Influence of Surgical Experience and Risk Factors for Surgical Failure in Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000530526
Min Seok Kim, Jun Young Park, Ki Won Jin, Kyu Hyung Park, Sang Jun Park, Kwangsic Joo, Se Joon Woo
{"title":"Influence of Surgical Experience and Risk Factors for Surgical Failure in Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery.","authors":"Min Seok Kim,&nbsp;Jun Young Park,&nbsp;Ki Won Jin,&nbsp;Kyu Hyung Park,&nbsp;Sang Jun Park,&nbsp;Kwangsic Joo,&nbsp;Se Joon Woo","doi":"10.1159/000530526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to report surgical outcomes and risk factors for primary surgical failure following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, RRD patients who underwent primary surgery at a tertiary center between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2020, were enrolled. Surgical failure was defined as reoperation within 60 days postoperatively due to retinal re-detachment and putative risk factors for surgical failure were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,383 eyes (2,335 patients), 1,342 (56.3%) underwent vitrectomy and 1,041 (43.7%) underwent scleral buckling. The surgical failure rate was 9.1% overall, and 6.0% and 13.1% for the vitrectomy and scleral buckling groups, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, surgical failure was associated with surgical experience (first-year fellow vs. senior professor) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; p = 0.018), scleral buckling (OR: 2.33; p &lt; 0.001), and longer axial length (AL; ≥26.5 mm) (OR: 1.49; p = 0.017). In each surgical approach, age &lt;40 years (OR: 2.11; p = 0.029) in the vitrectomy group and age &gt;40 years (OR, 1.84; p = 0.004), male sex (OR: 1.65; p = 0.015), and first-year fellows compared to senior professors (OR: 1.95; p = 0.013) in the scleral buckling group were associated with surgical failure. Lens status were not associated with the surgical failure rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large retrospective study using data from Korea, vitrectomy was superior to scleral buckling in terms of primary anatomical outcomes in the management of RRD. First-year fellows were a risk factor for surgical failure, especially for scleral buckling. Longer AL was a significant parameter for predicting the success rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19595,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica","volume":"246 2","pages":"141-149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to report surgical outcomes and risk factors for primary surgical failure following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, RRD patients who underwent primary surgery at a tertiary center between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2020, were enrolled. Surgical failure was defined as reoperation within 60 days postoperatively due to retinal re-detachment and putative risk factors for surgical failure were analyzed.

Results: Of 2,383 eyes (2,335 patients), 1,342 (56.3%) underwent vitrectomy and 1,041 (43.7%) underwent scleral buckling. The surgical failure rate was 9.1% overall, and 6.0% and 13.1% for the vitrectomy and scleral buckling groups, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, surgical failure was associated with surgical experience (first-year fellow vs. senior professor) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; p = 0.018), scleral buckling (OR: 2.33; p < 0.001), and longer axial length (AL; ≥26.5 mm) (OR: 1.49; p = 0.017). In each surgical approach, age <40 years (OR: 2.11; p = 0.029) in the vitrectomy group and age >40 years (OR, 1.84; p = 0.004), male sex (OR: 1.65; p = 0.015), and first-year fellows compared to senior professors (OR: 1.95; p = 0.013) in the scleral buckling group were associated with surgical failure. Lens status were not associated with the surgical failure rate.

Conclusion: In this large retrospective study using data from Korea, vitrectomy was superior to scleral buckling in terms of primary anatomical outcomes in the management of RRD. First-year fellows were a risk factor for surgical failure, especially for scleral buckling. Longer AL was a significant parameter for predicting the success rates.

手术经验及危险因素对原发性视网膜脱离手术失败的影响。
本研究的目的是报道孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)修复后原发性手术失败的手术结果和危险因素。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,纳入了2006年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间在三级中心接受初级手术的RRD患者。手术失败定义为术后60天内因视网膜再脱离而再次手术,并分析手术失败的可能危险因素。结果:2383眼(2335例)中,1342眼(56.3%)行玻璃体切除术,1041眼(43.7%)行巩膜扣带术。手术失败率为9.1%,玻璃体切割组和巩膜扣环组分别为6.0%和13.1%。在多因素logistic回归分析中,手术失败与手术经验相关(一年级新生与资深教授)(优势比[OR]: 1.66;p = 0.018),巩膜屈曲(OR: 2.33;p & lt;0.001),更长的轴向长度(AL;≥26.5 mm) (OR: 1.49;P = 0.017)。各手术入路中,年龄≥40岁(OR: 2.11;p = 0.029),年龄为40岁(OR, 1.84;p = 0.004),男性(OR: 1.65;p = 0.015),一年级研究员与资深教授相比(OR: 1.95;P = 0.013)与手术失败相关。晶状体状态与手术失败率无关。结论:在这项使用韩国数据的大型回顾性研究中,就RRD治疗的主要解剖学结果而言,玻璃体切除术优于巩膜屈曲。第一年的研究员是手术失败的危险因素,特别是巩膜屈曲。较长的人工智能是预测成功率的重要参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmologica
Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1899, ''Ophthalmologica'' has become a frequently cited guide to international work in clinical and experimental ophthalmology. It contains a selection of patient-oriented contributions covering the etiology of eye diseases, diagnostic techniques, and advances in medical and surgical treatment. Straightforward, factual reporting provides both interesting and useful reading. In addition to original papers, ''Ophthalmologica'' features regularly timely reviews in an effort to keep the reader well informed and updated. The large international circulation of this journal reflects its importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信