The ReadFree tool for the identification of poor readers: a validation study based on a machine learning approach in monolingual and minority-language children

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Desiré Carioti, Natale Adolfo Stucchi, Carlo Toneatto, Marta Franca Masia, Milena Del Monte, Silvia Stefanelli, Simona Travellini, Antonella Marcelli, Marco Tettamanti, Mirta Vernice, Maria Teresa Guasti, Manuela Berlingeri
{"title":"The ReadFree tool for the identification of poor readers: a validation study based on a machine learning approach in monolingual and minority-language children","authors":"Desiré Carioti,&nbsp;Natale Adolfo Stucchi,&nbsp;Carlo Toneatto,&nbsp;Marta Franca Masia,&nbsp;Milena Del Monte,&nbsp;Silvia Stefanelli,&nbsp;Simona Travellini,&nbsp;Antonella Marcelli,&nbsp;Marco Tettamanti,&nbsp;Mirta Vernice,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Guasti,&nbsp;Manuela Berlingeri","doi":"10.1007/s11881-023-00287-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we validated the “<i>ReadFree tool</i>”, a computerised battery of 12 visual and auditory tasks developed to identify poor readers also in minority-language children (MLC). We tested the task-specific discriminant power on 142 Italian-monolingual participants (8–13 years old) divided into monolingual poor readers (<i>N</i> = 37) and good readers (<i>N</i> = 105) according to standardised Italian reading tests. The performances at the discriminant tasks of the <i>“ReadFree tool</i>” were entered into a classification and regression tree (CART) model to identify monolingual poor and good readers. The set of classification rules extracted from the CART model were applied to the MLC’s performance and the ensuing classification was compared to the one based on standardised Italian reading tests. According to the CART model, auditory go-no/go (regular), RAN and Entrainment<sub>100bpm</sub> were the most discriminant tasks. When compared with the clinical classification, the CART model accuracy was 86% for the monolinguals and 76% for the MLC. Executive functions and timing skills turned out to have a relevant role in reading. Results of the CART model on MLC support the idea that ad hoc standardised tasks that go beyond reading are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"73 3","pages":"356 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11881-023-00287-3.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-023-00287-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this study, we validated the “ReadFree tool”, a computerised battery of 12 visual and auditory tasks developed to identify poor readers also in minority-language children (MLC). We tested the task-specific discriminant power on 142 Italian-monolingual participants (8–13 years old) divided into monolingual poor readers (N = 37) and good readers (N = 105) according to standardised Italian reading tests. The performances at the discriminant tasks of the “ReadFree tool” were entered into a classification and regression tree (CART) model to identify monolingual poor and good readers. The set of classification rules extracted from the CART model were applied to the MLC’s performance and the ensuing classification was compared to the one based on standardised Italian reading tests. According to the CART model, auditory go-no/go (regular), RAN and Entrainment100bpm were the most discriminant tasks. When compared with the clinical classification, the CART model accuracy was 86% for the monolinguals and 76% for the MLC. Executive functions and timing skills turned out to have a relevant role in reading. Results of the CART model on MLC support the idea that ad hoc standardised tasks that go beyond reading are needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

识别贫困读者的ReadFree工具:一项基于机器学习方法的对单语和少数民族儿童的验证研究。
在这项研究中,我们验证了“ReadFree工具”,这是一个由12项视觉和听觉任务组成的计算机化小组,旨在识别少数民族语言儿童(MLC)中的贫困读者。我们对142名意大利单语参与者(8-13岁)进行了任务特异性判别能力测试,根据标准化的意大利阅读测试,他们分为单语差读者(N=37)和好读者(N=105)。将“ReadFree工具”在判别任务中的表现输入分类和回归树(CART)模型,以识别单语差读者和好读者。将从CART模型中提取的一组分类规则应用于MLC的表现,并将随后的分类与基于标准化意大利阅读测试的分类进行比较。根据CART模型,听觉go-no/go(常规)、RAN和Entrainment100bpm是最具判别性的任务。与临床分类相比,单语人群的CART模型准确率为86%,MLC人群的准确率为76%。事实证明,执行职能和时间安排技能在阅读中起着重要作用。关于MLC的CART模型的结果支持了这样一种观点,即需要超越阅读的特别标准化任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信