有智力障碍和无智力障碍运动员的篮球比赛中的球控和比赛节奏。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
K. E. Sakalidis, J. Pérez-Tejero, M. Khudair, F. J. Hettinga
{"title":"有智力障碍和无智力障碍运动员的篮球比赛中的球控和比赛节奏。","authors":"K. E. Sakalidis,&nbsp;J. Pérez-Tejero,&nbsp;M. Khudair,&nbsp;F. J. Hettinga","doi":"10.1111/jir.13083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Ball possessions and game rhythm are promising variables to better understand teams' collective behaviour during a basketball game. However, the role of these variables is not well documented in teams with intellectual impairments (II). This study aimed to explore ball possession and game rhythm differences between II and non-II basketball games.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were obtained through video observations (53 II games) and the International Basketball Federation records (53 non-II games).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Independent <i>t</i>-tests (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05) revealed that the number of ball possessions was higher and game rhythm was faster in II games. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05) showed that ball possessions and game rhythm developed differently throughout the II games compared with the non-II games.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The differences may be due to the decision-making, tactical and self-regulatory limitations of players with II. These limitations adequately explain why players with II respond differently to the environmental cues and monitor insufficiently their actions compared with players without II. Additionally, the higher number of ball possessions and the faster game rhythm in II games could be an indicator of more intuitive, and thus faster, game-related decision-making. In conclusion, the study provides further understanding of the role of cognition in basketball and contributes to better explain the differences between II and non-II games.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jir.13083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ball possessions and game rhythm in basketball games involving players with and without intellectual impairments\",\"authors\":\"K. E. Sakalidis,&nbsp;J. Pérez-Tejero,&nbsp;M. Khudair,&nbsp;F. J. Hettinga\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.13083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ball possessions and game rhythm are promising variables to better understand teams' collective behaviour during a basketball game. However, the role of these variables is not well documented in teams with intellectual impairments (II). This study aimed to explore ball possession and game rhythm differences between II and non-II basketball games.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data were obtained through video observations (53 II games) and the International Basketball Federation records (53 non-II games).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Independent <i>t</i>-tests (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05) revealed that the number of ball possessions was higher and game rhythm was faster in II games. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05) showed that ball possessions and game rhythm developed differently throughout the II games compared with the non-II games.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The differences may be due to the decision-making, tactical and self-regulatory limitations of players with II. These limitations adequately explain why players with II respond differently to the environmental cues and monitor insufficiently their actions compared with players without II. Additionally, the higher number of ball possessions and the faster game rhythm in II games could be an indicator of more intuitive, and thus faster, game-related decision-making. In conclusion, the study provides further understanding of the role of cognition in basketball and contributes to better explain the differences between II and non-II games.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jir.13083\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13083\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:控球和比赛节奏是有希望的变量,可以更好地理解球队在篮球比赛中的集体行为。然而,这些变量的作用并没有很好地记录在智力障碍的团队中(II)。本研究旨在探讨II和非II篮球比赛中控球和比赛节奏的差异。方法:通过视频观察(53场II比赛)和国际篮联记录(53场非II比赛)获取数据。结果:独立t检验(P≤0.05)显示ⅱ类比赛控球次数较高,比赛节奏较快。双向重复测量方差分析(P≤0.05)表明,在整个II类比赛中,控球和比赛节奏的发展与非II类比赛不同。结论:这种差异可能与II型运动员的决策、战术和自我调节的局限性有关。这些限制充分解释了为什么与没有II的玩家相比,拥有II的玩家对环境线索的反应不同,对自己行为的监控不足。此外,在II类游戏中,更高的控球次数和更快的游戏节奏可能是一个更直观的指标,因此更快,与游戏相关的决策。总之,本研究对认知在篮球运动中的作用提供了进一步的理解,有助于更好地解释II类和非II类比赛之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ball possessions and game rhythm in basketball games involving players with and without intellectual impairments

Ball possessions and game rhythm in basketball games involving players with and without intellectual impairments

Background

Ball possessions and game rhythm are promising variables to better understand teams' collective behaviour during a basketball game. However, the role of these variables is not well documented in teams with intellectual impairments (II). This study aimed to explore ball possession and game rhythm differences between II and non-II basketball games.

Methods

Data were obtained through video observations (53 II games) and the International Basketball Federation records (53 non-II games).

Results

Independent t-tests (P ≤ 0.05) revealed that the number of ball possessions was higher and game rhythm was faster in II games. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (P ≤ 0.05) showed that ball possessions and game rhythm developed differently throughout the II games compared with the non-II games.

Conclusions

The differences may be due to the decision-making, tactical and self-regulatory limitations of players with II. These limitations adequately explain why players with II respond differently to the environmental cues and monitor insufficiently their actions compared with players without II. Additionally, the higher number of ball possessions and the faster game rhythm in II games could be an indicator of more intuitive, and thus faster, game-related decision-making. In conclusion, the study provides further understanding of the role of cognition in basketball and contributes to better explain the differences between II and non-II games.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信