筛查土著人民的抑郁和焦虑:一项全球范围审查。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Kathryn Meldrum, Ellaina Andersson, Torres Webb, Rachel Quigley, Edward Strivens, Sarah Russell
{"title":"筛查土著人民的抑郁和焦虑:一项全球范围审查。","authors":"Kathryn Meldrum,&nbsp;Ellaina Andersson,&nbsp;Torres Webb,&nbsp;Rachel Quigley,&nbsp;Edward Strivens,&nbsp;Sarah Russell","doi":"10.1177/13634615231187257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Indigenous peoples' worldviews are intricately interconnected and interrelated with their communities and the environments in which they live. Their worldviews also manifest in a holistic view of health and well-being, which contrasts with those of the dominant western biomedical model. However, screening depression and/or anxiety in Indigenous peoples often occurs using standard western tools. Understandably, the cultural appropriateness of these tools has been questioned. The purpose of this scoping review was to map the literature that used any type of tool to screen depression or anxiety in Indigenous adults globally. A systematic scoping review method was used to search databases including, but not limited to, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Google. Database-specific search terms associated with Indigenous peoples, depression and anxiety, and screening tools were used to identify literature. In addition, citation searches of related systematic reviews and relevant websites were conducted. The data set was limited to English language publications since database inception. Fifty-four publications met the review's inclusion criteria. Most studies were completed in community settings using standard western depression and anxiety screening tools. Thirty-three different tools were identified, with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 being the most frequently used. The review's findings are concerning given repeated calls for culturally appropriate screening tools to be used with Indigenous peoples. Although there has been some work to cross-culturally adapt depression screening tools for specific Indigenous populations, clearly more clinicians and researchers need to be aware of, and use, culturally appropriate approaches to screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":47864,"journal":{"name":"Transcultural Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening depression and anxiety in Indigenous peoples: A global scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Meldrum,&nbsp;Ellaina Andersson,&nbsp;Torres Webb,&nbsp;Rachel Quigley,&nbsp;Edward Strivens,&nbsp;Sarah Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13634615231187257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Indigenous peoples' worldviews are intricately interconnected and interrelated with their communities and the environments in which they live. Their worldviews also manifest in a holistic view of health and well-being, which contrasts with those of the dominant western biomedical model. However, screening depression and/or anxiety in Indigenous peoples often occurs using standard western tools. Understandably, the cultural appropriateness of these tools has been questioned. The purpose of this scoping review was to map the literature that used any type of tool to screen depression or anxiety in Indigenous adults globally. A systematic scoping review method was used to search databases including, but not limited to, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Google. Database-specific search terms associated with Indigenous peoples, depression and anxiety, and screening tools were used to identify literature. In addition, citation searches of related systematic reviews and relevant websites were conducted. The data set was limited to English language publications since database inception. Fifty-four publications met the review's inclusion criteria. Most studies were completed in community settings using standard western depression and anxiety screening tools. Thirty-three different tools were identified, with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 being the most frequently used. The review's findings are concerning given repeated calls for culturally appropriate screening tools to be used with Indigenous peoples. Although there has been some work to cross-culturally adapt depression screening tools for specific Indigenous populations, clearly more clinicians and researchers need to be aware of, and use, culturally appropriate approaches to screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transcultural Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transcultural Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615231187257\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcultural Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615231187257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

土著人民的世界观与他们的社区和生活环境有着错综复杂的相互联系和相互关联。他们的世界观还体现在对健康和福祉的整体看法上,这与占主导地位的西方生物医学模式形成鲜明对比。然而,土著人民的抑郁症和/或焦虑症筛查通常使用标准的西方工具。可以理解的是,这些工具的文化适宜性受到了质疑。本综述的目的是绘制全球土著成年人使用任何类型的工具筛选抑郁或焦虑的文献图谱。采用系统的范围评价方法对包括但不限于CINAHL、PubMed、Scopus和Google等数据库进行检索。使用与土著人民、抑郁和焦虑相关的数据库特定搜索词和筛选工具来识别文献。此外,对相关系统综述和相关网站进行了引文检索。自数据库建立以来,该数据集仅限于英文出版物。54篇出版物符合该综述的纳入标准。大多数研究是在社区环境中使用标准的西方抑郁和焦虑筛查工具完成的。确定了33种不同的工具,其中患者健康问卷-9是最常用的。鉴于人们一再呼吁在土著人民中使用文化上合适的筛查工具,该审查的结果令人担忧。虽然已经有一些工作是跨文化适应特定土著人群的抑郁症筛查工具,但显然更多的临床医生和研究人员需要意识到并使用文化上合适的筛查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening depression and anxiety in Indigenous peoples: A global scoping review.

Indigenous peoples' worldviews are intricately interconnected and interrelated with their communities and the environments in which they live. Their worldviews also manifest in a holistic view of health and well-being, which contrasts with those of the dominant western biomedical model. However, screening depression and/or anxiety in Indigenous peoples often occurs using standard western tools. Understandably, the cultural appropriateness of these tools has been questioned. The purpose of this scoping review was to map the literature that used any type of tool to screen depression or anxiety in Indigenous adults globally. A systematic scoping review method was used to search databases including, but not limited to, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Google. Database-specific search terms associated with Indigenous peoples, depression and anxiety, and screening tools were used to identify literature. In addition, citation searches of related systematic reviews and relevant websites were conducted. The data set was limited to English language publications since database inception. Fifty-four publications met the review's inclusion criteria. Most studies were completed in community settings using standard western depression and anxiety screening tools. Thirty-three different tools were identified, with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 being the most frequently used. The review's findings are concerning given repeated calls for culturally appropriate screening tools to be used with Indigenous peoples. Although there has been some work to cross-culturally adapt depression screening tools for specific Indigenous populations, clearly more clinicians and researchers need to be aware of, and use, culturally appropriate approaches to screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Transcultural Psychiatry is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on cultural psychiatry and mental health. Cultural psychiatry is concerned with the social and cultural determinants of psychopathology and psychosocial treatments of the range of mental and behavioural problems in individuals, families and human groups. In addition to the clinical research methods of psychiatry, it draws from the disciplines of psychiatric epidemiology, medical anthropology and cross-cultural psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信