Impaired facial emotion recognition in relation to social behaviours in de novo Parkinson's disease

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Anne Carien Slomp, Sygrid van der Zee, Jeffrey M. Boertien, Marleen J. J. Gerritsen, Teus van Laar, Jacoba M. Spikman
{"title":"Impaired facial emotion recognition in relation to social behaviours in de novo Parkinson's disease","authors":"Anne Carien Slomp,&nbsp;Sygrid van der Zee,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Boertien,&nbsp;Marleen J. J. Gerritsen,&nbsp;Teus van Laar,&nbsp;Jacoba M. Spikman","doi":"10.1111/jnp.12341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Facial emotion recognition (FER) is a crucial component of social cognition and is essential in social-interpersonal behaviour regulation. Although FER impairment is well-established in advanced PD, data about FER at the time of diagnosis and its relationship with social behavioural problems in daily life are lacking. The aim was to examine FER at the time of PD diagnosis compared to a matched healthy control (HC) group and to associate FER with indices of social behavioural problems. In total, 142 de novo, treatment-naïve PD patients and 142 HC were included. FER was assessed by the Ekman 60 faces test (EFT). Behavioural problems in PD patients were assessed using the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX-self and DEX-proxy) and the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-self). PD patients had significantly lower EFT-total scores (<i>p</i> = .001) compared to HC, with worse recognition of Disgust (<i>p</i> = .001) and Sadness (<i>p</i> = .016). Correlational analyses yielded significant correlations between AES-self and both EFT-total (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = .28) and Fear (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = .22). Significant negative correlations were found between DEX-proxy and both EFT-total (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = −.28) and Anger (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = −.26). Analyses of DEX-subscales showed that proxy ratings were significantly higher than patient-ratings for the Social Conventions subscale (<i>p</i> = .047). This DEX-proxy subscale had the strongest correlation with EFT-total (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = −.29). Results show that de novo PD patients already show impaired FER compared to HC. In addition, lower FER is linked to self-reported apathy and proxy-reported social-behavioural problems, especially concerning social conventions. These findings validate the importance of the inclusion of social cognition measures in the neuropsychological assessment even in early PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":"18 2","pages":"205-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnp.12341","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnp.12341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facial emotion recognition (FER) is a crucial component of social cognition and is essential in social-interpersonal behaviour regulation. Although FER impairment is well-established in advanced PD, data about FER at the time of diagnosis and its relationship with social behavioural problems in daily life are lacking. The aim was to examine FER at the time of PD diagnosis compared to a matched healthy control (HC) group and to associate FER with indices of social behavioural problems. In total, 142 de novo, treatment-naïve PD patients and 142 HC were included. FER was assessed by the Ekman 60 faces test (EFT). Behavioural problems in PD patients were assessed using the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX-self and DEX-proxy) and the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-self). PD patients had significantly lower EFT-total scores (p = .001) compared to HC, with worse recognition of Disgust (p = .001) and Sadness (p = .016). Correlational analyses yielded significant correlations between AES-self and both EFT-total (rs = .28) and Fear (rs = .22). Significant negative correlations were found between DEX-proxy and both EFT-total (rs = −.28) and Anger (rs = −.26). Analyses of DEX-subscales showed that proxy ratings were significantly higher than patient-ratings for the Social Conventions subscale (p = .047). This DEX-proxy subscale had the strongest correlation with EFT-total (rs = −.29). Results show that de novo PD patients already show impaired FER compared to HC. In addition, lower FER is linked to self-reported apathy and proxy-reported social-behavioural problems, especially concerning social conventions. These findings validate the importance of the inclusion of social cognition measures in the neuropsychological assessment even in early PD.

新帕金森病患者面部情绪识别受损与社交行为的关系。
面部情绪识别(FER)是社会认知的重要组成部分,对社会人际行为调节至关重要。虽然晚期帕金森病患者的面部情绪识别(FER)障碍已得到证实,但有关诊断时的面部情绪识别(FER)及其与日常生活中社交行为问题之间关系的数据却十分缺乏。本研究的目的是将诊断为帕金森病时的FER与匹配的健康对照组(HC)进行比较,并将FER与社交行为问题的指数联系起来。研究共纳入了142名新确诊的、未经治疗的帕金森病患者和142名健康对照组患者。FER通过Ekman 60面孔测试(EFT)进行评估。对帕金森病患者行为问题的评估采用了执行障碍问卷(DEX-self 和 DEX-proxy)和冷漠评估量表(AES-self)。与HC相比,PD患者的EFT总分明显较低(p = .001),对厌恶(p = .001)和悲伤(p = .016)的识别能力较差。相关分析显示,AES-自我与 EFT-总分(rs = .28)和恐惧(rs = .22)之间存在显著相关。在 DEX 代理与 EFT 总分(rs = -.28)和愤怒(rs = -.26)之间发现了明显的负相关。对 DEX 分量表的分析表明,在社会习俗分量表中,代理评分明显高于患者评分(p = .047)。该 DEX 代理分量表与 EFT 总量的相关性最强(rs = -.29)。结果表明,与正常人相比,新发帕金森病患者的 FER 已经受损。此外,较低的FER与自我报告的冷漠和代理报告的社交行为问题有关,尤其是在社交礼仪方面。这些发现验证了将社会认知测量纳入神经心理学评估的重要性,即使在早期帕金森病患者中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuropsychology
Journal of Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including: • clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups • behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes • cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging • multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science The following types of paper are invited: • papers reporting original empirical investigations • theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data • review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications • brief reports and comments • case reports • fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors) • special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信