卫生专业教育系统实践课程有效性的系统评价。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Raymond Boon Tar Lim, Kenneth Wee Beng Hoe, Claire Gek Ling Tan, Huili Zheng
{"title":"卫生专业教育系统实践课程有效性的系统评价。","authors":"Raymond Boon Tar Lim,&nbsp;Kenneth Wee Beng Hoe,&nbsp;Claire Gek Ling Tan,&nbsp;Huili Zheng","doi":"10.1177/01632787231188182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of systems-based practice (SBP) curricula from the perspective of health professions students and workers. A total of 8468 citations were sourced from six electronic databases and manual searches conducted independently by two researchers, of which 44 studies were eventually included. A meta-analysis using a random effects model and a meta-synthesis using the thematic synthesis approach were conducted. Most studies targeted medical students, residents, and resident physicians from various clinical specialties. Almost half of all studies focused on didactic or knowledge-based interventions to teach SBP. About a third of all studies measured non-self-evaluated knowledge change, clinical abilities, and clinical outcomes. Both meta-analysis and meta-synthesis results revealed positive outcomes of increased knowledge of SBP, increased recognition of SBP as a core competency in one's profession, and increased application of SBP knowledge in one's profession. Meta-synthesis results also revealed negative outcomes at the institutional and teacher/health professions level. This review highlights the importance of SBP education and supports the effectiveness of SBP curricula. There is a need to address the negative outcomes at the institutional and teacher/health professions level. Moreover, future studies could investigate the integration of self-assessment outcomes with comparison to some external standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":"46 3","pages":"242-254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Systems-Based Practice Curricula in Health Professions Education.\",\"authors\":\"Raymond Boon Tar Lim,&nbsp;Kenneth Wee Beng Hoe,&nbsp;Claire Gek Ling Tan,&nbsp;Huili Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01632787231188182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of systems-based practice (SBP) curricula from the perspective of health professions students and workers. A total of 8468 citations were sourced from six electronic databases and manual searches conducted independently by two researchers, of which 44 studies were eventually included. A meta-analysis using a random effects model and a meta-synthesis using the thematic synthesis approach were conducted. Most studies targeted medical students, residents, and resident physicians from various clinical specialties. Almost half of all studies focused on didactic or knowledge-based interventions to teach SBP. About a third of all studies measured non-self-evaluated knowledge change, clinical abilities, and clinical outcomes. Both meta-analysis and meta-synthesis results revealed positive outcomes of increased knowledge of SBP, increased recognition of SBP as a core competency in one's profession, and increased application of SBP knowledge in one's profession. Meta-synthesis results also revealed negative outcomes at the institutional and teacher/health professions level. This review highlights the importance of SBP education and supports the effectiveness of SBP curricula. There is a need to address the negative outcomes at the institutional and teacher/health professions level. Moreover, future studies could investigate the integration of self-assessment outcomes with comparison to some external standard.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation & the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"242-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation & the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787231188182\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787231188182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述旨在从卫生专业学生和工作者的角度评估系统实践(SBP)课程的有效性。共有8468条引文来自6个电子数据库和由两名研究人员独立进行的人工检索,其中44项研究最终被纳入。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,采用主题综合方法进行meta综合。大多数研究的对象是来自不同临床专业的医学生、住院医师和住院医师。几乎一半的研究集中在教学或基于知识的干预来教授收缩压。大约三分之一的研究测量了非自我评估的知识变化、临床能力和临床结果。meta分析和meta综合结果均显示,收缩压知识增加、收缩压作为专业核心能力的认知度提高和收缩压知识在专业中的应用增加均具有积极效果。综合综合结果还揭示了机构和教师/卫生专业人员水平的负面结果。这篇综述强调了收缩压教育的重要性,并支持收缩压课程的有效性。有必要解决机构和教师/卫生专业人员一级的消极后果。此外,未来的研究可以探讨自评结果与一些外部标准的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Systems-Based Practice Curricula in Health Professions Education.

This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of systems-based practice (SBP) curricula from the perspective of health professions students and workers. A total of 8468 citations were sourced from six electronic databases and manual searches conducted independently by two researchers, of which 44 studies were eventually included. A meta-analysis using a random effects model and a meta-synthesis using the thematic synthesis approach were conducted. Most studies targeted medical students, residents, and resident physicians from various clinical specialties. Almost half of all studies focused on didactic or knowledge-based interventions to teach SBP. About a third of all studies measured non-self-evaluated knowledge change, clinical abilities, and clinical outcomes. Both meta-analysis and meta-synthesis results revealed positive outcomes of increased knowledge of SBP, increased recognition of SBP as a core competency in one's profession, and increased application of SBP knowledge in one's profession. Meta-synthesis results also revealed negative outcomes at the institutional and teacher/health professions level. This review highlights the importance of SBP education and supports the effectiveness of SBP curricula. There is a need to address the negative outcomes at the institutional and teacher/health professions level. Moreover, future studies could investigate the integration of self-assessment outcomes with comparison to some external standard.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信