美国医疗补助计划(Medicaid)患者的 Esketamine 和 Ketamine 处方存在明显的地区差异。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of psychoactive drugs Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/02791072.2023.2178558
Alexia G Aguilar, Burke A Beauregard, Christopher P Conroy, Yashoda T Khatiwoda, Shantia M E Horsford, Stephanie D Nichols, Brian J Piper
{"title":"美国医疗补助计划(Medicaid)患者的 Esketamine 和 Ketamine 处方存在明显的地区差异。","authors":"Alexia G Aguilar, Burke A Beauregard, Christopher P Conroy, Yashoda T Khatiwoda, Shantia M E Horsford, Stephanie D Nichols, Brian J Piper","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2023.2178558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ketamine and esketamine are efficacious for treatment-resistant depression. Unlike other antidepressants, ketamine lacks a therapeutic delay and decreases the risk for suicide. This cross-sectional study geographically characterized ketamine and esketamine prescribing to United States (US) Medicaid patients. Ketamine and esketamine prescription rates and spending per state were obtained. Between 2009 and 2020, ketamine prescribing rates peaked in 2013 followed by a general decline. For ketamine and esketamine in 2019, Montana (967/million enrollees) and Indiana (425) showed significantly higher prescription rates, respectively, relative to the national average. A total of 21 states prescribed neither ketamine nor esketamine in 2019. There was a 121.3% increase in esketamine prescriptions from 2019 to 2020. North Dakota (1,423) and North Carolina (1,094) were significantly elevated relative to the average state for esketamine in 2020. Ten states prescribed neither ketamine nor esketamine in 2020. Medicaid programs in 2020 spent 72.7-fold more for esketamine ($25.3 million) than on ketamine (0.3 million). Despite the effectiveness of ketamine and esketamine for treatment-resistant depression and anti-suicidal properties, their use among Medicaid patients was limited and highly variable in many areas of the US. Further research to better understand the origins of this state-level variation is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pronounced Regional Variation in Esketamine and Ketamine Prescribing to US Medicaid Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Alexia G Aguilar, Burke A Beauregard, Christopher P Conroy, Yashoda T Khatiwoda, Shantia M E Horsford, Stephanie D Nichols, Brian J Piper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02791072.2023.2178558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ketamine and esketamine are efficacious for treatment-resistant depression. Unlike other antidepressants, ketamine lacks a therapeutic delay and decreases the risk for suicide. This cross-sectional study geographically characterized ketamine and esketamine prescribing to United States (US) Medicaid patients. Ketamine and esketamine prescription rates and spending per state were obtained. Between 2009 and 2020, ketamine prescribing rates peaked in 2013 followed by a general decline. For ketamine and esketamine in 2019, Montana (967/million enrollees) and Indiana (425) showed significantly higher prescription rates, respectively, relative to the national average. A total of 21 states prescribed neither ketamine nor esketamine in 2019. There was a 121.3% increase in esketamine prescriptions from 2019 to 2020. North Dakota (1,423) and North Carolina (1,094) were significantly elevated relative to the average state for esketamine in 2020. Ten states prescribed neither ketamine nor esketamine in 2020. Medicaid programs in 2020 spent 72.7-fold more for esketamine ($25.3 million) than on ketamine (0.3 million). Despite the effectiveness of ketamine and esketamine for treatment-resistant depression and anti-suicidal properties, their use among Medicaid patients was limited and highly variable in many areas of the US. Further research to better understand the origins of this state-level variation is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychoactive drugs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471778/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychoactive drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2023.2178558\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2023.2178558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮对耐药性抑郁症有疗效。与其他抗抑郁药不同,氯胺酮没有治疗延迟,并能降低自杀风险。这项横断面研究描述了美国医疗补助计划(Medicaid)患者使用氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮的地域特征。研究获得了氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮的处方率以及各州的支出情况。2009 年至 2020 年间,氯胺酮处方率在 2013 年达到峰值,随后普遍下降。与全国平均水平相比,蒙大拿州(967/百万参保者)和印第安纳州(425)在2019年的氯胺酮和埃克他敏处方率分别明显较高。共有 21 个州在 2019 年既未开具氯胺酮处方,也未开具艾司氯胺酮处方。从 2019 年到 2020 年,艾司氯胺酮处方量增加了 121.3%。2020 年,北达科他州(1,423 人)和北卡罗来纳州(1,094 人)的埃斯氯胺酮处方量明显高于平均水平。有 10 个州在 2020 年既没有开氯胺酮也没有开艾司氯胺酮。2020年,医疗补助计划在艾司氯胺酮上的花费(2530万美元)是氯胺酮(30万美元)的72.7倍。尽管氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮在治疗难治性抑郁症和抗自杀方面效果显著,但在美国许多地区,医疗补助计划的患者对这两种药物的使用非常有限,而且差异很大。我们需要进一步研究,以更好地了解各州差异的根源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pronounced Regional Variation in Esketamine and Ketamine Prescribing to US Medicaid Patients.

Ketamine and esketamine are efficacious for treatment-resistant depression. Unlike other antidepressants, ketamine lacks a therapeutic delay and decreases the risk for suicide. This cross-sectional study geographically characterized ketamine and esketamine prescribing to United States (US) Medicaid patients. Ketamine and esketamine prescription rates and spending per state were obtained. Between 2009 and 2020, ketamine prescribing rates peaked in 2013 followed by a general decline. For ketamine and esketamine in 2019, Montana (967/million enrollees) and Indiana (425) showed significantly higher prescription rates, respectively, relative to the national average. A total of 21 states prescribed neither ketamine nor esketamine in 2019. There was a 121.3% increase in esketamine prescriptions from 2019 to 2020. North Dakota (1,423) and North Carolina (1,094) were significantly elevated relative to the average state for esketamine in 2020. Ten states prescribed neither ketamine nor esketamine in 2020. Medicaid programs in 2020 spent 72.7-fold more for esketamine ($25.3 million) than on ketamine (0.3 million). Despite the effectiveness of ketamine and esketamine for treatment-resistant depression and anti-suicidal properties, their use among Medicaid patients was limited and highly variable in many areas of the US. Further research to better understand the origins of this state-level variation is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信