猕猴和人类在声学环境中采样时间规律

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Antonio Criscuolo , Michael Schwartze , Luis Prado , Yaneri Ayala , Hugo Merchant , Sonja A. Kotz
{"title":"猕猴和人类在声学环境中采样时间规律","authors":"Antonio Criscuolo ,&nbsp;Michael Schwartze ,&nbsp;Luis Prado ,&nbsp;Yaneri Ayala ,&nbsp;Hugo Merchant ,&nbsp;Sonja A. Kotz","doi":"10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many animal species show comparable abilities to detect basic rhythms and produce rhythmic behavior. Yet, the capacities to process complex rhythms and synchronize rhythmic behavior appear to be species-specific: vocal learning animals can, but some primates might not. This discrepancy is of high interest as there is a putative link between rhythm processing and the development of sophisticated sensorimotor behavior in humans. Do our closest ancestors show comparable endogenous dispositions to sample the acoustic environment in the absence of task instructions and training? We recorded EEG from macaque monkeys and humans while they passively listened to isochronous equitone sequences. Individual- and trial-level analyses showed that macaque monkeys’ and humans’ delta-band neural oscillations encoded and tracked the timing of auditory events. Further, mu- (8–15 Hz) and beta-band (12–20 Hz) oscillations revealed the superimposition of varied accentuation patterns on a subset of trials. These observations suggest convergence in the encoding and dynamic attending of temporal regularities in the acoustic environment, bridging a gap in the phylogenesis of rhythm cognition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20851,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neurobiology","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 102502"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macaque monkeys and humans sample temporal regularities in the acoustic environment\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Criscuolo ,&nbsp;Michael Schwartze ,&nbsp;Luis Prado ,&nbsp;Yaneri Ayala ,&nbsp;Hugo Merchant ,&nbsp;Sonja A. Kotz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Many animal species show comparable abilities to detect basic rhythms and produce rhythmic behavior. Yet, the capacities to process complex rhythms and synchronize rhythmic behavior appear to be species-specific: vocal learning animals can, but some primates might not. This discrepancy is of high interest as there is a putative link between rhythm processing and the development of sophisticated sensorimotor behavior in humans. Do our closest ancestors show comparable endogenous dispositions to sample the acoustic environment in the absence of task instructions and training? We recorded EEG from macaque monkeys and humans while they passively listened to isochronous equitone sequences. Individual- and trial-level analyses showed that macaque monkeys’ and humans’ delta-band neural oscillations encoded and tracked the timing of auditory events. Further, mu- (8–15 Hz) and beta-band (12–20 Hz) oscillations revealed the superimposition of varied accentuation patterns on a subset of trials. These observations suggest convergence in the encoding and dynamic attending of temporal regularities in the acoustic environment, bridging a gap in the phylogenesis of rhythm cognition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030100822300103X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030100822300103X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多动物物种在检测基本节奏和产生有节奏的行为方面表现出类似的能力。然而,处理复杂节奏和同步节奏行为的能力似乎是特定物种的:声乐学习动物可以,但一些灵长类动物可能不行。这种差异引起了人们的高度兴趣,因为节奏处理和人类复杂感觉运动行为的发展之间存在着假定的联系。在没有任务指令和训练的情况下,我们最亲近的祖先是否表现出类似的内源性倾向来采样声学环境?我们记录了猕猴和人类的脑电图,同时它们被动地听等时音序列。个体和试验水平的分析表明,猕猴和人类的德尔塔带神经振荡编码并跟踪听觉事件的时间。此外,μ-(8-15 Hz)和β波段(12-20 Hz)的振荡揭示了不同重音模式在一组试验中的叠加。这些观察结果表明,声学环境中时间规律的编码和动态处理趋于一致,弥合了节奏认知系统发育的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Macaque monkeys and humans sample temporal regularities in the acoustic environment

Many animal species show comparable abilities to detect basic rhythms and produce rhythmic behavior. Yet, the capacities to process complex rhythms and synchronize rhythmic behavior appear to be species-specific: vocal learning animals can, but some primates might not. This discrepancy is of high interest as there is a putative link between rhythm processing and the development of sophisticated sensorimotor behavior in humans. Do our closest ancestors show comparable endogenous dispositions to sample the acoustic environment in the absence of task instructions and training? We recorded EEG from macaque monkeys and humans while they passively listened to isochronous equitone sequences. Individual- and trial-level analyses showed that macaque monkeys’ and humans’ delta-band neural oscillations encoded and tracked the timing of auditory events. Further, mu- (8–15 Hz) and beta-band (12–20 Hz) oscillations revealed the superimposition of varied accentuation patterns on a subset of trials. These observations suggest convergence in the encoding and dynamic attending of temporal regularities in the acoustic environment, bridging a gap in the phylogenesis of rhythm cognition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Neurobiology
Progress in Neurobiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
107
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Neurobiology is an international journal that publishes groundbreaking original research, comprehensive review articles and opinion pieces written by leading researchers. The journal welcomes contributions from the broad field of neuroscience that apply neurophysiological, biochemical, pharmacological, molecular biological, anatomical, computational and behavioral analyses to problems of molecular, cellular, developmental, systems, and clinical neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信