representations, and recent primate studies have revealed that these external and internal selections share a common neural basis in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). However, it remains to be elucidated how PFC implements these selections, especially in humans. The present study aimed to further investigate whether PFC responded differentially to the peripheral and central retrospective cues (retro-cues) that induced attention selection among WM representations. To achieve this, we combined magnetoencephalography<span> (MEG, Experiment 1) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS, Experiment 2) with an orientation-recall paradigm. Experiment 1 found that a peripheral retro-cue with 100% reliability had a greater benefit on WM performance than a central retro-cue, while this advantage of peripheral over central cues vanished when the cue reliability dropped to 50% (non-informative). MEG source analysis indicated that the 100% peripheral retro-cue elicited earlier (∼125 ms) PFC responses than the central retro-cue (∼275 ms). Meanwhile, </span></span>Granger causality<span> analysis showed that PFC had earlier (0–200 ms) top-down signals projecting to the superior parietal lobule<span> (SPL) and the lateral occipital cortex<span> (LOC) after the onset of peripheral retro-cues, while these top-down signals appeared later (300–500 ms) after the onset of central retro-cues. Importantly, PFC activity within this period of 300–500 ms correlated with the peripheral advantage in behavior. Moreover, Experiment 2 applied TMS at different time points to test the causal influence of brain activity on behavior and found that stimulating PFC at 100 ms abolished the behavioral benefit of the peripheral retro-cue, as well as its advantage over the central retro-cue. Taken together, our results suggested that the advantage of peripheral over central retro-cues in the mnemonic domain is realized through faster top-down control from PFC, which challenged traditional opinions that the top-down control of attention on WM required at least 300 ms to appear. The present study highlighted that in addition to the causal role of PFC in attention selection of WM representations, timing was critical as well and faster was better.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":20851,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neurobiology","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 102521"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early top-down control of internal selection induced by retrospective cues in visual working memory: advantage of peripheral over central cues\",\"authors\":\"Sizhu Han ,&nbsp;Huihui Zhou ,&nbsp;Yonghong Tian ,&nbsp;Yixuan Ku\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Attention can be deployed among external sensory stimuli or internal working memory (WM) representations, and recent primate studies have revealed that these external and internal selections share a common neural basis in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). However, it remains to be elucidated how PFC implements these selections, especially in humans. The present study aimed to further investigate whether PFC responded differentially to the peripheral and central retrospective cues (retro-cues) that induced attention selection among WM representations. To achieve this, we combined magnetoencephalography<span> (MEG, Experiment 1) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS, Experiment 2) with an orientation-recall paradigm. Experiment 1 found that a peripheral retro-cue with 100% reliability had a greater benefit on WM performance than a central retro-cue, while this advantage of peripheral over central cues vanished when the cue reliability dropped to 50% (non-informative). MEG source analysis indicated that the 100% peripheral retro-cue elicited earlier (∼125 ms) PFC responses than the central retro-cue (∼275 ms). Meanwhile, </span></span>Granger causality<span> analysis showed that PFC had earlier (0–200 ms) top-down signals projecting to the superior parietal lobule<span> (SPL) and the lateral occipital cortex<span> (LOC) after the onset of peripheral retro-cues, while these top-down signals appeared later (300–500 ms) after the onset of central retro-cues. Importantly, PFC activity within this period of 300–500 ms correlated with the peripheral advantage in behavior. Moreover, Experiment 2 applied TMS at different time points to test the causal influence of brain activity on behavior and found that stimulating PFC at 100 ms abolished the behavioral benefit of the peripheral retro-cue, as well as its advantage over the central retro-cue. Taken together, our results suggested that the advantage of peripheral over central retro-cues in the mnemonic domain is realized through faster top-down control from PFC, which challenged traditional opinions that the top-down control of attention on WM required at least 300 ms to appear. The present study highlighted that in addition to the causal role of PFC in attention selection of WM representations, timing was critical as well and faster was better.</span></span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"230 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301008223001223\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301008223001223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

注意力可以分布在外部感觉刺激或内部工作记忆(WM)表征中,最近的灵长类动物研究表明,这些外部和内部选择在前额叶皮层(PFC)有着共同的神经基础。然而,PFC是如何实现这些选择的,尤其是在人类中,还有待阐明。本研究旨在进一步研究PFC是否对在WM表征中诱导注意力选择的外围和中心回顾性线索(回溯线索)有不同的反应。为了实现这一点,我们将脑磁图(MEG,实验1)和经颅磁刺激(TMS,实验2)与定向回忆范式相结合。实验1发现,与中心回溯线索相比,具有100%可靠性的外围回溯线索对WM表现的益处更大,而当线索可靠性降至50%(非信息性)时,外围线索优于中心线索的这种优势消失了。MEG来源分析表明,100%外周后向线索比中心后向线索(~275ms)更早(~125ms)引发PFC反应。同时,Granger因果关系分析显示,PFC在外周后向线索出现后,有更早(0–200 ms)的自上而下信号投射到顶叶上小叶(SPL)和枕外侧皮层(LOC),而这些自上而下信号在中心后向线索发现后出现较晚(300–500 ms)。重要的是,在300–500毫秒的时间段内,PFC活动与行为的外围优势相关。此外,实验2在不同的时间点应用TMS来测试大脑活动对行为的因果影响,发现在100ms刺激PFC消除了外围回溯线索的行为益处,以及它相对于中心回溯线索的优势。总之,我们的结果表明,记忆域中外围回溯线索相对于中心回溯线索的优势是通过PFC更快的自上而下控制实现的,这挑战了传统观点,即WM上注意力的自上而下控制至少需要300ms才能出现。本研究强调,除了PFC在WM表征的注意力选择中的因果作用外,时间也很关键,越快越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early top-down control of internal selection induced by retrospective cues in visual working memory: advantage of peripheral over central cues

Attention can be deployed among external sensory stimuli or internal working memory (WM) representations, and recent primate studies have revealed that these external and internal selections share a common neural basis in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). However, it remains to be elucidated how PFC implements these selections, especially in humans. The present study aimed to further investigate whether PFC responded differentially to the peripheral and central retrospective cues (retro-cues) that induced attention selection among WM representations. To achieve this, we combined magnetoencephalography (MEG, Experiment 1) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS, Experiment 2) with an orientation-recall paradigm. Experiment 1 found that a peripheral retro-cue with 100% reliability had a greater benefit on WM performance than a central retro-cue, while this advantage of peripheral over central cues vanished when the cue reliability dropped to 50% (non-informative). MEG source analysis indicated that the 100% peripheral retro-cue elicited earlier (∼125 ms) PFC responses than the central retro-cue (∼275 ms). Meanwhile, Granger causality analysis showed that PFC had earlier (0–200 ms) top-down signals projecting to the superior parietal lobule (SPL) and the lateral occipital cortex (LOC) after the onset of peripheral retro-cues, while these top-down signals appeared later (300–500 ms) after the onset of central retro-cues. Importantly, PFC activity within this period of 300–500 ms correlated with the peripheral advantage in behavior. Moreover, Experiment 2 applied TMS at different time points to test the causal influence of brain activity on behavior and found that stimulating PFC at 100 ms abolished the behavioral benefit of the peripheral retro-cue, as well as its advantage over the central retro-cue. Taken together, our results suggested that the advantage of peripheral over central retro-cues in the mnemonic domain is realized through faster top-down control from PFC, which challenged traditional opinions that the top-down control of attention on WM required at least 300 ms to appear. The present study highlighted that in addition to the causal role of PFC in attention selection of WM representations, timing was critical as well and faster was better.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Neurobiology
Progress in Neurobiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
107
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Neurobiology is an international journal that publishes groundbreaking original research, comprehensive review articles and opinion pieces written by leading researchers. The journal welcomes contributions from the broad field of neuroscience that apply neurophysiological, biochemical, pharmacological, molecular biological, anatomical, computational and behavioral analyses to problems of molecular, cellular, developmental, systems, and clinical neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信