The Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score: Psychometric Properties, Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version.

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1177/01632787231183089

Tansu Birinci, Suleyman Altun, Nezih Ziroğlu, Ebru Kaya Mutlu

{"title":"The Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score: Psychometric Properties, Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version.","authors":"Tansu Birinci, Suleyman Altun, Nezih Ziroğlu, Ebru Kaya Mutlu","doi":"10.1177/01632787231183089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score (SHEDS) is a self-reported assessment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness that measures elbow-related symptoms and elbow motion capacities. This study aimed to (1) translate and cross-culturally adapt the SHEDS into Turkish and (2) investigate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness. The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the SHEDS (SHEDS-T) were tested in 108 patients (72 male; mean age, 43.2 ± 11.2 years) with post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficients were used to estimate test-retest. Construct validity was analyzed with the Turkish version of the Disabilities Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and the Short Form-12 (PCS-12 and MCS-12). The SHEDS-T showed sufficient internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient = 0.83) and test-retest reliability (ICC = .96). The correlation coefficients between the SHEDS-T, the DASH, and the MEPS were .75 and .54, respectively (p < .001). There was a moderate correlation between the SHEDS-T and PCS-12 (r = .65, p = .01) and a weak positive correlation between the SHEDS and the MCS-12 (r = .40, p = .03). The SHEDS-T has sufficient reliability and validity to measure elbow-related symptoms and elbow motion capacities for Turkish-speaking individuals with post-traumatic elbow stiffness.","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"111-118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787231183089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score (SHEDS) is a self-reported assessment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness that measures elbow-related symptoms and elbow motion capacities. This study aimed to (1) translate and cross-culturally adapt the SHEDS into Turkish and (2) investigate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness. The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the SHEDS (SHEDS-T) were tested in 108 patients (72 male; mean age, 43.2 ± 11.2 years) with post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficients were used to estimate test-retest. Construct validity was analyzed with the Turkish version of the Disabilities Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and the Short Form-12 (PCS-12 and MCS-12). The SHEDS-T showed sufficient internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient = 0.83) and test-retest reliability (ICC = .96). The correlation coefficients between the SHEDS-T, the DASH, and the MEPS were .75 and .54, respectively (p < .001). There was a moderate correlation between the SHEDS-T and PCS-12 (r = .65, p = .01) and a weak positive correlation between the SHEDS and the MCS-12 (r = .40, p = .03). The SHEDS-T has sufficient reliability and validity to measure elbow-related symptoms and elbow motion capacities for Turkish-speaking individuals with post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

查看原文本刊更多论文

上海肘关节功能障碍评分：土耳其版本的心理特性、可靠性和有效性研究。

上海肘关节功能障碍评分（SHEDS）是一种自我报告的创伤后肘关节僵硬评估方法，用于测量肘关节相关症状和肘关节活动能力。本研究旨在：（1）将 SHEDS 翻译成土耳其语并进行跨文化调整；（2）研究土耳其语版 SHEDS 在创伤后肘关节僵硬患者中的心理测量特性。在 108 名创伤后肘关节僵硬患者（72 名男性，平均年龄为 43.2 ± 11.2 岁）中测试了土耳其语版 SHEDS（SHEDS-T）的心理测量特性。Cronbach's alpha 用于评估内部一致性。类内相关系数用于估计测试-再测。通过土耳其版的 "手臂、肩部和手部残疾"（DASH）、"梅奥肘部表现评分"（MEPS）和 "简表-12"（PCS-12 和 MCS-12）分析了结构效度。SHEDS-T显示出足够的内部一致性（Cronbach's α系数=0.83）和测试-再测可靠性（ICC=0.96）。SHEDS-T、DASH 和 MEPS 之间的相关系数分别为 0.75 和 0.54（P < 0.001）。SHEDS-T与PCS-12之间存在中度相关（r = .65，p = .01），SHEDS与MCS-12之间存在弱正相关（r = .40，p = .03）。SHEDS-T具有足够的可靠性和有效性，可用于测量患有创伤后肘关节僵硬的土耳其语患者的肘关节相关症状和肘关节活动能力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Evaluation & the Health Professions 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days